Franco Agamenone and Filip Horansky will face off in the 2nd round of the Verona Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 1:00 pm on CENTER. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Franco Agamenone who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Franco Agamenone is the pick to win this match.
Franco Agamenone -> 1.52
Filip Horansky -> 2.53
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Franco Agamenone vs. Filip Horansky
There is no head to head record between Franco Agamenone and Filip Horansky since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Franco Agamenone
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 15-27 | 1-4 | 13-19 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-29 | 0-3 | 24-24 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 35-32 | 6-3 | 26-24 | 3-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 81-23 | 21-5 | 60-18 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 22-8 | 0-0 | 22-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 144, Agamenone reached the 2nd round after defeating Salvatore Caruso 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round, The Italian had a good straight sets win against Caruso (6-3 6-4). During the match, Agamenone scored 62 points vs Caruso’s 51. Agamenone was pretty aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Regarding the service games, Agamenone was unable to score even 1 ace during the match and he committed only 5 double faults. Franco Agamenone lost the serve twice and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Agamenone put 71% of his first serves in, winning 71% (30/42) of the points behind his 1st serve and 41% (7/17) on the 2nd serve. Franco was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Caruso 4 times.
Agamenone has a solid win-loss record in the last 9 years having won 63% of his matches (298-173). 10-11 on clay in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Agamenone has a composed263-151 record in the last 9 years on clay.
The Italian’s best result of the year was reaching the final in the Rome 1 Challenger.
Franco has a compiled 17-18 win-loss record in 2022, 10-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Verona Challenger
Filip Horansky
16 - 19win/loss
346
161
LWLWLLLLWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 19-30 | 3-3 | 8-15 | 8-10 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 27-29 | 1-2 | 20-18 | 6-8 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 16-17 | 1-2 | 15-13 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 34-33 | 1-3 | 24-16 | 9-10 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| 2018 | 48-27 | 0-0 | 38-19 | 8-6 | 2-1 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 199, the Slovakian got to the 2nd round after beating Andrea Vavassori 2-6 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round against Vavassori, Horansky recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 6-4 6-4). During the match Horansky scored 87 points vs Vavassori’s 83. The Slovakian was quite aggressive to blast 33 winners.
About the serving games, Horansky recorded 6 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Filip Horansky lost the serve 5 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Horansky put 64% of his first serves in, winning 67% (33/49) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (12/27) on the 2nd serve. Horansky broke Vavassori 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
Horansky’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in the Biel Challenger and the Prostejov Challenger.
Filip has a composed 15-19 win-loss record in 2022, 6-9 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Verona Challenger
The Slovakian has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Agamenone | Horansky |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 28 |
| Pts | 62-51 | 87-83 |
| Total Points | 113 | 170 |
| Winners | 30 | 33 |
| %Winners | 48% | 38% |
Both Agamenone and Horansky played 1 match. At the moment, Filip Horansky surrendered 1 set while Franco Agamenone hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Agamenone has played 1 set(s) less than Horansky (2 vs 3). Therefore, Agamenone played 9 games less than Horansky. The Italian scored 30 winners (48% of the total points). On the other side, The Slovakian recorded 33 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Agamenone | Horansky |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 6 |
| 1st in | 42/59 | 49/76 |
| %1st in | 71% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 30/42 | 33/49 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 67% |
| 2nd pts | 7/17 | 12/27 |
| %2nd pts | 41% | 44% |
Agamenone didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Horansky struck 6 aces . Agamenone won 71% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 41% of the points. On the other side, Horansky won 67% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 44% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Agamenone | Horansky |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 5 |
| Converted | 4/4 | 5/9 |
| % Converted | 100% | 56% |
| Conceded | 3 | 8 |
| Saved | 1 | 3 |
| % Saved | 33% | 38% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 5 |
Franco broke his opponent 4 times with a 100% conversion rate. Agamenone conceded his serve twice and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded. Filip broke his opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. Filip conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 38% of the break points that he conceded.
| Agamenone | |||
| R1 Caruso |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 62-51 | 62-51 | |
| Total points | 113 | 113 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 42/59 | 42/59 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 30/42 | 30/42 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/17 | 7/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 41% | 41% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/4 | 4/4 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Horansky | |||
| R1 Vavassori |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 2-6 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
| pts | 87-83 | 87-83 | |
| Total points | 170 | 170 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 49/76 | 49/76 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 33/49 | 33/49 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/27 | 12/27 | |
| % 2nd pts | 44% | 44% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 3/8 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 38% | 38% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLWLLWLW
Tennis Scores in Verona Challenger
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Pedro Boscardin DiasBoscardin Dias (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Norbert GombosGombos – Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri (7-69 6-4) – See score progression
- Riccardo BonadioBonadio – Gianluca MagerMager (6-4 3-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Raul BrancaccioBrancaccio – Dmitry PopkoPopko (6-1 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Filip HoranskyHoransky – Andrea VavassoriVavassori (2-6 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Jerome KymKym – Bernard TomicTomic (6-4 7-61) – See score progression
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Andrea ArnaboldiArnaboldi (6-4 1-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli – Gilles SimonSimon (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Pedro CachinCachin – Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Alexandre MullerMuller – Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna (6-1 4-2 ret.) – See score progression
- Mattia BellucciBellucci – Federico GaioGaio (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Matteo GiganteGigante – Luca NardiNardi (6-4 3-6 7-60) – See score progression
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe – Nikola MilojevicMilojevic (6-0 6-4) – See score progression
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Salvatore CarusoCaruso (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Pedro CachinCachin – Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe – Sebastian OfnerOfner (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Filip HoranskyHoransky (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro CachinCachin – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Raul BrancaccioBrancaccio – Marco CecchinatoCecchinato (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli – Riccardo BonadioBonadio (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino (1-1) – H2H and prediction
