Tristan Schoolkate and Seong Chan Hong will square off in the qualifications of the Nonthaburi 1 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:30 pm on COURT 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Seong Chan Hong who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Seong Chan Hong is the pick to win this match.
Seong Chan Hong -> 1.55
Tristan Schoolkate -> 2.32
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Tristan Schoolkate vs. Seong Chan Hong
There is no head to head record between Tristan Schoolkate and Seong Chan Hong since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Tristan Schoolkate
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 25-18 | 20-12 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 5-4 | 0-0 |
2023 | 44-30 | 30-23 | 4-4 | 2-2 | 8-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 48-29 | 24-15 | 17-11 | 0-0 | 7-3 | 0-0 |
2021 | 24-20 | 8-9 | 3-5 | 11-5 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
2020 | 1-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 409 (career-high), Schoolkate got to the qualifications after beating Krittin Koaykul 6-3 6-1.
In the qualifications, Tristan had a good straight sets win against Koaykul (6-3 6-1). During the match, Schoolkate scored 55 points vs Koaykul’s 31. Schoolkate was very aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Regarding the service games, Schoolkate scored 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Tristan Schoolkate was pretty effective on serve to win 95% (21/22) of his 1st serve and 79% (11/14) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Schoolkate broke Koaykul 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Schoolkate has a winning win-loss record in the last 4 years having won 57% of his matches (66-49). 8-6 on hard in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Schoolkate has an overall26-23 win-loss record in the last 4 years on hard.
Schoolkate’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M25 Canberra and M15 Cairo.
The Australian has a compiled 32-20 win-loss record in 2022, 8-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nonthaburi 1 Challenger
Tristan has never competed in this tournament before.
Seong Chan Hong
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 27-18 | 27-14 | 0-1 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 27-34 | 17-18 | 5-6 | 5-6 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
2022 | 40-18 | 36-12 | 4-3 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 17-8 | 7-3 | 10-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 478, Seong reached the qualifications after defeating Stuart Parker 6-3 1-6 6-3.
In the qualifications, The Korean defeated Parker (6-3 1-6 6-3). During the match Chan Hong scored 73 points vs Parker’s 67. Chan Hong was extremely aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Talking about serving, Chan Hong blasted 13 aces and he was quite steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Seong Chan Hong lost the serve 3 times and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Chan Hong put 69% of his first serves in, winning 70% (35/50) of the points behind his 1st serve and 59% (13/22) on the 2nd serve. Chan Hong broke Parker 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Seong’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M15 Chiang Rai and M25 Harmon.
Chan Hong has a composed 25-9 win-loss record in 2022, 21-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Schoolkate | Chan Hong |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
Tot Games | 16 | 25 |
Pts | 55-31 | 73-67 |
Total Points | 86 | 140 |
Winners | 21 | 35 |
%Winners | 38% | 48% |
Both Schoolkate and Chan Hong played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Seong Chan Hong lost 1 set while Tristan Schoolkate hasn’t lost a set so far. Schoolkate has played 1 set(s) less than Chan Hong (2 vs 3). Therefore, Schoolkate played 9 games less than Chan Hong. Schoolkate scored 21 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Seong scored 35 winners (48%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Schoolkate | Chan Hong |
---|---|---|
Aces | 3 | 13 |
Avg per match | 3 | 13 |
1st in | 22/36 | 50/72 |
%1st in | 61% | 69% |
1st pts | 21/22 | 35/50 |
%1st pts | 95% | 70% |
2nd pts | 11/14 | 13/22 |
%2nd pts | 79% | 59% |
Schoolkate struck 3 aces . Chan Hong recorded 13 aces . Schoolkate won 95% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 79% of the points. On the other side, Chan Hong won 70% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Schoolkate | Chan Hong |
---|---|---|
Won | 4 | 3 |
Converted | 4/7 | 3/7 |
% Converted | 57% | 43% |
Conceded | 0 | 5 |
Saved | 0 | 2 |
% Saved | 0% | 40% |
Times Broken | 0 | 3 |
Schoolkate broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. The Australian pretty effective on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points. Chan Hong broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. The Korean conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 40% of the break points that he conceded.
Schoolkate | |||
Q1 Koaykul |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
pts | 55-31 | 55-31 | |
Total points | 86 | 86 | |
Winners | 21 | 21 | |
%Winners | 38% | 38% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 3 | 3 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 22/36 | 22/36 | |
% 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
1st pts | 21/22 | 21/22 | |
% 1st pts | 95% | 95% | |
2nd pts | 11/14 | 11/14 | |
% 2nd pts | 79% | 79% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
Saved % | – | 0% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Chan Hong | |||
Q1 Parker |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 1-6 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 25 | 25 | |
pts | 73-67 | 73-67 | |
Total points | 140 | 140 | |
Winners | 35 | 35 | |
%Winners | 48% | 48% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 13 | 13 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
1st in | 50/72 | 50/72 | |
% 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
1st pts | 35/50 | 35/50 | |
% 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
2nd pts | 13/22 | 13/22 | |
% 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
Saved | 2/5 | 2 | |
Saved % | 40% | 40% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Nonthaburi 1 Challenger
- Gage BrymerBrymer – Timo LegoutLegout (6-2 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jason JungJung – Illya MarchenkoMarchenko (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Dayne KellyKelly – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy – Prajnesh GunneswaranGunneswaran (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Akira SantillanSantillan – Wishaya TrongcharoenchaikulTrongcharoenchaikul (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Billy HarrisHarris – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Valentin VacherotVacherot – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yshai OlielOliel – Federico GaioGaio (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nicola KuhnKuhn – Benjamin LockLock (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sergey FominFomin – Gabriel DecampsDecamps (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yuta ShimizuShimizu – Daniel CukiermanCukierman (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ray HoHo – Kyrian JacquetJacquet (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alastair GrayGray – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Omar JasikaJasika (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dane SweenySweeny – Yuttana CharoenphonCharoenphon (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Seong Chan HongChan Hong (0-0) – H2H and prediction