Alexander Weis and Gabriele Piraino will square off in the qualifications of the Genova Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 10:00 am on CENTRALE. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Alexander Weis who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Alexander Weis is the pick to win this match.
Alexander Weis -> 1.41
Gabriele Piraino -> 2.73
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Alexander Weis vs. Gabriele Piraino
There is no head to head record between Alexander Weis and Gabriele Piraino since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Alexander Weis
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24-30 | 0-0 | 24-30 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 51-37 | 0-2 | 51-33 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 58-30 | 2-3 | 55-24 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 49-31 | 0-0 | 49-30 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 13-9 | 0-0 | 13-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 406, Alexander reached the qualifications after defeating Leopold Zima 6-3 6-3.
In the qualifications, Weis had a good straight sets win against Zima (6-3 6-3). During the match, Weis scored 66 points vs Zima’s 50. The Italian was extremely aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Talking about the service games, Weis couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Alexander Weis was very effective on serve to win 81% (21/26) of his 1st serve and 60% (15/25) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Italian broke Zima 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Weis has a winning win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 56% of his matches (225-175). 35-19 on clay in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Weis has an aggregate211-153 match record in the last 7 years on clay.
Weis’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M25 Santa Margherita di Pula.
Alexander has a composed 38-25 win-loss record in 2022, 35-19 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Genova Challenger
Alexander has never competed in this tournament before.
Gabriele Piraino
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 26-21 | 5-6 | 21-15 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-31 | 4-3 | 23-28 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 37-26 | 2-2 | 35-24 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 20-12 | 0-0 | 20-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 599 (career-high), Piraino reached the qualifications after defeating Filippo Verdese 6-1 6-3.
In the qualifications, Piraino had a good straight sets win against Verdese (6-1 6-3). During the match Piraino scored 59 points vs Verdese’s 36. Piraino was very aggressive to blast 17 winners.
About the serving games, Piraino recorded 4 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Gabriele Piraino lost the serve once and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Piraino put 48% of his first serves in, winning 65% (17/26) of the points behind his 1st serve and 68% (19/28) on the 2nd serve. The Italian broke Verdese 5 times after converting 83% of his break points (5/6).
The Italian’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M25 Padova.
Piraino has a composed 34-22 win-loss record in 2022, 32-20 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Weis | Piraino |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 16 |
| Pts | 66-50 | 59-36 |
| Total Points | 116 | 95 |
| Winners | 21 | 17 |
| %Winners | 32% | 29% |
Both Weis and Piraino played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Weis and Piraino have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Weis played 2 games more than Piraino. Alexander scored 21 winners (32% of the total points). On the other side, Gabriele blasted 17 winners (29%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Weis | Piraino |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 4 |
| 1st in | 26/51 | 26/54 |
| %1st in | 51% | 48% |
| 1st pts | 21/26 | 17/26 |
| %1st pts | 81% | 65% |
| 2nd pts | 15/25 | 19/28 |
| %2nd pts | 60% | 68% |
Weis didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Piraino made 4 aces . Weis won 81% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 60% of the points. On the other side, Piraino won 65% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 68% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Weis | Piraino |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 5 |
| Converted | 4/10 | 5/6 |
| % Converted | 40% | 83% |
| Conceded | 3 | 6 |
| Saved | 2 | 5 |
| % Saved | 67% | 83% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
The Italian broke his opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. Alexander lost his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Piraino broke his opponent 5 times with a 83% conversion rate. Piraino conceded his serve once and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded.
| Weis | |||
| Q1 Zima |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 66-50 | 66-50 | |
| Total points | 116 | 116 | |
| Winners | 21 | 21 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 26/51 | 26/51 | |
| % 1st in | 51% | 51% | |
| 1st pts | 21/26 | 21/26 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/25 | 15/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Piraino | |||
| Q1 Verdese |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 59-36 | 59-36 | |
| Total points | 95 | 95 | |
| Winners | 17 | 17 | |
| %Winners | 29% | 29% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 26/54 | 26/54 | |
| % 1st in | 48% | 48% | |
| 1st pts | 17/26 | 17/26 | |
| % 1st pts | 65% | 65% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/28 | 19/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 68% | 68% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/6 | 5/6 | |
| Converted % | 83% | 83% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 5/6 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 83% | 83% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLWLWLWW
LLWWWWWWLW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Andrea ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Raul BrancaccioBrancaccio (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi – Pablo AndujarAndujar (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Federico DelbonisDelbonis – Sebastian OfnerOfner (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dusan LajovicLajovic – Gianluca MagerMager (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oscar Jose GutierrezJose Gutierrez – Matteo MartineauMartineau (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea VavassoriVavassori – Maximilian MartererMarterer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander WeisWeis – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oleg PrihodkoPrihodko – Sandro KoppKopp (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrey ChepelevChepelev – Tommaso CompagnucciCompagnucci (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adrian AndreevAndreev – Salvatore CarusoCaruso (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri – Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Martin KrumichKrumich – Luigi SorrentinoSorrentino (1-0) – H2H and prediction
