
Jeff Wolf and Mikael Ymer will face off in the semifinal of the Firenze Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Saturday at 4:00 pm on CAMPO CENTRALE. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Mikael Ymer who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Mikael Ymer is the pick to win this match.
Mikael Ymer -> 1.64
Jeff Wolf -> 2.31
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jeff Wolf vs. Mikael Ymer
There is no head to head record between Jeff Wolf and Mikael Ymer since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Jeff Wolf
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 6-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 17-26 | 11-16 | 6-9 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-26 | 16-13 | 5-5 | 6-4 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 43-29 | 23-15 | 8-4 | 12-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 16-11 | 7-7 | 0-0 | 9-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 75, Wolf reached the semifinal after defeating Francesco Maestrelli 4-6 6-2 6-1, Maxime Cressy 6-3 6-4 and Alexander Bublik 3-6 7-5 6-1.
In the quarter against Bublik, Wolf recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 7-5 6-1). During the match, Wolf scored 100 points vs Bublik’s 85. The American was extremely aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Regarding the service games, Wolf managed to score 10 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Jeff Wolf lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Wolf put 65% of his first serves in, winning 70% (37/53) of the points behind his 1st serve and 66% (19/29) on the 2nd serve. Wolf broke Bublik 4 times after converting 27% of his break points (4/15).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Wolf has lost 2 set in this tournament to conquer 54% of the points he played.
Wolf has a solid record in the last 8 years having won 61% of his matches (129-83). 8-7 on indoor hard courts in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Wolf has an aggregate53-28 match record in the last 8 years on indoor hard courts.
The American’s best result of the season was getting to the semifinal in the Phoenix Challenger,the Savannah Challenger and the Orlando Challenger.
Wolf has an aggregate 39-26 win-loss record in 2022, 8-7 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Florence
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
Mikael Ymer
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 16-10 | 0-1 | 10-6 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-18 | 6-7 | 3-3 | 11-4 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 31-25 | 9-6 | 3-8 | 17-9 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 27-24 | 9-5 | 10-7 | 5-9 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 99, the Swede got to the semifinal after defeating Andreas Seppi 7-5 6-3, Borna Gojo 4-6 6-4 6-4, Tim Van Rijthoven 6-1 6-2, Aslan Karatsev 6-1 6-76 6-1 and Roberto Carballes Baena 6-4 6-2.
In the quarter, Mikael had a good straight sets win against Carballes Baena (6-4 6-2). During the match Ymer scored 55 points vs Carballes Baena’s 41. Ymer was very aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about serving, Ymer scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he was extremely steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Mikael Ymer lost the serve twice and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Ymer put 81% of his first serves in, winning 71% (30/42) of the points behind his 1st serve and 40% (4/10) on the 2nd serve. The Swede broke Carballes Baena 5 times after converting 83% of his break points (5/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Mikael started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 57% of the points he played.
Ymer’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in Montpellier and Washington.
The Swede has a compiled 26-22 win-loss record in 2022, 12-6 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Wolf | Ymer |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 5 |
| Tot Set | 8 | 12 |
| Tot Games | 72 | 111 |
| Pts | 240-202 | 383-293 |
| Total Points | 442 | 676 |
| Winners | 94 | 177 |
| %Winners | 39% | 46% |
Wolf played 3 matches while Ymer competed in 5 matches. Ymer started his run from the qualifications while Wolf had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Jeff Wolf dropped 2 sets, while Mikael Ymer dropped 2 sets. Wolf has played 4 set(s) less than Ymer (8 vs 12). Therefore, Wolf played 39 games less than Ymer. The American scored 94 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, The Swede bagged 177 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Wolf | Ymer |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 16 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 5.3 | 1.2 |
| 1st in | 133/218 | 250/334 |
| %1st in | 61% | 75% |
| 1st pts | 94/133 | 177/250 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 57/85 | 48/84 |
| %2nd pts | 67% | 57% |
Wolf managed to score 16 aces (5.3 per match). Ymer bagged 6 aces (1.2 per match). Wolf won 71% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 67% of the points. On the other side, Ymer won 71% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Wolf | Ymer |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 10 | 24 |
| Converted | 10/27 | 24/50 |
| % Converted | 37% | 48% |
| Conceded | 10 | 18 |
| Saved | 7 | 8 |
| % Saved | 70% | 44% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 10 |
Jeff broke his opponents 10 times with a 37% conversion rate. The American lost his serve 3 times and he saved 70% of the break points that he conceded. The Swede broke his opponents 24 times with a 48% conversion rate. Mikael conceded his serve 10 times and he saved 44% of the break points that he conceded.
