Charles Broom and Ben Patael will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Nonthaburi 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 10:30 am on COURT B. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Charles Broom who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Charles Broom is the pick to win this match.
Charles Broom -> 1.69
Ben Patael -> 2.12
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Charles Broom vs. Ben Patael
There is no head to head record between Charles Broom and Ben Patael since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Charles Broom
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 41-33 | 19-13 | 0-0 | 14-13 | 8-7 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 41-34 | 8-7 | 0-4 | 20-15 | 11-6 | 2-2 |
| 2022 | 44-30 | 28-17 | 0-0 | 10-7 | 6-6 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 35-10 | 20-6 | 8-3 | 7-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 7-3 | 7-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 372, the Brit reached the 2nd round after defeating Sidharth Rawat 6-4 6-4, Dominik Palan 6-4 7-62 and Tristan Schoolkate 7-5 7-64.
In the 1st round, Broom had a good straight sets win against Schoolkate (7-5 7-64). During the match, Broom scored 79 points vs Schoolkate’s 66. Charles was quite aggressive to blast 39 winners.
Regarding the service games, Broom scored 11 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Charles Broom was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 83% (39/47) of his 1st serve and 69% (18/26) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Brit was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Schoolkate once.
Broom has a fantastic match record in the last 6 years having won 71% of his matches (128-53). 25-11 on hard in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Broom has an aggregate66-26 match record in the last 6 years on hard.
Charles’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M25 Bath,M25 Calabasas,M15 Heraklion and M15 Helsinki.
The Brit has an aggregate 37-20 win-loss record in 2022, 25-11 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nonthaburi 2 Challenger
The Brit has never competed in this tournament before.
Ben Patael
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2-4 | 2-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 48-26 | 44-22 | 4-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 27-14 | 25-9 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 8-5 | 4-1 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 21-26 | 7-11 | 6-8 | 8-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 385, the Israeli got to the 2nd round after beating Anapat Timangkul 6-1 6-2, Daniel Cukierman 7-63 6-1 and Alastair Gray 6-3 4-6 6-4.
In the 1st round, Fatael defeated Gray (6-3 4-6 6-4). During the match Fatael scored 84 points vs Gray’s 78. Fatael was quite aggressive to blast 43 winners.
About the serving games, Fatael scored 8 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Ben Patael lost the serve 3 times and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Fatael put 72% of his first serves in, winning 78% (43/55) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (10/21) on the 2nd serve. The Israeli broke Gray 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
The Israeli’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M15 Sharm ElSheikh,M15 Akko,M15 Raanana,Nova,M15 Kfar Saba and M15 Herzlia.
The Israeli has a composed 47-19 win-loss record in 2022, 43-15 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Broom | Fatael |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 6 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 68 | 64 |
| Pts | 209-181 | 209-157 |
| Total Points | 390 | 366 |
| Winners | 102 | 94 |
| %Winners | 49% | 45% |
Both Broom and Fatael played 3 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Ben Patael surrendered 1 set while Charles Broom hasn’t lost a set so far. Broom has played 1 set(s) less than Fatael (6 vs 7). However, it’s interesting to notice that Broom played 4 games more than Fatael. Broom scored 102 winners (49% of the total points). On the other side, Ben bagged 94 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Broom | Fatael |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 25 | 14 |
| Avg per match | 8.3 | 4.7 |
| 1st in | 126/202 | 124/170 |
| %1st in | 62% | 73% |
| 1st pts | 102/126 | 94/124 |
| %1st pts | 81% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 51/76 | 29/46 |
| %2nd pts | 67% | 63% |
Broom bagged 25 aces (8.3 per match). Fatael fired 14 aces (4.7 per match). Broom won 81% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 67% of the points. On the other side, Fatael won 76% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Broom | Fatael |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 13 |
| Converted | 4/6 | 13/23 |
| % Converted | 67% | 57% |
| Conceded | 10 | 9 |
| Saved | 10 | 5 |
| % Saved | 100% | 56% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 4 |
Broom broke his opponents 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. Broom pretty solid on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 10 break points. Fatael broke his opponents 13 times with a 57% conversion rate. Fatael conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 56% of the break points that he conceded.
| Broom | |||||
| Q1 Rawat |
Q3 Palan |
R1 Schoolkate |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | 6-4 7-62 | 7-5 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 23 | 25 | 68 | |
| pts | 61-58 | 69-57 | 79-66 | 209-181 | |
| Total points | 119 | 126 | 145 | 390 | |
| Winners | 28 | 35 | 39 | 102 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 51% | 49% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | 11 | 25 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 0 | 2 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 39/69 | 40/60 | 47/73 | 126/202 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 67% | 64% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 28/39 | 35/40 | 39/47 | 102/126 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 88% | 83% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/30 | 13/20 | 18/26 | 51/76 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 65% | 69% | 67% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |
| Converted | 2/2 | 1/3 | 1/1 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 33% | 100% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 0 | 2 | 10 | |
| Saved | 8/8 | 0/0 | 2/2 | 10 | |
| Saved % | 100% | – | 100% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Fatael | |||||
| Q1 Timangkul |
Q3 Cukierman |
R1 Gray |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-2 | 7-63 6-1 | 6-3 4-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 20 | 29 | 64 | |
| pts | 52-28 | 73-51 | 84-78 | 209-157 | |
| Total points | 80 | 124 | 162 | 366 | |
| Winners | 22 | 29 | 43 | 94 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 40% | 51% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 5 | 1 | 8 | 14 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 26/34 | 43/60 | 55/76 | 124/170 | |
| % 1st in | 76% | 72% | 72% | 73% | |
| 1st pts | 22/26 | 29/43 | 43/55 | 94/124 | |
| % 1st pts | 85% | 67% | 78% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/8 | 13/17 | 10/21 | 29/46 | |
| % 2nd pts | 75% | 76% | 48% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 4 | 4 | 13 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 4/7 | 4/8 | 13/23 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 57% | 50% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 5 | 4 | 9 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 4/5 | 1/4 | 5 | |
| Saved % | – | 80% | 25% | 35% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLWWWLLW
Tennis Scores in Nonthaburi 2 Challenger
- Valentin VacherotVacherot – Akira SantillanSantillan (6-1 2-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – Alibek KachmazovKachmazov (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Daniel CukiermanCukierman (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Ben PataelPatael – Alastair GrayGray (6-3 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Arthur CazauxCazaux – Krittin KoaykulKoaykul (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Charles BroomBroom – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (7-5 7-64) – See score progression
- Dane SweenySweeny – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (3-6 6-0 6-0) – See score progression
- Billy HarrisHarris – Yunseong ChungChung (6-3 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy – Benjamin LockLock (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (6-3 7-68) – See score progression
- Gabriel DecampsDecamps – Sergey FominFomin (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Illya MarchenkoMarchenko – Yshai OlielOliel (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Omar JasikaJasika – Prajnesh GunneswaranGunneswaran (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Kasidit SamrejSamrej – Thanapet ChantaChanta (7-66 6-1) – See score progression
- Federico GaioGaio – Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete (6-77 6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – Alibek KachmazovKachmazov (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Valentin VacherotVacherot – Akira SantillanSantillan (6-1 2-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Billy HarrisHarris – Yunseong ChungChung (6-3 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Illya MarchenkoMarchenko – Omar JasikaJasika (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nam Hoang LyHoang Ly – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – Valentin VacherotVacherot (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriel DecampsDecamps – Kasidit SamrejSamrej (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Charles BroomBroom – Ben PataelPatael (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dane SweenySweeny – Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy (0-0) – H2H and prediction
