![Prediction And Head To Head Aidan Mayo Vs. Daniil Glinka W5yraathrf Prediction and head to head Aidan Mayo vs. Daniil Glinka](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Aidan-Mayo-vs.-Daniil-Glinka-W5yraAThrf.jpg)
Aidan Mayo and Daniil Glinka will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Cary Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 12:00 pm on COURT 13. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Aidan Mayo who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Aidan Mayo is the pick to win this match.
Aidan Mayo -> 1.42
Daniil Glinka -> 2.69
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Aidan Mayo vs. Daniil Glinka
There is no head to head record between Aidan Mayo and Daniil Glinka since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Aidan Mayo
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 7-16 | 3-8 | 4-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 46-28 | 24-15 | 2-5 | 20-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 34-25 | 27-19 | 4-4 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 9-8 | 9-6 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 554 (career-high), Aidan reached the qualifications after beating Sam Riffice 4-6 7-5 6-3.
In the qualifications against Riffice, The American recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 7-5 6-3). During the match, Mayo scored 105 points vs Riffice’s 96. Mayo was quite aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Regarding the service games, Mayo recorded 14 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Aidan Mayo was quite efficient on serve to win 82% (36/44) of his 1st serve and 56% (24/43) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The American broke Riffice 3 times after converting 30% of his break points (3/10).
Mayo has a winning match record in the last 4 years having won 58% of his matches (40-29). 23-13 on hard in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Mayo has a composed33-20 win-loss record in the last 4 years on hard.
Mayo’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in M25 Santo Domingo and the Granby Challenger.
The American has an overall 27-17 win-loss record in 2022, 23-13 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Cary Challenger
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
Daniil Glinka
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 23-19 | 8-7 | 0-1 | 11-9 | 0-0 | 4-2 |
2023 | 40-23 | 18-14 | 0-1 | 15-6 | 0-0 | 7-2 |
2022 | 23-29 | 17-22 | 0-0 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
2021 | 29-31 | 9-14 | 12-11 | 8-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 13-11 | 10-8 | 2-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 831, the Estonian reached the qualifications after beating Roy Smith 6-1 6-4.
In the qualifications, Glinka had a good straight sets win against Smith (6-1 6-4). During the match Glinka scored 61 points vs Smith’s 42. Glinka was very aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Talking about serving, Glinka scored 9 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Daniil Glinka was pretty effective on serve to win 77% (24/31) of his 1st serve and 68% (15/22) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Estonian broke Smith 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
The Estonian’s best result of the current year was getting to the semifinal in M15 Vaasa.
Glinka has a compiled 20-24 win-loss record in 2022, 15-18 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Mayo | Glinka |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
Tot Games | 31 | 17 |
Pts | 105-96 | 61-42 |
Total Points | 201 | 103 |
Winners | 36 | 24 |
%Winners | 34% | 39% |
Both Mayo and Glinka played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Aidan Mayo lost 1 set while Daniil Glinka hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Mayo has played 1 set more than Glinka (3 vs 2). Therefore, Mayo played 14 games more than Glinka. Aidan scored 36 winners (34% of the total points). On the other side, Daniil made 24 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Mayo | Glinka |
---|---|---|
Aces | 14 | 9 |
Avg per match | 14 | 9 |
1st in | 44/87 | 31/53 |
%1st in | 51% | 58% |
1st pts | 36/44 | 24/31 |
%1st pts | 82% | 77% |
2nd pts | 24/43 | 15/22 |
%2nd pts | 56% | 68% |
Mayo recorded 14 aces . Glinka recorded 9 aces . Mayo won 82% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Glinka won 77% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 68% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Mayo | Glinka |
---|---|---|
Won | 3 | 3 |
Converted | 3/10 | 3/7 |
% Converted | 30% | 43% |
Conceded | 4 | 0 |
Saved | 2 | 0 |
% Saved | 50% | 0% |
Times Broken | 2 | 0 |
The American broke his opponent 3 times with a 30% conversion rate. Aidan lost his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Daniil broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. The Estonian was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
Mayo | |||
Q1 Riffice |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 4-6 7-5 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
pts | 105-96 | 105-96 | |
Total points | 201 | 201 | |
Winners | 36 | 36 | |
%Winners | 34% | 34% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 14 | 14 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
1st in | 44/87 | 44/87 | |
% 1st in | 51% | 51% | |
1st pts | 36/44 | 36/44 | |
% 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
2nd pts | 24/43 | 24/43 | |
% 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/10 | 3/10 | |
Converted % | 30% | 30% | |
Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Glinka | |||
Q1 Smith |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
pts | 61-42 | 61-42 | |
Total points | 103 | 103 | |
Winners | 24 | 24 | |
%Winners | 39% | 39% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 9 | 9 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 31/53 | 31/53 | |
% 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
1st pts | 24/31 | 24/31 | |
% 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
2nd pts | 15/22 | 15/22 | |
% 2nd pts | 68% | 68% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
Saved % | – | 0% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Denis KudlaKudla – (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Naoki NakagawaNakagawa – Donald YoungYoung (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael MmohMmoh – Daniel CoxCox (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – Cannon KingsleyKingsley (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nathan PonwithPonwith – Garrett JohnsJohns (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – Dominik KoepferKoepfer (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ezekiel ClarkClark – Ryan HarrisonHarrison (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oliver CrawfordCrawford – Facundo MenaMena (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aidan MchughMchugh – Tennys SandgrenSandgren (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Keegan SmithSmith – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan SeggermanSeggerman – Jordan ThompsonThompson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – Govind NandaNanda (1-0) – H2H and prediction