Rebeka Masarova and Tena Lukas will clash against each other in the qualifications of the BNP Paribas Poland Open for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:00 pm on Court 3. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Rebeka Masarova who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Rebeka Masarova is the pick to win this match.
Rebeka Masarova -> 1.4
Tena Lukas -> 2.95
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Rebeka Masarova vs. Tena Lukas
This will be the 2nd time that Rebeka Masarova and Tena Lukas face off. The head to head is 1-0 for Masarova (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they locked horns, Masarova won 5-7 7-6(4) 7-6(4) in the 2nd round in the Vaihingen back in 2017.
Rebeka Masarova
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 25-29 | 11-14 | 12-11 | 0-1 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
2023 | 38-23 | 16-11 | 10-5 | 9-4 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
2022 | 34-26 | 8-8 | 21-15 | 5-1 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
2021 | 42-13 | 27-7 | 14-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 12-4 | 0-0 | 12-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 173, the Spaniard reached the qualifications after beating Weronika Baszak 6-3 6-4.
In the qualifications, Rebeka had a good straight sets win against Baszak (6-3 6-4). During the match, Masarova scored 86 points vs Baszak’s 70. Masarova was exceptionally aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about the service games, Masarova managed to score 6 aces and she committed only 5 double faults. Rebeka Masarova lost the serve twice and she saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Masarova put 59% of her first serves in, winning 78% (31/40) of the points behind her 1st serve and 36% (10/28) on the 2nd serve. Rebeka broke Baszak 5 times after converting 33% of her break points (5/15).
Masarova has a solid record in the last 7 years having won 67% of her matches (140-70). 12-8 on clay in 2022. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this competition, Masarova has a composed97-43 record in the last 7 years on clay.
The Spaniard’s best result of the year was getting to the final in the Bastad.
The Spaniard has an overall 16-16 win-loss record in 2022, 12-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Warsaw
Rebeka has never competed in this tournament before.
Tena Lukas
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 36-28 | 0-1 | 32-22 | 3-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 44-32 | 1-1 | 37-24 | 6-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 40-29 | 1-4 | 39-24 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2021 | 11-28 | 0-2 | 11-20 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
2020 | 9-11 | 0-1 | 3-3 | 6-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 209 (career-high), the Croatian got to the qualifications after beating Katarzyna Kawa 7-64 6-2.
In the qualifications, Lukas had a good straight sets win against Kawa (7-64 6-2). During the match Lukas scored 73 points vs Kawa’s 66. Lukas was exceptionally aggressive to blast 26 winners.
About the serving games, Lukas managed to score 8 aces and she committed only 9 double faults. Tena Lukas lost the serve 4 times and she saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Lukas put 57% of her first serves in, winning 65% (26/40) of the points behind her 1st serve and 40% (12/30) on the 2nd serve. Lukas broke Kawa 6 times after converting 43% of her break points (6/14).
The Croatian has an overall 29-16 win-loss record in 2022, 28-13 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Masarova | Lukas |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 19 | 21 |
Pts | 86-70 | 73-66 |
Total Points | 156 | 139 |
Winners | 31 | 26 |
%Winners | 36% | 36% |
Both Masarova and Lukas played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Masarova and Lukas have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Masarova played 2 games less than Lukas. Masarova scored 31 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, Tena bagged 26 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Masarova | Lukas |
---|---|---|
Aces | 6 | 8 |
Avg per match | 6 | 8 |
1st in | 40/68 | 40/70 |
%1st in | 59% | 57% |
1st pts | 31/40 | 26/40 |
%1st pts | 78% | 65% |
2nd pts | 10/28 | 12/30 |
%2nd pts | 36% | 40% |
Masarova bagged 6 aces . Lukas blasted 8 aces . Masarova won 78% points on her first serve. She was rock solid on her second serve to win 36% of the points. On the other side, Lukas won 65% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 40% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Masarova | Lukas |
---|---|---|
Won | 5 | 6 |
Converted | 5/15 | 6/14 |
% Converted | 33% | 43% |
Conceded | 10 | 9 |
Saved | 8 | 5 |
% Saved | 80% | 56% |
Times Broken | 2 | 4 |
Rebeka broke her opponent 5 times with a 33% conversion rate. The Spaniard surrendered her serve twice and she saved 80% of the break points that she conceded. Lukas broke her opponent 6 times with a 43% conversion rate. Tena conceded her serve 4 times and she saved 56% of the break points that she conceded.
Masarova | |||
Q1 Baszak |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
pts | 86-70 | 86-70 | |
Total points | 156 | 156 | |
Winners | 31 | 31 | |
%Winners | 36% | 36% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 6 | 6 | |
Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
1st in | 40/68 | 40/68 | |
% 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
1st pts | 31/40 | 31/40 | |
% 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
2nd pts | 10/28 | 10/28 | |
% 2nd pts | 36% | 36% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/15 | 5/15 | |
Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
Saved | 8/10 | 8 | |
Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Lukas | |||
Q1 Kawa |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-64 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
pts | 73-66 | 73-66 | |
Total points | 139 | 139 | |
Winners | 26 | 26 | |
%Winners | 36% | 36% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 8 | 8 | |
Double Faults | 9 | 9 | |
1st in | 40/70 | 40/70 | |
% 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
1st pts | 26/40 | 26/40 | |
% 1st pts | 65% | 65% | |
2nd pts | 12/30 | 12/30 | |
% 2nd pts | 40% | 40% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 6 | 6 | |
Converted | 6/14 | 6/14 | |
Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
Saved | 5/9 | 5 | |
Saved % | 56% | 56% | |
Times Broken | 4 | 4 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Warsaw
- Alexandra CadantuCadantu – Gabriela LeeLee (1-6 6-1 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jesika MaleckovaMaleckova – Kateryna BaindlBaindl (5-7 6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Arianne HartonoHartono – Laura PigossiPigossi (7-5 7-63) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Raluca Georgiana SerbanGeorgiana Serban – Despina PapamichailPapamichail (4-6 7-65 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Masaki OsafuneOsafune – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (1-6 7-65 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Sara ErraniErrani – Paula OrmaecheaOrmaechea (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tena LukasLukas – Rebeka MasarovaMasarova (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Iga SwiatekSwiatek – Magdalena FrechFrech (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elisabetta CocciarettoCocciaretto – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Misaki DoiDoi – Caroline GarciaGarcia (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jasmine PaoliniPaolini – Danka KovinicKovinic (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Clara BurelBurel – Anna SchmiedlovaSchmiedlova (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Arianne HartonoHartono – Viktorija GolubicGolubic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kristina MladenovicMladenovic – Anna BondarBondar (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Petra MarticMartic – Weronika FalkowskaFalkowska (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kateryna KozlovaKozlova – Irina-Camelia BeguBegu (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Nuria Parrizas-DiazParrizas-Diaz – Ana BogdanBogdan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jesika MaleckovaMaleckova – Katerina SiniakovaSiniakova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nadia PodoroskaPodoroska – Alexandra CadantuCadantu (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Maryna ZanevskaZanevska – Varvara GrachevaGracheva (0-2) – H2H and prediction