| Wolf | |||||
| R1 Maestrelli |
R2 Cressy |
1/4 Bublik |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-2 6-1 | 6-3 6-4 | 3-6 7-5 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 19 | 28 | 72 | |
| pts | 80-66 | 60-51 | 100-85 | 240-202 | |
| Total points | 146 | 111 | 185 | 442 | |
| Winners | 31 | 26 | 37 | 94 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 43% | 37% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 2 | 4 | 10 | 16 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 44/77 | 36/59 | 53/82 | 133/218 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 61% | 65% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 31/44 | 26/36 | 37/53 | 94/133 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 72% | 70% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/33 | 16/23 | 19/29 | 57/85 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 70% | 66% | 67% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 2 | 4 | 10 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 2/4 | 4/15 | 10/27 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | 27% | 37% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 0 | 6 | 10 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 0/0 | 4/6 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 75% | – | 67% | 47% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | |
| Ymer | |||||||
| Q1 Seppi |
Q3 Gojo |
R1 Van Rijthoven |
R2 Karatsev |
1/4 Carballes Baena |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-3 | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | 6-1 6-2 | 6-1 6-76 6-1 | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 12 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 30 | 15 | 27 | 18 | 111 | |
| pts | 81-68 | 89-81 | 54-26 | 104-77 | 55-41 | 383-293 | |
| Total points | 149 | 170 | 80 | 181 | 96 | 676 | |
| Winners | 37 | 38 | 25 | 47 | 30 | 177 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 43% | 46% | 45% | 55% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||||||
| Aces | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 57/73 | 54/76 | 30/38 | 67/95 | 42/52 | 250/334 | |
| % 1st in | 78% | 71% | 79% | 71% | 81% | 75% | |
| 1st pts | 37/57 | 38/54 | 25/30 | 47/67 | 30/42 | 177/250 | |
| % 1st pts | 65% | 70% | 83% | 70% | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/16 | 13/22 | 7/8 | 14/28 | 4/10 | 48/84 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 59% | 88% | 50% | 40% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 24 | |
| Converted | 4/11 | 4/11 | 4/9 | 7/13 | 5/6 | 24/50 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 36% | 44% | 54% | 83% | 48% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 18 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 1/4 | 0/0 | 3/6 | 1/3 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 25% | – | 50% | 33% | 56% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 10 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWWLWWWL
LWLWLLWWLW Tennis Scores in Florence
- Lorenzo MusettiMusetti – Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Mikael YmerYmer – Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Felix Auger-AliassimeAuger-Aliassime – Brandon NakashimaNakashima (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Jeff WolfWolf – Alexander BublikBublik (3-6 7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Lorenzo Sonego/Andrea VavassoriSonego/Andrea Vavassori – Nikola Mektic/Mate PavicMektic/Mate Pavic (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Nicolas Mahut/Edouard Roger-VasselinMahut/Edouard Roger-Vasselin – Maxime Cressy/John-Patrick SmithCressy/John-Patrick Smith (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Felix Auger AliassimeAuger Aliassime – Brandon NakashimaNakashima (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Lorenzo MusettiMusetti – Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Felix Auger AliassimeAuger Aliassime – Lorenzo MusettiMusetti (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Jeff WolfWolf – Mikael YmerYmer (0-0) – H2H and prediction




