Marek Gengel and Martin Cuevas will face off in the 2nd round of the Prague 3 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 10:00 am on COURT 5. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Martin Cuevas who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Martin Cuevas is the pick to win this match.
Martin Cuevas -> 1.46
Marek Gengel -> 2.64
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Marek Gengel vs. Martin Cuevas
There is no head to head record between Marek Gengel and Martin Cuevas since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Marek Gengel
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 25-9 | 25-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 16-27 | 14-15 | 0-7 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 42-29 | 28-16 | 4-8 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 52-28 | 47-14 | 3-8 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 20-17 | 16-12 | 2-2 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 392, Gengel reached the 2nd round after beating Oriol Roca Batalla 6-4 6-74 6-3.
In the 1st round, Marek defeated Roca Batalla (6-4 6-74 6-3). During the match, Gengel scored 110 points vs Roca Batalla’s 104. The Czech was quite aggressive to blast 40 winners.
Talking about the service games, Gengel fired 7 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Marek Gengel lost the serve 5 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Gengel put 56% of his first serves in, winning 66% (40/61) of the points behind his 1st serve and 40% (19/48) on the 2nd serve. Marek broke Roca Batalla 7 times after converting 58% of his break points (7/12).
Gengel has a winning record in the last 7 years having won 56% of his matches (197-157). 4-7 on clay in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Gengel has an overall30-54 win-loss record in the last 7 years on clay.
Marek’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M25 Sharm ElSheikh.
The Czech has an overall 20-17 win-loss record in 2022, 4-7 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Prague 3 Challenger
Martin Cuevas
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 7-7 | 0-0 | 7-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 30-23 | 0-1 | 30-22 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 14-15 | 0-1 | 14-14 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 14-14 | 6-4 | 8-9 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 415, the Uruguayan got to the 2nd round after beating Jiri Jenicek 7-5 4-6 6-1, Francesco Forti 6-4 3-6 6-3 and Martin Krumich 2-6 6-3 6-3.
In the 1st round against Krumich, Martin recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 6-3 6-3). During the match Cuevas scored 80 points vs Krumich’s 77. Martin was extremely aggressive to blast 28 winners.
About the serving games, Cuevas blasted 4 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Martin Cuevas was very efficient on serve to win 76% (28/37) of his 1st serve and 55% (17/31) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve 3 times. Cuevas broke Krumich 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
The Uruguayan’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M15 Antalya and M25 Antalya.
The Uruguayan has an overall 26-13 win-loss record in 2022, 26-13 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Prague 3 Challenger
Martin has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gengel | Cuevas |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 9 |
| Tot Games | 32 | 83 |
| Pts | 110-104 | 271-243 |
| Total Points | 214 | 514 |
| Winners | 40 | 97 |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% |
Gengel played 1 match while Cuevas competed in 3 matches. Cuevas started his run from the qualifications while Gengel had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Marek Gengel lost 1 set, while Martin Cuevas dropped 3 sets. Gengel has played 6 set(s) less than Cuevas (3 vs 9). Therefore, Gengel played 51 games less than Cuevas. Gengel scored 40 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, Cuevas scored 97 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gengel | Cuevas |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 18 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 6 |
| 1st in | 61/109 | 120/242 |
| %1st in | 56% | 50% |
| 1st pts | 40/61 | 97/120 |
| %1st pts | 66% | 81% |
| 2nd pts | 19/48 | 62/122 |
| %2nd pts | 40% | 51% |
Gengel bagged 7 aces . Cuevas managed to score 18 aces (6 per match). Gengel won 66% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 40% of the points. On the other side, Cuevas won 81% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 51% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gengel | Cuevas |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 11 |
| Converted | 7/12 | 11/23 |
| % Converted | 58% | 48% |
| Conceded | 11 | 15 |
| Saved | 6 | 8 |
| % Saved | 55% | 53% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 7 |
The Czech broke his opponent 7 times with a 58% conversion rate. The Czech conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 55% of the break points that he conceded. Cuevas broke his opponents 11 times with a 48% conversion rate. Martin conceded his serve 7 times and he saved 53% of the break points that he conceded.
| Gengel | |||
| R1 Roca Batalla |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-74 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 32 | |
| pts | 110-104 | 110-104 | |
| Total points | 214 | 214 | |
| Winners | 40 | 40 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 61/109 | 61/109 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 40/61 | 40/61 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/48 | 19/48 | |
| % 2nd pts | 40% | 40% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/12 | 7/12 | |
| Converted % | 58% | 58% | |
| Conceded | 11 | 11 | |
| Saved | 6/11 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 55% | 55% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
| Cuevas | |||||
| Q1 Jenicek |
Q3 Forti |
R1 Krumich |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 4-6 6-1 | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | 2-6 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 28 | 26 | 83 | |
| pts | 97-80 | 94-86 | 80-77 | 271-243 | |
| Total points | 177 | 180 | 157 | 514 | |
| Winners | 29 | 40 | 28 | 97 | |
| %Winners | 30% | 43% | 35% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 9 | 5 | 4 | 18 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 9 | 4 | 18 | |
| 1st in | 36/84 | 47/90 | 37/68 | 120/242 | |
| % 1st in | 43% | 52% | 54% | 50% | |
| 1st pts | 29/36 | 40/47 | 28/37 | 97/120 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 85% | 76% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 27/48 | 18/43 | 17/31 | 62/122 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 42% | 55% | 51% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 3 | 4 | 11 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 3/6 | 4/10 | 11/23 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 50% | 40% | 48% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 8 | 3 | 15 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 6/8 | 0/3 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 75% | 0% | 125% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWWWLWWW
LL Tennis Scores in Prague 3 Challenger
- Lucas GerchGerch – Adrian AndreevAndreev (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Mariano NavoneNavone – Henri SquireSquire (7-5 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Matteo GiganteGigante – Michael VrbenskyVrbensky (6-2 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Joao DominguesDomingues – Vitaliy SachkoSachko (7-5 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Lukas RosolRosol – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Martin CuevasCuevas – Marek GengelGengel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Joao DominguesDomingues – Mariano NavoneNavone (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Petr NouzaNouza – Oleksii KrutykhKrutykh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
