Adrian Andreev and Tristan Lamasine will face off in the qualifications of the Meerbusch Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 1:00 pm on STM Court. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Adrian Andreev who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Adrian Andreev is the pick to win this match.
Adrian Andreev -> 1.44
Tristan Lamasine -> 2.62
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Adrian Andreev vs. Tristan Lamasine
This will be the 2nd time that Adrian Andreev and Tristan Lamasine face off. The head to head is 1-0 for Andreev (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they played each other, Andreev won 6-4 6-3 in the 2nd round in M25 Wetzlar back in August 2022.
Adrian Andreev
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 35-27 | 7-4 | 25-17 | 3-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 26-29 | 7-7 | 16-16 | 3-4 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
2022 | 49-29 | 7-7 | 29-15 | 13-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 27-22 | 6-7 | 20-9 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 22-8 | 10-2 | 12-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 353, Andreev reached the qualifications after beating Matthias Bachinger 6-2 7-5.
In the qualifications, The Bulgarian had a good straight sets win against Bachinger (6-2 7-5). During the match, Andreev scored 73 points vs Bachinger’s 55. The Bulgarian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Regarding the service games, Andreev blasted 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Adrian Andreev lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Andreev put 47% of his first serves in, winning 85% (23/27) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (14/30) on the 2nd serve. Adrian broke Bachinger 5 times after converting 42% of his break points (5/12).
Andreev has a winning win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 58% of his matches (107-77). 17-10 on clay in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Andreev has an overall71-40 match record in the last 6 years on clay.
Adrian’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in the Forli 2 Challenger,M25 Bakersfield and M25 Wetzlar.
Andreev has an aggregate 29-18 win-loss record in 2022, 17-10 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Meerbusch Challenger
The Bulgarian has never competed in this tournament before.
Tristan Lamasine
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 24-31 | 0-3 | 5-17 | 19-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 59-23 | 4-1 | 23-9 | 30-11 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
2022 | 22-27 | 0-0 | 14-18 | 8-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 23-27 | 3-3 | 14-17 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
2020 | 11-16 | 6-3 | 2-6 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 478, Lamasine got to the qualifications after defeating Raphael Collignon 6-1 6-4.
In the qualifications, Lamasine had a good straight sets win against Collignon (6-1 6-4). During the match Lamasine scored 57 points vs Collignon’s 45. The French player was quite aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Talking about serving, Lamasine was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 2 double faults. Tristan Lamasine was quite effective on serve to win 71% (22/31) of his 1st serve and 64% (16/25) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Tristan broke Collignon 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Tristan has an overall 16-20 win-loss record in 2022, 11-14 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Andreev | Lamasine |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 20 | 17 |
Pts | 73-55 | 57-45 |
Total Points | 128 | 102 |
Winners | 23 | 22 |
%Winners | 32% | 39% |
Both Andreev and Lamasine played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Andreev and Lamasine have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Andreev played 3 games more than Lamasine. Andreev scored 23 winners (32% of the total points). On the other side, Tristan recorded 22 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Andreev | Lamasine |
---|---|---|
Aces | 3 | 0 |
Avg per match | 3 | 0 |
1st in | 27/57 | 31/56 |
%1st in | 47% | 55% |
1st pts | 23/27 | 22/31 |
%1st pts | 85% | 71% |
2nd pts | 14/30 | 16/25 |
%2nd pts | 47% | 64% |
Andreev scored 3 aces . Lamasine didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Andreev won 85% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, Lamasine won 71% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 64% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Andreev | Lamasine |
---|---|---|
Won | 5 | 3 |
Converted | 5/12 | 3/6 |
% Converted | 42% | 50% |
Conceded | 5 | 0 |
Saved | 3 | 0 |
% Saved | 60% | 0% |
Times Broken | 2 | 0 |
The Bulgarian broke his opponent 5 times with a 42% conversion rate. Andreev lost his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded. The French player broke his opponent 3 times with a 50% conversion rate. Lamasine was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
Andreev | |||
Q1 Bachinger |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
pts | 73-55 | 73-55 | |
Total points | 128 | 128 | |
Winners | 23 | 23 | |
%Winners | 32% | 32% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 3 | 3 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 27/57 | 27/57 | |
% 1st in | 47% | 47% | |
1st pts | 23/27 | 23/27 | |
% 1st pts | 85% | 85% | |
2nd pts | 14/30 | 14/30 | |
% 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/12 | 5/12 | |
Converted % | 42% | 42% | |
Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Lamasine | |||
Q1 Collignon |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
pts | 57-45 | 57-45 | |
Total points | 102 | 102 | |
Winners | 22 | 22 | |
%Winners | 39% | 39% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 0 | 0 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 31/56 | 31/56 | |
% 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
1st pts | 22/31 | 22/31 | |
% 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
2nd pts | 16/25 | 16/25 | |
% 2nd pts | 64% | 64% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/6 | 3/6 | |
Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
Saved % | – | 0% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Andrea ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Denis YevseyevYevseyev – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Riccardo BonadioBonadio – Franco AgamenoneAgamenone (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexey VatutinVatutin – Gauthier OnclinOnclin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva – Alexander ShevchenkoShevchenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dennis NovakNovak – Vit KoprivaKopriva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nikola MilojevicMilojevic – Carlos Lopez MontagudLopez Montagud (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Jonas ForejtekForejtek (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – Filip HoranskyHoransky (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild – Lucas GerchGerch (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dan AddedAdded – Sumit NagalNagal (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Damir DzumhurDzumhur (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Clement TaburTabur – Oscar Jose GutierrezJose Gutierrez (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Adrian AndreevAndreev – Tristan LamasineLamasine (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Jan-Lennard StruffStruff (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oleksii KrutykhKrutykh – (0-0) – H2H and prediction