
Barbora Krejcikova and Bernarda Pera will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Tennis in the Land for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 1:00 pm on Motorola Edge Stadium. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Barbora Krejcikova who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Barbora Krejcikova is the pick to win this match.
Barbora Krejcikova -> 1.85
Bernarda Pera -> 1.95
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Barbora Krejcikova vs. Bernarda Pera
There is no head to head record between Barbora Krejcikova and Bernarda Pera since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Barbora Krejcikova
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 16-10 | 11-5 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 21-16 | 7-7 | 3-5 | 2-2 | 9-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 34-19 | 22-11 | 5-5 | 2-1 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 25-15 | 12-10 | 2-3 | 9-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 45-19 | 27-13 | 15-3 | 0-2 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 23, Barbora got to the 2nd round after beating Francesca Di Lorenzo 6-3 6-1.
In the 1st round, Barbora had a good straight sets win against Di Lorenzo (6-3 6-1). During the match, Krejcikova scored 61 points vs Di Lorenzo’s 41. Krejcikova was quite aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Regarding the service games, Krejcikova bagged 4 aces and she committed only 3 double faults. Barbora Krejcikova lost the serve once and she saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Krejcikova put 63% of her first serves in, winning 79% (23/29) of the points behind her 1st serve and 41% (7/17) on the 2nd serve. Krejcikova broke Di Lorenzo 5 times after converting 45% of her break points (5/11).
Krejcikova has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 64% of her matches (304-169). 11-7 on hard in 2022. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Krejcikova has an aggregate 90-66 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
Krejcikova’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in Sydney.
Barbora has a composed 15-12 win-loss record in 2022, 11-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Cleveland
Barbora has never competed in this tournament before.
Bernarda Pera
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 16-23 | 8-11 | 5-8 | 2-1 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 37-24 | 21-16 | 10-5 | 0-0 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 20-23 | 9-12 | 10-7 | 0-1 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 33-20 | 10-9 | 19-6 | 4-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 19-24 | 5-11 | 8-8 | 4-3 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 51, Pera got to the 2nd round after defeating Eri Hozumi 6-1 6-2.
In the 1st round, The American had a good straight sets win against Hozumi (6-1 6-2). During the match Pera scored 58 points vs Hozumi’s 36. Pera was exceptionally aggressive to blast 20 winners.
Talking about serving, Pera bagged 3 aces and she committed only 3 double faults. Bernarda Pera lost the serve once. Furthermore, Pera put 63% of her first serves in, winning 74% (20/27) of the points behind her 1st serve and 44% (7/16) on the 2nd serve. Pera broke Hozumi 6 times after converting 75% of her break points (6/8).
Her best result of the current season was winning the title in in Budapest where she beat Aleksandra Krunic in the final 6-3 6-3 and in in Hamburg where she beat Anett Kontaveit in the final 6-2 6-4.
Pera has an overall 28-14 win-loss record in 2022, 7-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Cleveland
Previously, her best result was reaching the 1st round in 2021. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Krejcikova | Pera |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 15 |
| Pts | 61-41 | 58-36 |
| Total Points | 102 | 94 |
| Winners | 23 | 20 |
| %Winners | 38% | 34% |
Both Krejcikova and Pera played 1 match. Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Krejcikova and Pera have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Krejcikova played 1 game more than Pera. Barbora scored 23 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Bernarda recorded 20 winners (34%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Krejcikova | Pera |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 3 |
| 1st in | 29/46 | 27/43 |
| %1st in | 63% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 23/29 | 20/27 |
| %1st pts | 79% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 7/17 | 7/16 |
| %2nd pts | 41% | 44% |
Krejcikova managed to score 4 aces . Pera blasted 3 aces . Krejcikova won 79% points on her first serve. She extremely effective on her second serve to win 41% of the points. On the other side, Pera won 74% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 44% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Krejcikova | Pera |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 6 |
| Converted | 5/11 | 6/8 |
| % Converted | 45% | 75% |
| Conceded | 3 | 1 |
| Saved | 2 | 0 |
| % Saved | 67% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Barbora broke her opponent 5 times with a 45% conversion rate. Krejcikova dropped her serve once and she saved 67% of the break points that she conceded. Pera broke her opponent 6 times with a 75% conversion rate. Pera conceded her serve once and she saved 0% of the break points that she conceded.
| Krejcikova | |||
| R1 Di |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 61-41 | 61-41 | |
| Total points | 102 | 102 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 29/46 | 29/46 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 23/29 | 23/29 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/17 | 7/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 41% | 41% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/11 | 5/11 | |
| Converted % | 45% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Pera | |||
| R1 Hozumi |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 58-36 | 58-36 | |
| Total points | 94 | 94 | |
| Winners | 20 | 20 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 27/43 | 27/43 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 20/27 | 20/27 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/16 | 7/16 | |
| % 2nd pts | 44% | 44% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/8 | 6/8 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWLWWLWW
LLLLWLLLWL Tennis Scores in Cleveland
- Alize CornetCornet – Clara TausonTauson (6-3 7-61) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Aliaksandra SasnovichSasnovich – Sara Sorribes TormoSorribes Tormo (4-6 6-3 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Sofia KeninKenin – Irina-Camelia BeguBegu (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Magda LinetteLinette – Sorana CirsteaCirstea (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Joris De LooreDe Loore – Viktor GalovicGalovic (6-4 3-6 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Christian LindellLindell – Grzegorz PanfilPanfil (6-1 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Marco BortolottiBortolotti – Frederico GilGil (6-1 6-0) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Andrea BassoBasso (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Michael LinzerLinzer – Riccardo BalzeraniBalzerani (6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alexandre MullerMuller – Corrado SummariaSummaria (6-71 6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Barbora KrejcikovaKrejcikova – Bernarda PeraPera (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Laura SiegemundSiegemund – Ludmilla SamsonovaSamsonova (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Madison BrengleBrengle – Ekaterina AlexandrovaAlexandrova (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Shuai ZhangZhang – Martina TrevisanTrevisan (2-0) – H2H and prediction




