Fernanda Contreras Gomez and Jamie Loeb will play each other in the qualifications of Wimbledon for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 1:00 pm on Court 2. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Fernanda Contreras Gomez who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Fernanda Contreras Gomez is the pick to win this match.
Fernanda Contreras Gomez -> 1.42
Jamie Loeb -> 2.875
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Fernanda Contreras Gomez vs. Jamie Loeb
This will be the 3rd time that Fernanda Contreras Gomez and Jamie Loeb clash against each other. The head to head is 1-1 for Contreras Gomez and Loeb (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on grass.
The last time that they fought against each other, Contreras Gomez won 6-3 6-3 in the 2nd round in the W60+H Bendigo back in January 2022.
Fernanda Contreras Gomez
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 3-7 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 20-26 | 5-12 | 9-11 | 6-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 36-23 | 20-14 | 12-6 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
2021 | 26-18 | 10-7 | 16-10 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 4-7 | 1-5 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 157 (career-high), the Mexican got to the qualifications after defeating Tena Lukas 6-4 7-63.
In the qualifications, The Mexican had a good straight sets win against Lukas (6-4 7-63). During the match, Contreras Gomez scored 78 points vs Lukas’s 68. The Mexican was quite aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Regarding the service games, Contreras Gomez bagged 3 aces and she was exceptionally steady in conceding no double faults. Overall, Fernanda Contreras Gomez was exceptionally effective on serve to win 73% (24/33) of her 1st serve and 59% (24/41) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent her to concede the serve 3 times. Fernanda broke Lukas 4 times after converting 57% of her break points (4/7).
Contreras Gomez has a solid match record in the last 4 years having won 63% of her matches (84-49). 2-2 on grass in 2022. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Contreras Gomez has an overall2-2 record in the last 4 years on grass.
Contreras Gomez’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in the W60 Canberra and the W60 Prague.
Fernanda has a composed 24-14 win-loss record in 2022, 2-2 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Wimbledon
The Mexican has never competed in this tournament before.
Jamie Loeb
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 19-29 | 11-11 | 6-7 | 2-10 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 27-30 | 11-14 | 8-12 | 8-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 27-26 | 16-13 | 2-7 | 6-3 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
2021 | 21-20 | 6-6 | 15-11 | 0-1 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
2020 | 15-16 | 9-8 | 1-6 | 5-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 216, Loeb reached the qualifications after defeating Talia Neilson Gatenby 6-2 6-2.
In the qualifications, The American had a good straight sets win against Neilson Gatenby (6-2 6-2). During the match Loeb and Neilson Gatenby scored the same amount of points (). However, the world no. 157 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. Loeb was not very aggressive do strike just winners.
Talking about serving, Loeb couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and she was quite solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Jamie Loeb conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 0% of her first serves in, win 0% (/) of the points behind her 1st serve and 0% (/) on the 2nd serve.
Jamie has a composed 9-13 win-loss record in 2022, 3-2 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Wimbledon
Previously, her best result was reaching the qualifications in 2018. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Contreras Gomez | Loeb |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 23 | 16 |
Pts | 78-68 | 0-0 |
Total Points | 146 | 0 |
Winners | 24 | 0 |
%Winners | 31% | 0% |
Both Contreras Gomez and Loeb played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Contreras Gomez and Loeb have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Contreras Gomez played 7 games more than Loeb. Contreras Gomez scored 24 winners (31% of the total points). On the other side, The American struck 0 winners (0%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Contreras Gomez | Loeb |
---|---|---|
Aces | 3 | 0 |
Avg per match | 3 | 0 |
1st in | 33/74 | 0/0 |
%1st in | 45% | 0% |
1st pts | 24/33 | 0/0 |
%1st pts | 73% | 0% |
2nd pts | 24/41 | 0/0 |
%2nd pts | 59% | 0% |
Contreras Gomez fired 3 aces . Loeb didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Contreras Gomez won 73% points on her first serve. She quite strong on her second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Loeb won 0% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 0% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Contreras Gomez | Loeb |
---|---|---|
Won | 4 | 0 |
Converted | 4/7 | 0/0 |
% Converted | 57% | 0% |
Conceded | 9 | 0 |
Saved | 6 | 0 |
% Saved | 67% | 0% |
Times Broken | 3 | 0 |
Contreras Gomez broke her opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. The Mexican dropped her serve 3 times and she saved 67% of the break points that she conceded. On the other side, Jamie hasn’t manged yet to break her opponent. She didn’t manage to even clinch a single break point. Loeb was rock solid on her serve as she has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points without even conceding a single break point.
