Daniil Glinka and Evan King will play each other in the qualifications of the Tiburon Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:30 pm on COURT 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daniil Glinka who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Daniil Glinka is the pick to win this match.
Daniil Glinka -> 1.59
Evan King -> 2.24
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Daniil Glinka vs. Evan King
There is no head to head record between Daniil Glinka and Evan King since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Daniil Glinka
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 37-28 | 19-14 | 0-1 | 14-11 | 0-0 | 4-2 |
2023 | 40-23 | 18-14 | 0-1 | 15-6 | 0-0 | 7-2 |
2022 | 23-29 | 17-22 | 0-0 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
2021 | 29-31 | 9-14 | 12-11 | 8-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 13-11 | 10-8 | 2-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 749, the Estonian got to the qualifications after beating Ezekiel Clark 6-4 6-3.
In the qualifications, The Estonian had a good straight sets win against Clark (6-4 6-3). During the match, Glinka scored 60 points vs Clark’s 45. The Estonian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about the service games, Glinka bagged 12 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Daniil Glinka was very effective on serve to win 90% (26/29) of his 1st serve and 61% (14/23) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Estonian broke Clark 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Glinka has won exactly 50% of his matches (99-99) in the last 5 years. 17-19 on hard in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Glinka has a composed48-50 record in the last 5 years on hard.
The Estonian’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in M15 Vaasa.
Glinka has a compiled 23-26 win-loss record in 2022, 17-19 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tiburon Challenger
The Estonian has never competed in this tournament before.
Evan King
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 0-4 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 3-14 | 3-6 | 0-4 | 0-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2021 | 6-14 | 0-2 | 2-7 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 4-7 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 840, the American reached the qualifications after beating Malek Jaziri 6-2 6-1.
In the qualifications, Evan had a good straight sets win against Jaziri (6-2 6-1). During the match King scored 56 points vs Jaziri’s 31. King was extremely aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Talking about serving, King made 12 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Evan King was quite effective on serve to win 84% (21/25) of his 1st serve and 80% (8/10) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. King broke Jaziri 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
Evan has a composed 2-12 win-loss record in 2022, 2-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Glinka | King |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 19 | 15 |
Pts | 60-45 | 56-31 |
Total Points | 105 | 87 |
Winners | 26 | 21 |
%Winners | 43% | 38% |
Both Glinka and King played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Glinka and King have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Glinka played 4 games more than King. Daniil scored 26 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, The American fired 21 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Glinka | King |
---|---|---|
Aces | 12 | 12 |
Avg per match | 12 | 12 |
1st in | 29/52 | 25/35 |
%1st in | 56% | 71% |
1st pts | 26/29 | 21/25 |
%1st pts | 90% | 84% |
2nd pts | 14/23 | 8/10 |
%2nd pts | 61% | 80% |
Glinka struck 12 aces . King fired 12 aces . Glinka won 90% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 61% of the points. On the other side, King won 84% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 80% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Glinka | King |
---|---|---|
Won | 3 | 5 |
Converted | 3/7 | 5/7 |
% Converted | 43% | 71% |
Conceded | 3 | 0 |
Saved | 2 | 0 |
% Saved | 67% | 0% |
Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
Daniil broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. Daniil conceded his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. The American was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
Glinka | |||
Q1 Clark |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
pts | 60-45 | 60-45 | |
Total points | 105 | 105 | |
Winners | 26 | 26 | |
%Winners | 43% | 43% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 12 | 12 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
1st in | 29/52 | 29/52 | |
% 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
1st pts | 26/29 | 26/29 | |
% 1st pts | 90% | 90% | |
2nd pts | 14/23 | 14/23 | |
% 2nd pts | 61% | 61% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
King | |||
Q1 Jaziri |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
pts | 56-31 | 56-31 | |
Total points | 87 | 87 | |
Winners | 21 | 21 | |
%Winners | 38% | 38% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 12 | 12 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 25/35 | 25/35 | |
% 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
1st pts | 21/25 | 21/25 | |
% 1st pts | 84% | 84% | |
2nd pts | 8/10 | 8/10 | |
% 2nd pts | 80% | 80% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
Saved % | – | 0% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Donald YoungYoung – Luke SavilleSaville (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan KingKing – Daniil GlinkaGlinka (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Denis KudlaKudla – Brandon HoltHolt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian FanselowFanselow – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nick ChappellChappell – Alfredo PerezPerez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Darian KingKing – August HolmgrenHolmgren (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin LockLock – Michael MmohMmoh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo – Jonas Eriksson ZivertsEriksson Ziverts (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christian LangmoLangmo – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giovanni OradiniOradini – Stefan KozlovKozlov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michail PervolarakisPervolarakis – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan ZhuZhu – Valentin VacherotVacherot (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Charles BroomBroom – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick KypsonKypson – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Govind NandaNanda – Paul JubbJubb (1-2) – H2H and prediction