Alex Michelsen and Paul Jubb will face off in the 2nd round of the Tiburon Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 4:30 pm on STADIUM COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Paul Jubb who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Paul Jubb is the pick to win this match.
Paul Jubb -> 1.28
Alex Michelsen -> 3.50
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Alex Michelsen vs. Paul Jubb
There is no head to head record between Alex Michelsen and Paul Jubb since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Alex Michelsen
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 42-33 | 26-14 | 4-9 | 5-4 | 7-6 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 61-27 | 30-13 | 4-3 | 19-7 | 8-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 23-10 | 14-8 | 0-1 | 9-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked, Alex reached the 2nd round after beating Gage Brymer 6-2 7-5, Simon Carr 6-2 4-6 6-1 and Juncheng Shang 7-5 4-6 7-65.
In the 1st round, Michelsen defeated Shang (7-5 4-6 7-65). During the match, Michelsen scored 113 points vs Shang’s 107. Alex was quite aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Regarding the service games, Michelsen managed to score 2 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Alex Michelsen lost the serve 5 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Michelsen put 52% of his first serves in, winning 68% (38/56) of the points behind his 1st serve and 55% (28/51) on the 2nd serve. Alex broke Shang 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
Michelsen has a solid win-loss record in the last 1 years having won 68% of his matches (13-6). 13-5 on hard in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Michelsen has a compiled13-5 win-loss record in the last 1 years on hard.
The American’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in M15 San Diego and M15 Lubbock.
The American has a compiled 13-6 win-loss record in 2022, 13-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tiburon Challenger
Michelsen has never competed in this tournament before.
Paul Jubb
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 47-27 | 26-13 | 0-2 | 12-7 | 9-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-13 | 19-9 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 32-26 | 7-9 | 10-4 | 12-8 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 51-13 | 48-10 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 215, Paul reached the 2nd round after beating Govind Nanda 7-5 4-6 6-3.
In the 1st round, The Brit defeated Nanda (7-5 4-6 6-3). During the match Jubb scored 95 points vs Nanda’s 93. Jubb was pretty aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about serving, Jubb fired 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Paul Jubb lost the serve 5 times and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Jubb put 59% of his first serves in, winning 67% (30/45) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (15/31) on the 2nd serve. Paul broke Nanda 7 times after converting 58% of his break points (7/12).
Paul’s best result of the season was getting to the final in the Santa Cruz de la Sierra 2 Challenger.
Jubb has an overall 27-20 win-loss record in 2022, 6-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Michelsen | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 8 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 80 | 31 |
| Pts | 272-225 | 95-93 |
| Total Points | 497 | 188 |
| Winners | 94 | 30 |
| %Winners | 35% | 32% |
Michelsen played 3 matches while Jubb competed in 1 match. Michelsen started his run from the qualifications while Jubb had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Alex Michelsen surrendered 2 sets, while Paul Jubb surrendered 1 set. Michelsen has played 5 sets more than Jubb (8 vs 3). Therefore, Michelsen played 49 games more than Jubb. Michelsen scored 94 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, The Brit blasted 30 winners (32%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Michelsen | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 1.7 | 4 |
| 1st in | 132/240 | 45/76 |
| %1st in | 55% | 59% |
| 1st pts | 94/132 | 30/45 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 67% |
| 2nd pts | 57/108 | 15/31 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 48% |
Michelsen scored 5 aces (1.7 per match). Jubb made 4 aces . Michelsen won 71% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Jubb won 67% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Michelsen | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 16 | 7 |
| Converted | 16/29 | 7/12 |
| % Converted | 55% | 58% |
| Conceded | 21 | 6 |
| Saved | 11 | 1 |
| % Saved | 52% | 17% |
| Times Broken | 10 | 5 |
Alex broke his opponents 16 times with a 55% conversion rate. The American lost his serve 10 times and he saved 52% of the break points that he conceded. The Brit broke his opponent 7 times with a 58% conversion rate. Paul conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 17% of the break points that he conceded.
| Michelsen | |||||
| Q1 Brymer |
Q3 Carr |
R1 Shang |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 7-5 | 6-2 4-6 6-1 | 7-5 4-6 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 25 | 35 | 80 | |
| pts | 77-60 | 82-58 | 113-107 | 272-225 | |
| Total points | 137 | 140 | 220 | 497 | |
| Winners | 24 | 32 | 38 | 94 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 39% | 34% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 6 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 32/66 | 44/67 | 56/107 | 132/240 | |
| % 1st in | 48% | 66% | 52% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 24/32 | 32/44 | 38/56 | 94/132 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 73% | 68% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/34 | 10/23 | 28/51 | 57/108 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 43% | 55% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 7 | 5 | 16 | |
| Converted | 4/11 | 7/11 | 5/7 | 16/29 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 64% | 71% | 55% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 5 | 10 | 21 | |
| Saved | 5/6 | 1/5 | 5/10 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 83% | 20% | 50% | 51% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 4 | 5 | 10 | |
| Jubb | |||||
| R1 Nanda |
Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 4-6 6-3 | ||||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |||
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |||
| pts | 95-93 | 95-93 | |||
| Total points | 188 | 188 | |||
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |||
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | |||
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |||
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1st in | 45/76 | 45/76 | |||
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |||
| 1st pts | 30/45 | 30/45 | |||
| % 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |||
| 2nd pts | 15/31 | 15/31 | |||
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |||
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |||
| Converted | 7/12 | 7/12 | |||
| Converted % | 58% | 58% | |||
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |||
| Saved | 1/6 | 1 | |||
| Saved % | 17% | 6% | |||
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |||
Head 2 Head
LWWWLWLLWL
LLWLWWLWLL Tennis Scores in Tiburon Challenger
- Zachary SvajdaSvajda – Michael MmohMmoh (6-3 5-7 7-64) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Ben SheltonShelton – Sam RifficeRiffice (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo – Valentin VacherotVacherot (6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Nick ChappellChappell (6-3 6-76 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Denis KudlaKudla – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Luke SavilleSaville – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Stefan KozlovKozlov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
