Michael Mmoh and Alexander Cozbinov will square off in the 2nd round of the Fairfield Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 10:00 am on CAMMISA COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Michael Mmoh who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Michael Mmoh is the pick to win this match.
Michael Mmoh -> 1.21
Alexander Cozbinov -> 4.2
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Michael Mmoh vs. Alexander Cozbinov
There is no head to head record between Michael Mmoh and Alexander Cozbinov since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Michael Mmoh
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 8-12 | 3-7 | 2-2 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-21 | 27-14 | 0-1 | 1-4 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 44-29 | 18-12 | 8-7 | 17-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 19-18 | 14-11 | 2-3 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 13-9 | 6-5 | 3-1 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 133, Michael reached the 2nd round after beating Paul Jubb 6-2 0-0 ret..
In the 1st round against Jubb, the American had a free pass after Jubb retired on a 6-2 0-0 . scoreline.
Mmoh has favorable win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 58% of his matches (240-174). 14-12 on hard in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Mmoh has an overall 150-103 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
The American’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in the Tallahassee Challenger and the Cary Challenger.
Michael has an aggregate 32-26 win-loss record in 2022, 14-12 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Fairfield Challenger
Alexander Cozbinov
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 39-35 | 36-29 | 0-0 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-25 | 31-15 | 2-7 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 34-27 | 15-12 | 6-8 | 13-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 5-9 | 4-8 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 587 (career-high), Alexander got to the 2nd round after defeating Strong Kirchheimer 6-4 6-2, Malek Jaziri 6-75 6-3 6-3 and Nicolas Mejia 3-6 6-2 6-3.
In the 1st round against Mejia, Cozbinov recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-2 6-3). During the match Cozbinov scored 103 points vs Mejia’s 92. Alexander was exceptionally aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Talking about serving, Cozbinov managed to score 4 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Alexander Cozbinov lost the serve 6 times and he saved 10 break points. Furthermore, Cozbinov put 61% of his first serves in, winning 61% (38/62) of the points behind his 1st serve and 38% (15/39) on the 2nd serve. Alexander broke Mejia 8 times after converting 35% of his break points (8/23).
Cozbinov’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M15 Cancun.
The Moldovan has an aggregate 29-20 win-loss record in 2022, 27-11 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Mmoh | Cozbinov |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 8 | 75 |
| Pts | 30-20 | 280-230 |
| Total Points | 50 | 510 |
| Winners | 11 | 110 |
| %Winners | 37% | 39% |
Mmoh played 1 match while Cozbinov competed in 3 matches. Cozbinov started his run from the qualifications while Mmoh had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Alexander Cozbinov dropped 2 sets while Michael Mmoh hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Mmoh has played 5 set(s) less than Cozbinov (3 vs 8). Therefore, Mmoh played 67 games less than Cozbinov. Mmoh scored 11 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, The Moldovan made 110 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Mmoh | Cozbinov |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 19 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 6.3 |
| 1st in | 15/27 | 153/260 |
| %1st in | 56% | 59% |
| 1st pts | 11/15 | 110/153 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 7/12 | 41/107 |
| %2nd pts | 58% | 38% |
Mmoh bagged 2 aces . Cozbinov made 19 aces (6.3 per match). Mmoh won 73% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 58% of the points. On the other side, Cozbinov won 72% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 38% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Mmoh | Cozbinov |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 19 |
| Converted | 2/4 | 19/40 |
| % Converted | 50% | 48% |
| Conceded | 2 | 28 |
| Saved | 2 | 17 |
| % Saved | 100% | 61% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 11 |
Mmoh broke his opponent twice with a 50% conversion rate. The American had a solid display on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 2 break points. Cozbinov broke his opponents 19 times with a 48% conversion rate. Alexander conceded his serve 11 times and he saved 61% of the break points that he conceded.
| Mmoh | |||
| R1 Jubb |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 0-0 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 8 | 8 | |
| pts | 30-20 | 30-20 | |
| Total points | 50 | 50 | |
| Winners | 11 | 11 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 15/27 | 15/27 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 11/15 | 11/15 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/12 | 7/12 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/4 | 2/4 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Cozbinov | |||||
| Q1 Kirchheimer |
Q3 Jaziri |
R1 Mejia |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | 6-75 6-3 6-3 | 3-6 6-2 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 31 | 26 | 75 | |
| pts | 65-46 | 112-92 | 103-92 | 280-230 | |
| Total points | 111 | 204 | 195 | 510 | |
| Winners | 25 | 47 | 38 | 110 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 42% | 37% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 7 | 8 | 4 | 19 | |
| Double Faults | 9 | 7 | 4 | 20 | |
| 1st in | 32/63 | 59/96 | 62/101 | 153/260 | |
| % 1st in | 51% | 61% | 61% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 25/32 | 47/59 | 38/62 | 110/153 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 80% | 61% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/31 | 15/37 | 15/39 | 41/107 | |
| % 2nd pts | 35% | 41% | 38% | 38% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 6 | 5 | 8 | 19 | |
| Converted | 6/7 | 5/10 | 8/23 | 19/40 | |
| Converted % | 86% | 50% | 35% | 48% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 7 | 16 | 28 | |
| Saved | 2/5 | 5/7 | 10/16 | 17 | |
| Saved % | 40% | 71% | 63% | 174% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 2 | 6 | 11 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWWLLLLW
LLLW Tennis Scores in Fairfield Challenger
- Sam RifficeRiffice – Stefan KozlovKozlov (3-6 6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- August HolmgrenHolmgren – Zachary SvajdaSvajda (3-6 6-1 6-0) – See score progression
- Giovanni OradiniOradini – Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo (2-6 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (7-65 6-74 7-61) – See score progression
- Alfredo PerezPerez – Malek JaziriJaziri (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Alafia AyeniAyeni – Michail PervolarakisPervolarakis (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Alexander CozbinovCozbinov – Nicolas MejiaMejia (3-6 6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – Leandro RiediRiedi (2-6 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Ben SheltonShelton – Aidan MayoMayo (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Sebastian FanselowFanselow (6-4 7-67) – See score progression
- Valentin VacherotVacherot – Jacob FearnleyFearnley (7-62 7-65) – See score progression
- Evan ZhuZhu – Benjamin LockLock (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Michael MmohMmoh – Paul JubbJubb (6-2 0-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Christian LangmoLangmo – Govind NandaNanda (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Juncheng ShangShang – Charles BroomBroom (7-5 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Alafia AyeniAyeni – Michail PervolarakisPervolarakis (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- August HolmgrenHolmgren – Zachary SvajdaSvajda (3-6 6-1 6-0) – See score progression
- Ben SheltonShelton – Aidan MayoMayo (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – Leandro RiediRiedi (2-6 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Alfredo PerezPerez – Malek JaziriJaziri (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Alexander CozbinovCozbinov – Nicolas MejiaMejia (3-6 6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (7-6(5) 6-7(4) 7-6(1)) – See score progression
- Sam RifficeRiffice – Stefan KozlovKozlov (3-6 6-2 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Roberto QuirozQuiroz – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Giovanni OradiniOradini (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander CozbinovCozbinov – Michael MmohMmoh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christian LangmoLangmo – Sam RifficeRiffice (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Evan ZhuZhu (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alafia AyeniAyeni – August HolmgrenHolmgren (0-0) – H2H and prediction
