Daniel Elahi Galan and Cedrik-Marcel Stebe will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Santo Domingo Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 2:00 pm on ESTADIO MITUR. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daniel Elahi Galan who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Daniel Elahi Galan is the pick to win this match.
Daniel Elahi Galan -> 1.41
Cedrik-Marcel Stebe -> 2.82
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Daniel Elahi Galan vs. Cedrik-Marcel Stebe
This will be the 2nd time that Daniel Elahi Galan and Cedrik-Marcel Stebe clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Stebe (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they played, Stebe won 6-4 6-2 in the qualifications in the Caltanissetta Challenger back in 2017.
Daniel Elahi Galan
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 9-11 | 3-5 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 32-34 | 4-12 | 23-19 | 0-1 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 48-28 | 14-7 | 33-17 | 0-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 28-32 | 6-9 | 19-16 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 31-18 | 14-8 | 17-7 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 99, the Colombian got to the 2nd round after beating Facundo Juarez 6-3 6-2.
In the 1st round, Elahi Galan Riveros had a good straight sets win against Juarez (6-3 6-2). During the match, Elahi Galan Riveros scored 71 points vs Juarez’s 54. The Colombian was quite aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about the service games, Elahi Galan Riveros bagged 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Daniel Elahi Galan conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 5 break points. Furthermore, Elahi Galan Riveros put 66% of his first serves in, winning 70% (30/43) of the points behind his 1st serve and 64% (14/22) on the 2nd serve. The Colombian broke Juarez 3 times after converting 25% of his break points (3/12).
Elahi Galan Riveros has a good match record in the last 10 years having won 56% of his matches (310-240). 30-16 on clay in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Elahi Galan Riveros has an aggregate 216-146 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
Elahi Galan Riveros’s best result of the season was getting to the final in the Concepcion Challenger and the Sarasota Challenger.
Daniel has a compiled 36-21 win-loss record in 2022, 30-16 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Santo Domingo Challenger
Cedrik-Marcel Stebe
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 28-25 | 2-6 | 10-13 | 15-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 14-20 | 4-7 | 9-9 | 1-1 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 18-11 | 5-4 | 4-4 | 9-2 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2019 | 18-18 | 1-3 | 6-8 | 11-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 250, Stebe got to the 2nd round after beating Genaro Alberto Olivieri 6-3 2-6 6-2.
In the 1st round, The German defeated Alberto Olivieri (6-3 2-6 6-2). During the match Stebe scored 95 points vs Alberto Olivieri’s 81. The German was pretty aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Talking about serving, Stebe scored 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Cedrik-Marcel Stebe lost the serve 5 times and he saved 11 break points. Furthermore, Stebe put 71% of his first serves in, winning 57% (37/65) of the points behind his 1st serve and 58% (15/26) on the 2nd serve. Cedrik-Marcel broke Alberto Olivieri 6 times after converting 46% of his break points (6/13).
The German’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in the Forli 1 Challenger,the Forli 3 Challenger and the Lugano Challenger.
Cedrik-Marcel has a composed 21-20 win-loss record in 2022, 5-10 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Elahi Galan Riveros | Stebe |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 25 |
| Pts | 71-54 | 95-81 |
| Total Points | 125 | 176 |
| Winners | 30 | 37 |
| %Winners | 42% | 39% |
Both Elahi Galan Riveros and Stebe played 1 match. At the moment, Cedrik-Marcel Stebe conceded 1 set while Daniel Elahi Galan hasn’t dropped a set so far. Elahi Galan Riveros has played 1 set(s) less than Stebe (2 vs 3). Therefore, Elahi Galan Riveros played 8 games less than Stebe. Elahi Galan Riveros scored 30 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Stebe struck 37 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Elahi Galan Riveros | Stebe |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 2 |
| 1st in | 43/65 | 65/91 |
| %1st in | 66% | 71% |
| 1st pts | 30/43 | 37/65 |
| %1st pts | 70% | 57% |
| 2nd pts | 14/22 | 15/26 |
| %2nd pts | 64% | 58% |
Elahi Galan Riveros bagged 4 aces . Stebe blasted 2 aces . Elahi Galan Riveros won 70% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 64% of the points. On the other side, Stebe won 57% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Elahi Galan Riveros | Stebe |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 6 |
| Converted | 3/12 | 6/13 |
| % Converted | 25% | 46% |
| Conceded | 5 | 16 |
| Saved | 5 | 11 |
| % Saved | 100% | 69% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 5 |
Daniel broke his opponent 3 times with a 25% conversion rate. The Colombian pretty effective on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 5 break points. The German broke his opponent 6 times with a 46% conversion rate. Cedrik-Marcel conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 69% of the break points that he conceded.
| Elahi Galan Riveros | |||
| R1 Juarez |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 71-54 | 71-54 | |
| Total points | 125 | 125 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 43/65 | 43/65 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 30/43 | 30/43 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/22 | 14/22 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 64% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/12 | 3/12 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 5/5 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Stebe | |||
| R1 Alberto |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 2-6 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 25 | |
| pts | 95-81 | 95-81 | |
| Total points | 176 | 176 | |
| Winners | 37 | 37 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 65/91 | 65/91 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 37/65 | 37/65 | |
| % 1st pts | 57% | 57% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/26 | 15/26 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/13 | 6/13 | |
| Converted % | 46% | 46% | |
| Conceded | 16 | 16 | |
| Saved | 11/16 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 69% | 69% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
Head 2 Head
WLLWLWLLWL
Tennis Scores in Santo Domingo Challenger
- Nicolas AlvarezAlvarez – Nicolas BarrientosBarrientos (7-5 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Nick HardtHardt – Gonzalo LamaLama (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Facundo MenaMena – Patrick KypsonKypson (7-66 4-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Pedro CachinCachin – Gerald MelzerMelzer (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan – Facundo JuarezJuarez (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante – Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas (3-6 6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi – Roberto QuirozQuiroz (1-6 5-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Renzo OlivoOlivo – Gonzalo BuenoBueno (6-2 4-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Roman Andres BurruchagaAndres Burruchaga – Nicolas MejiaMejia (6-2 2-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli – Riccardo BonadioBonadio (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe – Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri (6-3 2-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Peter BertranBertran (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – Gonzalo VillanuevaVillanueva (6-0 7-5) – See score progression
- Federico DelbonisDelbonis – Daniel Dutra Da SilvaDutra Da Silva (3-6 6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Francisco ComesanaComesana (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Nick HardtHardt – Gonzalo LamaLama (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante – Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas (3-6 6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli – Riccardo BonadioBonadio (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Renzo OlivoOlivo – Gonzalo BuenoBueno (6-2 4-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Roman Andres BurruchagaAndres Burruchaga – Nicolas MejiaMejia (6-2 2-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – Pedro Boscardin DiasBoscardin Dias (0-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi – Roberto QuirozQuiroz (1-6 5-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Pedro CachinCachin – Gerald MelzerMelzer (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi – Pedro CachinCachin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Federico DelbonisDelbonis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo MenaMena – Nicolas AlvarezAlvarez (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – Damir DzumhurDzumhur (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan – Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nick HardtHardt – Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli – Renzo OlivoOlivo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro Boscardin DiasBoscardin Dias – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
