Raul Brancaccio and Samuel Vincent Ruggeri will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Verona Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 11:00 am on GRAND STAND. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Raul Brancaccio who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Raul Brancaccio is the pick to win this match.
Raul Brancaccio -> 1.35
Samuel Vincent Ruggeri -> 3.1
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Raul Brancaccio vs. Samuel Vincent Ruggeri
There is no head to head record between Raul Brancaccio and Samuel Vincent Ruggeri since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Raul Brancaccio
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24-26 | 6-6 | 18-18 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 28-32 | 14-7 | 11-19 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 39-26 | 7-6 | 31-18 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 47-26 | 2-1 | 43-21 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 11-12 | 1-1 | 3-4 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 323, Raul got to the qualifications after beating Davide Galoppini 6-1 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Italian had a good straight sets win against Galoppini (6-1 6-4). During the match, Brancaccio scored 57 points vs Galoppini’s 37. The Italian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Talking about the service games, Brancaccio scored just 1 ace during the encounter and he committed only 3 double faults. Raul Brancaccio lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Brancaccio put 59% of his first serves in, winning 75% (24/32) of the points behind his 1st serve and 41% (9/22) on the 2nd serve. Raul broke Galoppini 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
Brancaccio has a winning record in the last 7 years having won 59% of his matches (248-170). 17-12 on clay in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Brancaccio has a composed201-129 win-loss record in the last 7 years on clay.
Raul’s best result of the current year was getting to the semifinal in M25 Mataro and the Troyes Challenger.
Raul has a compiled 20-15 win-loss record in 2022, 17-12 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Verona Challenger
Raul has never competed in this tournament before.
Samuel Vincent Ruggeri
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 45-30 | 10-5 | 26-20 | 9-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 47-29 | 25-11 | 22-14 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 55-28 | 29-10 | 26-18 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 37-24 | 18-13 | 15-9 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 394 (career-high), Samuel reached the qualifications after beating Luca Potenza 6-1 6-0.
In the qualifications, Vincent had a good straight sets win against Potenza (6-1 6-0). During the match Vincent scored 58 points vs Potenza’s 30. Vincent was pretty aggressive to blast 21 winners.
About the serving games, Vincent recorded 11 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Samuel Vincent Ruggeri conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 65% of his first serves in, win 68% (21/31) of the points behind his 1st serve and 71% (12/17) on the 2nd serve. The Italian broke Potenza 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Vincent’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M15 Sharm ElSheikh,M15 Ulcinj and M25 Ulcinj.
Samuel has a compiled 40-18 win-loss record in 2022, 20-10 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Brancaccio | Vincent |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 13 |
| Pts | 57-37 | 58-30 |
| Total Points | 94 | 88 |
| Winners | 24 | 21 |
| %Winners | 42% | 36% |
Both Brancaccio and Vincent played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Brancaccio and Vincent have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Brancaccio played 4 games more than Vincent. The Italian scored 24 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, The Italian made 21 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Brancaccio | Vincent |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 11 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 11 |
| 1st in | 32/54 | 31/48 |
| %1st in | 59% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 24/32 | 21/31 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 68% |
| 2nd pts | 9/22 | 12/17 |
| %2nd pts | 41% | 71% |
Brancaccio managed to score 1 ace . Vincent also fired 11 aces . Brancaccio won 75% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 41% of the points. On the other side, Vincent won 68% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 71% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Brancaccio | Vincent |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 5 |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/8 |
| % Converted | 71% | 63% |
| Conceded | 6 | 0 |
| Saved | 4 | 0 |
| % Saved | 67% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 |
The Italian broke his opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. Brancaccio surrendered his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Samuel broke his opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. The Italian was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Brancaccio | |||
| Q1 Galoppini |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 57-37 | 57-37 | |
| Total points | 94 | 94 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 32/54 | 32/54 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 24/32 | 24/32 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/22 | 9/22 | |
| % 2nd pts | 41% | 41% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Vincent | |||
| Q1 Potenza |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 13 | 13 | |
| pts | 58-30 | 58-30 | |
| Total points | 88 | 88 | |
| Winners | 21 | 21 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 11 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 31/48 | 31/48 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 21/31 | 21/31 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/17 | 12/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 71% | 71% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLLWWWLW
LWLWWLLLWL
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi – Sebastian OfnerOfner (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Salvatore CarusoCaruso (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Riccardo BonadioBonadio – Gianluca MagerMager (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Alexey VatutinVatutin – Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nikola MilojevicMilojevic – Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro CachinCachin – Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea VavassoriVavassori – Filip HoranskyHoransky (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Raul BrancaccioBrancaccio – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Remy BertolaBertola – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna – Alexandre MullerMuller (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante – Marco CecchinatoCecchinato (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri – Norbert GombosGombos (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Andrea ArnaboldiArnaboldi (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro Boscardin DiasBoscardin Dias – Khumoun SultanovSultanov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