Contreras Gomez | |||
Q1 Lukas |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 7-63 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
pts | 78-68 | 78-68 | |
Total points | 146 | 146 | |
Winners | 24 | 24 | |
%Winners | 31% | 31% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 3 | 3 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
1st in | 33/74 | 33/74 | |
% 1st in | 45% | 45% | |
1st pts | 24/33 | 24/33 | |
% 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
2nd pts | 24/41 | 24/41 | |
% 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
Saved | 6/9 | 6 | |
Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
Loeb | |||
Q1 Neilson |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
pts | – | 0-0 | |
Total points | 0 | 0 | |
Winners | 0 | ||
%Winners | 0% | 0% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 0 | 0 | |
Double Faults | 0 | ||
1st in | / | 0/0 | |
% 1st in | 0% | 0% | |
1st pts | / | 0/0 | |
% 1st pts | 0% | 0% | |
2nd pts | / | 0/0 | |
% 2nd pts | 0% | 0% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 0 | ||
Converted | / | 0/0 | |
Converted % | 0% | 0% | |
Conceded | 0 | ||
Saved | 0/ | 0 | |
Saved % | – | 0% | |
Times Broken | 0 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores – Wimbledon
- Leolia JeanjeanJeanjean – Gabriela CeCe (6-2 0-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Arianne HartonoHartono – Carole MonnetMonnet (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Maddison InglisInglis – Indy De VroomeDe Vroome (7-68 6-1) – See score progression
- Jana FettFett – Paula OrmaecheaOrmaechea (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Nigina AbduraimovaAbduraimova – Ipek OzOz (0-6 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Nastasja Mariana SchunkMariana Schunk – Miriam KolodziejovaKolodziejova (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Danielle LaoLao – Carolina Meligeni AlvesMeligeni Alves (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Viktoria KuzmovaKuzmova – Elvina KalievaKalieva (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Despina PapamichailPapamichail – Eva LysLys (3-6 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Maja ChwalinskaChwalinska – Aliona BolsovaBolsova (6-2 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Mai HontamaHontama – Stephanie WagnerWagner (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Hanna ChangChang – Mingge XuXu (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Sarah Beth GreyBeth Grey – Olivia GadeckiGadecki (5-7 7-5 7-67) – See score progression
- Maria Lourdes CarleLourdes Carle – Kateryna BaindlBaindl (3-6 6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Robin AndersonAnderson – Ellen PerezPerez (3-6 7-65 6-2) – See score progression
- Lizette CabreraCabrera – Elsa JacquemotJacquemot (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Irene Burillo EscorihuelaBurillo Escorihuela – Stefanie VoegeleVoegele (6-4 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Yanina WickmayerWickmayer – Julia GrabherGrabher (6-4 7-64) – See score progression
- Cristiana FerrandoFerrando – Antonia LottnerLottner (4-6 6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Louisa ChiricoChirico – Anna SiskovaSiskova (1-6 6-1 6-0) – See score progression
- Sachia VickeryVickery – Justina MikulskyteMikulskyte (1-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Katarzyna KawaKawa – Susan BandecchiBandecchi (6-2 3-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Timea BabosBabos – Katharina GerlachGerlach (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- En Shuo LiangShuo Liang – Emiliana ArangoArango (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Jaimee FourlisFourlis – Dea HerdzelasHerdzelas (5-7 7-64 6-4) – See score progression
- Zoe HivesHives – Gabriela LeeLee (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Isabella ShinikovaShinikova – Simona WaltertWaltert (6-3 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Tessah AndrianjafitrimoAndrianjafitrimo – Linda FruhvirtovaFruhvirtova (2-6 6-4 7-66) – See score progression
- Cristina BucsaBucsa – Jesika MaleckovaMaleckova (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Emina BektasBektas – Sara BejlekBejlek (7-63 6-3) – See score progression
- Sophie ChangChang – Raluca Georgiana SerbanGeorgiana Serban (6-4 7-64) – See score progression
- Alexandra CadantuCadantu – Cristina DinuDinu (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Mirjam BjorklundBjorklund – Sara ErraniErrani (6-4 6-77 7-66) – See score progression
- Priscilla HonHon – Valentini GrammatikopoulouGrammatikopoulou (2-6 6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Jessika PonchetPonchet – Tereza SmitkovaSmitkova (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Su Jeong JangJeong Jang – Veronica Cepede RoygCepede Royg (7-64 6-1) – See score progression
- Jamie LoebLoeb – Talia Neilson GatenbyNeilson Gatenby (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Lesley Pattinama KerkhovePattinama Kerkhove – Lea BoskovicBoskovic (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Astra SharmaSharma – Joanne ZugerZuger (7-66 6-4) – See score progression
- Katarina ZavatskaZavatska – Ranah Akua StoiberAkua Stoiber (6-3 6-75 7-5) – See score progression
- Jessica PieriPieri – Giulia Gatto-MonticoneGatto-Monticone (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Mandy MinellaMinella – Na-Lae HanHan (6-2 0-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Andrea Lazaro GarciaLazaro Garcia – Yuki NaitoNaito (6-1 1-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Reka-Luca JaniJani – Anastasia KulikovaKulikova (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Ysaline BonaventureBonaventure – Francesca Di LorenzoDi Lorenzo (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Yue YuanYuan – Marcela ZacariasZacarias (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Rebecca SramkovaSramkova – Ulrikke EikeriEikeri (6-3 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Katie VolynetsVolynets – Anna-Lena FriedsamFriedsam (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Coco VandewegheVandeweghe – Ella McdonaldMcdonald (5-7 6-1 7-68) – See score progression
