Viktor Durasovic and Elmar Ejupovic will square off in the qualifications of the San Marino Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 10:00 am on COURT 2. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Viktor Durasovic who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Viktor Durasovic is the pick to win this match.
Viktor Durasovic -> 1.81
Elmar Ejupovic -> 1.909
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Viktor Durasovic vs. Elmar Ejupovic
There is no head to head record between Viktor Durasovic and Elmar Ejupovic since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Viktor Durasovic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 39-28 | 14-8 | 15-15 | 10-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 25-37 | 5-8 | 17-18 | 2-9 | 0-1 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 28-36 | 2-7 | 15-18 | 11-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 31-24 | 2-4 | 13-12 | 16-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 9-14 | 1-5 | 1-2 | 7-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 319, Viktor reached the qualifications after beating Christian Langmo 6-4 7-67.
In the qualifications, Durasovic had a good straight sets win against Langmo (6-4 7-67). During the match, Durasovic scored 80 points vs Langmo’s 68. Durasovic was very aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Regarding the service games, Durasovic scored 7 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Viktor Durasovic was extremely efficient on serve to win 85% (28/33) of his 1st serve and 72% (21/29) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Norwegian broke Langmo once after converting 13% of his break points (1/8).
Durasovic has a winning win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 54% of his matches (245-206). 10-13 on clay in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Durasovic has a composed71-76 record in the last 8 years on clay.
Durasovic has an aggregate 15-24 win-loss record in 2022, 10-13 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the San Marino Challenger
Durasovic has never competed in this tournament before.
Elmar Ejupovic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23-21 | 1-2 | 19-12 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2023 | 30-34 | 4-7 | 16-17 | 7-7 | 0-0 | 3-3 |
| 2022 | 46-28 | 4-2 | 32-19 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 7-2 |
| 2021 | 34-25 | 1-2 | 23-17 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
| 2020 | 18-8 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 10-3 |
Ranked no. 414, Ejupovic got to the qualifications after defeating Riccardo Balzerani 6-3 6-4.
In the qualifications, Elmar had a good straight sets win against Balzerani (6-3 6-4). During the match Ejupovic scored 67 points vs Balzerani’s 52. Elmar was pretty aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about serving, Ejupovic managed to score 10 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Elmar Ejupovic was quite efficient on serve to win 89% (31/35) of his 1st serve and 54% (14/26) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Elmar broke Balzerani twice after converting 67% of his break points (2/3).
The German has a composed 22-18 win-loss record in 2022, 15-12 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the San Marino Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2021. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Durasovic | Ejupovic |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 23 | 19 |
| Pts | 80-68 | 67-52 |
| Total Points | 148 | 119 |
| Winners | 28 | 31 |
| %Winners | 35% | 46% |
Both Durasovic and Ejupovic played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Durasovic and Ejupovic have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Durasovic played 4 games more than Ejupovic. The Norwegian scored 28 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, Elmar blasted 31 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Durasovic | Ejupovic |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 10 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 10 |
| 1st in | 33/62 | 35/61 |
| %1st in | 53% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 28/33 | 31/35 |
| %1st pts | 85% | 89% |
| 2nd pts | 21/29 | 14/26 |
| %2nd pts | 72% | 54% |
Durasovic managed to score 7 aces . Ejupovic recorded 10 aces . Durasovic won 85% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 72% of the points. On the other side, Ejupovic won 89% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Durasovic | Ejupovic |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 1 | 2 |
| Converted | 1/8 | 2/3 |
| % Converted | 13% | 67% |
| Conceded | 0 | 3 |
| Saved | 0 | 3 |
| % Saved | 0% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
The Norwegian broke his opponent once with a 13% conversion rate. Durasovic was rock solid on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 0 break points. The German broke his opponent twice with a 67% conversion rate. Elmar was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 3 break points.
| Durasovic | |||
| Q1 Langmo |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-67 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 80-68 | 80-68 | |
| Total points | 148 | 148 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 33/62 | 33/62 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 28/33 | 28/33 | |
| % 1st pts | 85% | 85% | |
| 2nd pts | 21/29 | 21/29 | |
| % 2nd pts | 72% | 72% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 1 | 1 | |
| Converted | 1/8 | 1/8 | |
| Converted % | 13% | 13% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Ejupovic | |||
| Q1 Balzerani |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 67-52 | 67-52 | |
| Total points | 119 | 119 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 10 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 35/61 | 35/61 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 31/35 | 31/35 | |
| % 1st pts | 89% | 89% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/26 | 14/26 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/3 | 2/3 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWLLWLWW
LLLWWWLWWW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Robin HaaseHaase – Otto VirtanenVirtanen (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marius CopilCopil – Valentin VacherotVacherot (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico GaioGaio – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jelle SelsSels – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Viktor DurasovicDurasovic – Elmar EjupovicEjupovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Matias ZukasZukas – Francesco FortiForti (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Carlos TabernerTaberner – Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander WeisWeis – Enrico Dalla ValleDalla Valle (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oleg PrihodkoPrihodko – Andrey ChepelevChepelev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo – Alexandre MullerMuller (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu – Ernests GulbisGulbis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Fabian MarozsanMarozsan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
