Jordan Thompson and Ethan Quinn will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Charleston Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 11:30 am on CENTER COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jordan Thompson who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jordan Thompson is the pick to win this match.
Jordan Thompson -> 1.21
Ethan Quinn -> 4.2
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jordan Thompson vs. Ethan Quinn
There is no head to head record between Jordan Thompson and Ethan Quinn since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Jordan Thompson
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 32-23 | 23-13 | 3-5 | 2-2 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
2023 | 41-28 | 22-15 | 0-3 | 7-4 | 12-6 | 0-0 |
2022 | 40-26 | 18-14 | 2-6 | 8-1 | 12-5 | 0-0 |
2021 | 23-25 | 10-11 | 2-6 | 0-1 | 9-5 | 2-2 |
2020 | 12-13 | 6-6 | 1-2 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 85, the Australian reached the 2nd round after defeating Alexis Galarneau 6-1 6-4.
In the 1st round, Thompson had a good straight sets win against Galarneau (6-1 6-4). During the match, Thompson scored 67 points vs Galarneau’s 48. Jordan was pretty aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Regarding the service games, Thompson struck 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Jordan Thompson was quite effective on serve to win 74% (26/35) of his 1st serve and 68% (17/25) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Thompson broke Galarneau 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Thompson has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 60% of his matches (384-255). 15-13 on hard in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Thompson has an aggregate 216-141 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
Jordan’s best result of the season was getting to the final in the Surbiton Challenger,the Nottingham Challenger and the Columbus 2 Challenger.
The Australian has an overall 36-25 win-loss record in 2022, 15-13 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Charleston Challenger
The Australian has never competed in this tournament before.
Ethan Quinn
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 26-31 | 17-18 | 2-7 | 6-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 21-16 | 12-11 | 0-0 | 8-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 30-14 | 21-7 | 6-4 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 4-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 489, Ethan got to the 2nd round after defeating Sebastian Fanselow 4-6 6-3 6-3.
In the 1st round against Fanselow, Quinn recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-3 6-3). During the match Quinn scored 101 points vs Fanselow’s 95. The American was pretty aggressive to blast 36 winners.
About the serving games, Quinn fired 4 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Overall, Ethan Quinn was very effective on serve to win 72% (36/50) of his 1st serve and 51% (18/35) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The American broke Fanselow 4 times after converting 20% of his break points (4/20).
Ethan’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M15 Vero Beach,M15 San Diego and M25 Champaign.
Quinn has an aggregate 27-10 win-loss record in 2022, 21-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Thompson | Quinn |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
Tot Games | 17 | 28 |
Pts | 67-48 | 101-95 |
Total Points | 115 | 196 |
Winners | 26 | 36 |
%Winners | 39% | 36% |
Both Thompson and Quinn played 1 match. At the moment, Ethan Quinn surrendered 1 set while Jordan Thompson hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Thompson has played 1 set(s) less than Quinn (2 vs 3). Therefore, Thompson played 11 games less than Quinn. The Australian scored 26 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Quinn fired 36 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Thompson | Quinn |
---|---|---|
Aces | 5 | 4 |
Avg per match | 5 | 4 |
1st in | 35/60 | 50/85 |
%1st in | 58% | 59% |
1st pts | 26/35 | 36/50 |
%1st pts | 74% | 72% |
2nd pts | 17/25 | 18/35 |
%2nd pts | 68% | 51% |
Thompson made 5 aces . Quinn scored 4 aces . Thompson won 74% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 68% of the points. On the other side, Quinn won 72% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 51% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Thompson | Quinn |
---|---|---|
Won | 3 | 4 |
Converted | 3/7 | 4/20 |
% Converted | 43% | 20% |
Conceded | 4 | 6 |
Saved | 4 | 4 |
% Saved | 100% | 67% |
Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
Jordan broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. The Australian pretty solid on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 4 break points. The American broke his opponent 4 times with a 20% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
Thompson | |||
R1 Galarneau |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
pts | 67-48 | 67-48 | |
Total points | 115 | 115 | |
Winners | 26 | 26 | |
%Winners | 39% | 39% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 5 | 5 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 35/60 | 35/60 | |
% 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
1st pts | 26/35 | 26/35 | |
% 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
2nd pts | 17/25 | 17/25 | |
% 2nd pts | 68% | 68% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
Saved | 4/4 | 4 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Quinn | |||
R1 Fanselow |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
pts | 101-95 | 101-95 | |
Total points | 196 | 196 | |
Winners | 36 | 36 | |
%Winners | 36% | 36% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 4 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
1st in | 50/85 | 50/85 | |
% 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
1st pts | 36/50 | 36/50 | |
% 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
2nd pts | 18/35 | 18/35 | |
% 2nd pts | 51% | 51% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/20 | 4/20 | |
Converted % | 20% | 20% | |
Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Charleston Challenger
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Evan ZhuZhu (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Giovanni OradiniOradini – Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo (5-7 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Dominic Stephan StrickerStephan Stricker (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- August HolmgrenHolmgren – Aidan MchughMchugh (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Michael MmohMmoh – Tennys SandgrenSandgren (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Donald YoungYoung – Omni KumarKumar (2-6 6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Govind NandaNanda – Emilio NavaNava (5-7 6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Garrett JohnsJohns – Gianni RossRoss (6-3 5-7 6-1) – See score progression
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Facundo MenaMena – Valentin VacherotVacherot (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Roberto QuirozQuiroz – Cannon KingsleyKingsley (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Leandro RiediRiedi – Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer (6-1 6-0) – See score progression
- Paul JubbJubb – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (7-5 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Zachary SvajdaSvajda – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (7-67 7-61) – See score progression
- Ethan QuinnQuinn – Sebastian FanselowFanselow (4-6 6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Charles BroomBroom (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Donald YoungYoung – Govind NandaNanda (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto QuirozQuiroz – Patrick KypsonKypson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo MenaMena – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael MmohMmoh – August HolmgrenHolmgren (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giovanni OradiniOradini – Garrett JohnsJohns (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Paul JubbJubb – Nicolas MejiaMejia (0-0) – H2H and prediction