Erika Andreeva and Magali Kempen will face off in the qualifications of the Ladies Open Lausanne for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 3:00 pm on Court 2. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Erika Andreeva who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Erika Andreeva is the pick to win this match.
Erika Andreeva -> 1.31
Magali Kempen -> 3.45
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Erika Andreeva vs. Magali Kempen
There is no head to head record between Erika Andreeva and Magali Kempen since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Erika Andreeva
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 17-10 | 11-7 | 1-1 | 5-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 41-30 | 11-10 | 11-13 | 18-6 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 44-23 | 9-4 | 26-13 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 5-1 |
| 2021 | 39-15 | 11-2 | 16-8 | 12-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 18-2 | 0-0 | 18-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 162 (career-high), the Russian reached the qualifications after defeating Ekaterina Makarova (1996) 6-3 6-3.
In the qualifications, The Russian had a good straight sets win against Makarova (1996) (6-3 6-3). During the match, Andreeva scored 76 points vs Makarova (1996)’s 58. The Russian was pretty aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Talking about the service games, Andreeva scored just 1 ace for the entire match and she committed only 1 double fault. Erika Andreeva lost the serve twice and she saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Andreeva put 66% of her first serves in, winning 58% (22/38) of the points behind her 1st serve and 70% (14/20) on the 2nd serve. Andreeva broke Makarova (1996) 5 times after converting 36% of her break points (5/14).
Andreeva has a fantastic match record in the last 4 years having won 74% of her matches (86-30). 19-8 on clay in 2022. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this competition, Andreeva has a compiled53-18 record in the last 4 years on clay.
Erika’s best result of the season was getting to the final in the W100+H La Bisbal D’Emporda.
The Russian has an overall 28-11 win-loss record in 2022, 19-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Lausanne
Andreeva has never competed in this tournament before.
Magali Kempen
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 14-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 8-1 | 0-0 | 6-3 |
| 2023 | 18-24 | 2-7 | 3-5 | 10-7 | 2-4 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 43-23 | 8-3 | 15-11 | 20-8 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 23-14 | 18-6 | 5-6 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 11-9 | 11-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 358, the Belgian got to the qualifications after beating Yana Morderger 6-2 1-6 6-4.
In the qualifications, Magali defeated Morderger (6-2 1-6 6-4). During the match Kempen scored 96 points vs Morderger’s 95. Magali was pretty aggressive to blast 42 winners.
Talking about serving, Kempen was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and she was not very solid on her 2nd serve to score 13 double faults. Magali Kempen lost the serve 4 times and she saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Kempen put 67% of her first serves in, winning 68% (42/62) of the points behind her 1st serve and 27% (8/30) on the 2nd serve. Kempen broke Morderger 5 times after converting 50% of her break points (5/10).
Kempen has an aggregate 21-11 win-loss record in 2022, 8-7 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Andreeva | Kempen |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 25 |
| Pts | 76-58 | 96-95 |
| Total Points | 134 | 191 |
| Winners | 22 | 42 |
| %Winners | 29% | 44% |
Both Andreeva and Kempen played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Magali Kempen dropped 1 set while Erika Andreeva hasn’t conceded a set so far. Andreeva has played 1 set(s) less than Kempen (2 vs 3). Therefore, Andreeva played 7 games less than Kempen. Erika scored 22 winners (29% of the total points). On the other side, The Belgian blasted 42 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Andreeva | Kempen |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 0 |
| 1st in | 38/58 | 62/92 |
| %1st in | 66% | 67% |
| 1st pts | 22/38 | 42/62 |
| %1st pts | 58% | 68% |
| 2nd pts | 14/20 | 8/30 |
| %2nd pts | 70% | 27% |
Andreeva blasted 1 ace . Kempen didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Andreeva won 58% points on her first serve. She extremely effective on her second serve to win 70% of the points. On the other side, Kempen won 68% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 27% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Andreeva | Kempen |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 5 |
| Converted | 5/14 | 5/10 |
| % Converted | 36% | 50% |
| Conceded | 5 | 10 |
| Saved | 3 | 6 |
| % Saved | 60% | 60% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 4 |
The Russian broke her opponent 5 times with a 36% conversion rate. The Russian conceded her serve twice and she saved 60% of the break points that she conceded. Magali broke her opponent 5 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Belgian conceded her serve 4 times and she saved 60% of the break points that she conceded.
| Andreeva | |||
| Q1 Makarova |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 76-58 | 76-58 | |
| Total points | 134 | 134 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 29% | 29% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 38/58 | 38/58 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 22/38 | 22/38 | |
| % 1st pts | 58% | 58% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/20 | 14/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 70% | 70% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/14 | 5/14 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Kempen | |||
| Q1 Morderger |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 1-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 25 | |
| pts | 96-95 | 96-95 | |
| Total points | 191 | 191 | |
| Winners | 42 | 42 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 13 | 13 | |
| 1st in | 62/92 | 62/92 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 42/62 | 42/62 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/30 | 8/30 | |
| % 2nd pts | 27% | 27% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/10 | 5/10 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
| Saved | 6/10 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLWWWWLW
LWWLWWLWWW Tennis Scores in Lausanne
- Liam CaruanaCaruana – Robert GallowayGalloway (6-0 7-63) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Lukas KleinKlein – Marko OsmakcicOsmakcic (7-64 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Benjamin SigouinSigouin – Fabien SalleSalle (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Katie VolynetsVolynets – Eva LysLys (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Olga DanilovicDanilovic – Anastasia ZakharovaZakharova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anna BlinkovaBlinkova – Ipek OzOz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cristina BucsaBucsa – Alexandra CadantuCadantu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Leolia JeanjeanJeanjean – Yuki NaitoNaito (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Magali KempenKempen – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Danielle Rose CollinsRose Collins – Simona WaltertWaltert (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anna KalinskayaKalinskaya – Tamara ZidansekZidansek (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Irina-Camelia BeguBegu – Tamara KorpatschKorpatsch (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lucia BronzettiBronzetti – Anastasia PotapovaPotapova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ylena In-AlbonIn-Albon – Jule NiemeierNiemeier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Caroline GarciaGarcia – Jasmine PaoliniPaolini (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lin ZhuZhu – Clara BurelBurel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lauren DavisDavis – Sara Sorribes TormoSorribes Tormo (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nuria Parrizas-DiazParrizas-Diaz – Petra MarticMartic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oceane DodinDodin – Susan BandecchiBandecchi (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Diane ParryParry – Belinda BencicBencic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
