Mathieu Perchicot and Nick Chappell will square off in the qualifications of the Cali Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 10:00 am on CANCHA 4. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Mathieu Perchicot who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Mathieu Perchicot is the pick to win this match.
Mathieu Perchicot -> 1.58
Nick Chappell -> 2.32
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Mathieu Perchicot vs. Nick Chappell
There is no head to head record between Mathieu Perchicot and Nick Chappell since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Mathieu Perchicot
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 22-28 | 0-0 | 22-26 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 28-32 | 1-2 | 27-29 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 21-16 | 5-4 | 16-11 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 46-26 | 0-0 | 46-26 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2018 | 51-22 | 5-2 | 45-19 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 449, Mathieu reached the qualifications after beating Alejandro Mendoza 6-4 1-6 6-3.
In the qualifications, Perchicot defeated Mendoza (6-4 1-6 6-3).During the match, Perchicot scored less points (6) than Mendoza. In fact, the world no. 449 won 85 points vs Mendoza’s. That means that Perchicot was more focused during the important points. The French player was exceptionally aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Regarding the service games, Perchicot made 5 aces and he committed only 8 double faults. Mathieu Perchicot lost the serve 3 times and he saved 10 break points. Furthermore, Perchicot put 53% of his first serves in, winning 75% (36/48) of the points behind his 1st serve and 36% (15/42) on the 2nd serve. Perchicot broke Mendoza 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Perchicot has a solid win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 61% of his matches (184-120). 19-15 on clay in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Perchicot has a compiled172-108 match record in the last 7 years on clay.
Mathieu’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in M15+H Bagnoles de l’Orne.
Mathieu has an overall 19-16 win-loss record in 2022, 19-15 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Cali Challenger
The French player has never competed in this tournament before.
Nick Chappell
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24-26 | 19-18 | 1-4 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 44-36 | 38-25 | 2-4 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 23-33 | 14-16 | 7-8 | 2-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 21-35 | 14-16 | 4-12 | 3-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 22-16 | 19-11 | 0-0 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 467, the American reached the qualifications after defeating Victor Lilov 2-6 6-1 6-3.
In the qualifications against Lilov, The American recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 6-1 6-3). During the match Chappell scored 83 points vs Lilov’s 69. Chappell was pretty aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about serving, Chappell fired 4 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Nick Chappell lost the serve 4 times and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Chappell put 57% of his first serves in, winning 65% (28/43) of the points behind his 1st serve and 55% (18/33) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Lilov 6 times after converting 86% of his break points (6/7).
Chappell’s best result of the current year was getting to the semifinal in M25 Cancun.
Nick has an aggregate 11-16 win-loss record in 2022, 4-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Perchicot | Chappell |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 26 | 24 |
| Pts | 85-91 | 83-69 |
| Total Points | 176 | 152 |
| Winners | 36 | 28 |
| %Winners | 42% | 34% |
Both Perchicot and Chappell played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Mathieu Perchicot surrendered 1 set, while Nick Chappell dropped 1 set. Talking about their workload, Perchicot and Chappell have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Perchicot played 2 games more than Chappell. The French player scored 36 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, The American scored 28 winners (34%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Perchicot | Chappell |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 4 |
| 1st in | 48/90 | 43/76 |
| %1st in | 53% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 36/48 | 28/43 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 65% |
| 2nd pts | 15/42 | 18/33 |
| %2nd pts | 36% | 55% |
Perchicot managed to score 5 aces . Chappell managed to score 4 aces . Perchicot won 75% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 36% of the points. On the other side, Chappell won 65% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Perchicot | Chappell |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 6 |
| Converted | 3/7 | 6/7 |
| % Converted | 43% | 86% |
| Conceded | 13 | 11 |
| Saved | 10 | 7 |
| % Saved | 77% | 64% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 4 |
Mathieu broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. Perchicot dropped his serve 3 times and he saved 77% of the break points that he conceded. Chappell broke his opponent 6 times with a 86% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 64% of the break points that he conceded.
| Perchicot | |||
| Q1 Mendoza |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 1-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
| pts | 85-91 | 85-91 | |
| Total points | 176 | 176 | |
| Winners | 36 | 36 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 8 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 48/90 | 48/90 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 36/48 | 36/48 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/42 | 15/42 | |
| % 2nd pts | 36% | 36% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 13 | 13 | |
| Saved | 10/13 | 10 | |
| Saved % | 77% | 77% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Chappell | |||
| Q1 Lilov |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 2-6 6-1 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 24 | 24 | |
| pts | 83-69 | 83-69 | |
| Total points | 152 | 152 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 43/76 | 43/76 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 28/43 | 28/43 | |
| % 1st pts | 65% | 65% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/33 | 18/33 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/7 | 6/7 | |
| Converted % | 86% | 86% | |
| Conceded | 11 | 11 | |
| Saved | 7/11 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 64% | 64% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLLWWWW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Malek JaziriJaziri – Felipe Meligeni Rodrigues AlvesMeligeni Rodrigues Alves (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gerald MelzerMelzer – Mateo GomezGomez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Joao MenezesMenezes – Gonzalo LamaLama (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas AlvarezAlvarez – Adrian Menendez-MaceirasMenendez-Maceiras (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Goncalo OliveiraOliveira – Facundo MenaMena (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yunseong ChungChung – Ignacio MonzonMonzon (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Matias ZukasZukas – Joao Victor Couto LoureiroVictor Couto Loureiro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Andres UrreaUrrea (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera – Michail PervolarakisPervolarakis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mathieu PerchicotPerchicot – Nick ChappellChappell (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan ZhuZhu – Nicolas MejiaMejia (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nick HardtHardt – Facundo JuarezJuarez (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – Miljan ZekicZekic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mateus De Carvalho CardosoDe Carvalho Cardoso – Fernando YamacitaYamacita (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francisco ComesanaComesana – Roberto QuirozQuiroz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
