Holger Vitus Nodskov Rune and Jeff Wolf will square off in the 3rd round of the Citi Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 12:00 pm on COURT 4. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Holger Vitus Nodskov Rune who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Holger Vitus Nodskov Rune is the pick to win this match.
Holger Vitus Nodskov Rune -> 1.615
Jeff Wolf -> 2.31
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Holger Vitus Nodskov Rune vs. Jeff Wolf
There is no head to head record between Holger Vitus Nodskov Rune and Jeff Wolf since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Holger Vitus Nodskov Rune
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|
Ranked no. 28, the Dane got to the 3rd round after beating Benoit Paire 6-3 6-2.
In the 2nd round, Vitus Nodskov Rune had a good straight sets win against Paire (6-3 6-2). During the match, Vitus Nodskov Rune scored 68 points vs Paire’s 51. Holger was exceptionally aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Regarding the service games, Vitus Nodskov Rune blasted 4 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Holger Vitus Nodskov Rune conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 4 break points. Furthermore, Vitus Nodskov Rune put 58% of his first serves in, winning 82% (31/38) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (14/28) on the 2nd serve. The Dane broke Paire 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Vitus Nodskov Rune has a solid match record in the last 5 years having won 65% of his matches (140-75). 6-5 on hard in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Vitus Nodskov Rune has an aggregate18-16 record in the last 5 years on hard.
His best result of the current year was winning the title in in Munich where he defeated Botic Van De Zandschulp in the final 3-4 ret..
Holger has an aggregate 28-20 win-loss record in 2022, 6-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Washington
Vitus Nodskov Rune has never competed in this tournament before.
Jeff Wolf
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 6-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 17-26 | 11-16 | 6-9 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-26 | 16-13 | 5-5 | 6-4 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 43-29 | 23-15 | 8-4 | 12-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 16-11 | 7-7 | 0-0 | 9-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 99 (career-high), the American got to the 3rd round after defeating Taro Daniel 6-2 6-3 and Denis Shapovalov 6-2 6-75 6-3.
In the 2nd round, The American defeated Shapovalov (6-2 6-75 6-3). During the match Wolf scored 97 points vs Shapovalov’s 82. The American was exceptionally aggressive to blast 46 winners.
Talking about serving, Wolf made 3 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Jeff Wolf lost the serve twice and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Wolf put 66% of his first serves in, winning 81% (46/57) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (14/29) on the 2nd serve. Jeff broke Shapovalov 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The American has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 55% of the points he played.
Wolf’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in the Phoenix Challenger,the Savannah Challenger and the Orlando Challenger.
Wolf has a compiled 30-19 win-loss record in 2022, 19-10 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Washington
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2021. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Vitus Nodskov Rune | Wolf |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 47 |
| Pts | 68-51 | 159-129 |
| Total Points | 119 | 288 |
| Winners | 31 | 68 |
| %Winners | 46% | 43% |
Vitus Nodskov Rune played 1 match while Wolf competed in 2 matches. At the moment, Jeff Wolf conceded 1 set while Holger Vitus Nodskov Rune hasn’t lost a set so far. Vitus Nodskov Rune has played 3 set(s) less than Wolf (2 vs 5). Therefore, Vitus Nodskov Rune played 30 games less than Wolf. Vitus Nodskov Rune scored 31 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, The American scored 68 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Vitus Nodskov Rune | Wolf |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 11 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 5.5 |
| 1st in | 38/66 | 86/139 |
| %1st in | 58% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 31/38 | 68/86 |
| %1st pts | 82% | 79% |
| 2nd pts | 14/28 | 26/53 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 49% |
Vitus Nodskov Rune scored 4 aces . Wolf bagged 11 aces (5.5 per match). Vitus Nodskov Rune won 82% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Wolf won 79% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 49% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Vitus Nodskov Rune | Wolf |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 9 |
| Converted | 3/5 | 9/13 |
| % Converted | 60% | 69% |
| Conceded | 4 | 11 |
| Saved | 4 | 8 |
| % Saved | 100% | 73% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 |
The Dane broke his opponent 3 times with a 60% conversion rate. Holger pretty solid on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 4 break points. Jeff broke his opponents 9 times with a 69% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 73% of the break points that he conceded.
| Vitus Nodskov Rune | |||
| R2 Paire |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 68-51 | 68-51 | |
| Total points | 119 | 119 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 38/66 | 38/66 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 31/38 | 31/38 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/28 | 14/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/5 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 4/4 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Wolf | ||||
| R1 Daniel |
R2 Shapovalov |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-3 | 6-2 6-75 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 30 | 47 | |
| pts | 62-47 | 97-82 | 159-129 | |
| Total points | 109 | 179 | 288 | |
| Winners | 22 | 46 | 68 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 47% | 43% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 8 | 3 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 5 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 29/53 | 57/86 | 86/139 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 66% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 22/29 | 46/57 | 68/86 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 81% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/24 | 14/29 | 26/53 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 48% | 49% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 5 | 9 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 5/7 | 9/13 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 71% | 69% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 7 | 11 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 5/7 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 71% | 146% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Washington
- Daniel EvansEvans – Taylor Harry FritzHarry Fritz (3-6 7-66 4-1 ret.) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka – Karen KhachanovKhachanov (7-62 7-61) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Mikael YmerYmer – Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori (6-3 6-73 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Daniel EvansEvans – Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka (0-4) – H2H and prediction
- Grigor DimitrovDimitrov – Sebastian KordaKorda (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nick KyrgiosKyrgios – Reilly OpelkaOpelka (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Frances TiafoeTiafoe (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrey RublevRublev – Maxime CressyCressy (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Holger Vitus Nodskov RuneVitus Nodskov Rune – Jeff WolfWolf (0-0) – H2H and prediction
