Gage Brymer and Alfredo Perez will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Fairfield Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:30 pm on KENNEDY-GROSSMAN. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Gage Brymer who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Gage Brymer is the pick to win this match.
Gage Brymer -> 1.74
Alfredo Perez -> 2
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Gage Brymer vs. Alfredo Perez
There is no head to head record between Gage Brymer and Alfredo Perez since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Gage Brymer
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 18-30 | 18-27 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 43-36 | 41-31 | 0-0 | 1-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 35-28 | 35-28 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 7-6 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 62-35 | 62-34 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 477, Brymer got to the qualifications after beating Roy Smith 6-3 5-7 6-3.
In the qualifications, Brymer defeated Smith (6-3 5-7 6-3). During the match, Brymer scored 109 points vs Smith’s 100. Gage was exceptionally aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Regarding the service games, Brymer wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 5 double faults. Gage Brymer lost the serve 3 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Brymer put 59% of his first serves in, winning 63% (36/57) of the points behind his 1st serve and 62% (24/39) on the 2nd serve. Gage broke Smith 5 times after converting 25% of his break points (5/20).
Brymer has a solid record in the last 8 years having won 61% of his matches (204-132). 41-29 on hard in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Brymer has a composed201-128 record in the last 8 years on hard.
Gage’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Monastir and M15 Rancho Santa Fe.
Gage has an overall 43-31 win-loss record in 2022, 41-29 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Fairfield Challenger
Gage has never competed in this tournament before.
Alfredo Perez
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 13-5 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 7-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-25 | 18-16 | 0-0 | 11-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 35-22 | 22-11 | 9-9 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 20-12 | 20-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 10-3 | 10-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 556 (career-high), Alfredo got to the qualifications after defeating Colin Markes 3-6 7-5 6-3.
In the qualifications against Markes, Alfredo recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 7-5 6-3). During the match Perez and Markes scored the same amount of points (). However, the world no. 477 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. Alfredo was not very aggressive do strike just winners.
About the serving games, Perez was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he was quite steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Alfredo Perez conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 0% of his first serves in, win 0% (/) of the points behind his 1st serve and 0% (/) on the 2nd serve.
Alfredo’s best result of the current year was getting to the semifinal in M15 Punta Cana,M25 Santo Domingo,M15 Metzingen and M25 Setubal.
Alfredo has a composed 26-18 win-loss record in 2022, 17-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Brymer | Perez |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 30 | 30 |
| Pts | 109-100 | 0-0 |
| Total Points | 209 | 0 |
| Winners | 36 | 0 |
| %Winners | 33% | 0% |
Both Brymer and Perez played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Gage Brymer conceded 1 set, while Alfredo Perez dropped 1 set. Talking about their workload, Brymer and Perez have played the same amount of sets 3. They also played the same amount of games (30). Gage scored 36 winners (33% of the total points). On the other side, The American blasted 0 winners (0%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Brymer | Perez |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 0 |
| 1st in | 57/96 | 0/0 |
| %1st in | 59% | 0% |
| 1st pts | 36/57 | 0/0 |
| %1st pts | 63% | 0% |
| 2nd pts | 24/39 | 0/0 |
| %2nd pts | 62% | 0% |
Brymer didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Perez also didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Brymer won 63% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 62% of the points. On the other side, Perez won 0% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 0% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Brymer | Perez |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 0 |
| Converted | 5/20 | 0/0 |
| % Converted | 25% | 0% |
| Conceded | 9 | 0 |
| Saved | 6 | 0 |
| % Saved | 67% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 0 |
Gage broke his opponent 5 times with a 25% conversion rate. Brymer conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. On the other side, Alfredo hasn’t manged yet to break his opponent. He didn’t manage to even clinch a single break point. Perez was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points without even conceding a single break point.
| Brymer | |||
| Q1 Smith |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 5-7 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
| pts | 109-100 | 109-100 | |
| Total points | 209 | 209 | |
| Winners | 36 | 36 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 57/96 | 57/96 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 36/57 | 36/57 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 63% | |
| 2nd pts | 24/39 | 24/39 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/20 | 5/20 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 6/9 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Perez | |||
| Q1 Markes |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 7-5 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
| pts | – | 0-0 | |
| Total points | 0 | 0 | |
| Winners | 0 | ||
| %Winners | 0% | 0% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | ||
| 1st in | / | 0/0 | |
| % 1st in | 0% | 0% | |
| 1st pts | / | 0/0 | |
| % 1st pts | 0% | 0% | |
| 2nd pts | / | 0/0 | |
| % 2nd pts | 0% | 0% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 0 | ||
| Converted | / | 0/0 | |
| Converted % | 0% | 0% | |
| Conceded | 0 | ||
| Saved | 0/ | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | ||
Head 2 Head
LWWWLWWLWW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Malek JaziriJaziri – Alexander CozbinovCozbinov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto QuirozQuiroz – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Denis KudlaKudla – Michail PervolarakisPervolarakis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gage BrymerBrymer – Alfredo PerezPerez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giovanni OradiniOradini – Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Valentin VacherotVacherot – Jacob FearnleyFearnley (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan ZhuZhu – Benjamin LockLock (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Ezekiel ClarkClark – Sam RifficeRiffice (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Alafia AyeniAyeni (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Govind NandaNanda – Christian LangmoLangmo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- August HolmgrenHolmgren – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Paul JubbJubb – Michael MmohMmoh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