- Victoria Jimenez KasintsevaJimenez Kasintseva – Barbara HaasHaas (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Christina MchaleMchale – Laura-Ioana PaarPaar (2-6 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Fiona FerroFerro – Moyuka UchijimaUchijima (7-5 6-75 7-5) – See score progression
- Lucrezia StefaniniStefanini – Grace MinMin (4-6 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Catherine HarrisonHarrison – Eden SilvaSilva (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Kathinka Von DeichmannVon Deichmann – Maia LumsdenLumsden (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Mariam BolkvadzeBolkvadze – Alycia ParksParks (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Daniela VismaneVismane – Ivonne Cavalle-ReimersCavalle-Reimers (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Nadia PodoroskaPodoroska – Asia MuhammadMuhammad (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Daria SnigurSnigur – Suzan LamensLamens (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Lulu SunSun – Federica Di SarraDi Sarra (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Conny PerrinPerrin – Kaylah McpheeMcphee (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Natalija StevanovicStevanovic – Seone MendezMendez (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Fernanda Contreras GomezContreras Gomez – Tena LukasLukas (6-4 7-63) – See score progression
- Storm SandersSanders – Anna BroganBrogan (7-62 6-4) – See score progression
- Yen-Hsun LuLu – Rigele TeTe (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Alexandr DolgopolovDolgopolov – Nicolas JarryJarry (7-61 6-3) – See score progression
- Vasek PospisilPospisil – Taylor Harry FritzHarry Fritz (6-3 7-65) – See score progression
- Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen – Borna CoricCoric (7-68 6-4) – See score progression
- Donald YoungYoung – Peter PolanskyPolansky (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili – Fajing SunSun (6-3 7-63) – See score progression
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Yan BaiBai (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Malek JaziriJaziri – Mikhail YouzhnyYouzhny (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Stefanos TsitsipasTsitsipas – Peter GojowczykGojowczyk (6-3 7-64) – See score progression
- Jeremy ChardyChardy – Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro (6-711 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Radu AlbotAlbot – Florian MayerMayer (6-1 7-64) – See score progression
- Leonardo MayerMayer – Sergiy StakhovskyStakhovsky (7-62 3-6 7-65) – See score progression
- Frances TiafoeTiafoe – Zhizhen ZhangZhang (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Dusan LajovicLajovic – Taro DanielDaniel (6-1 6-75 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Katie VolynetsVolynets – Priscilla HonHon (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sachia VickeryVickery – Zoe HivesHives (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Coco VandewegheVandeweghe – Daniela VismaneVismane (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maja ChwalinskaChwalinska – Alexandra CadantuCadantu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mirjam BjorklundBjorklund – Storm SandersSanders (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- En Shuo LiangShuo Liang – Maria Lourdes CarleLourdes Carle (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cristina BucsaBucsa – Danielle LaoLao (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jessica PieriPieri – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maddison InglisInglis – Mandy MinellaMinella (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Natalija KosticKostic – Despina PapamichailPapamichail (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katarzyna KawaKawa – Sophie ChangChang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lucrezia StefaniniStefanini – Leolia JeanjeanJeanjean (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daria SnigurSnigur – Timea BabosBabos (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jamie LoebLoeb – Fernanda Contreras GomezContreras Gomez (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Reka-Luca JaniJani – Louisa ChiricoChirico (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kathinka Von DeichmannVon Deichmann – Nigina AbduraimovaAbduraimova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mai HontamaHontama – Lizette CabreraCabrera (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lulu SunSun – Sarah Beth GreyBeth Grey (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Astra SharmaSharma – Irene Burillo EscorihuelaBurillo Escorihuela (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Conny PerrinPerrin – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Robin AndersonAnderson – Katarina ZavatskaZavatska (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mariam BolkvadzeBolkvadze – Jana FettFett (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tessah AndrianjafitrimoAndrianjafitrimo – Jessika PonchetPonchet (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jaimee FourlisFourlis – Nadia PodoroskaPodoroska (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yanina WickmayerWickmayer – Isabella ShinikovaShinikova (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rebecca SramkovaSramkova – Su Jeong JangJeong Jang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lesley KerkhoveKerkhove – Andrea Lazaro GarciaLazaro Garcia (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christina MchaleMchale – Viktoria KuzmovaKuzmova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yue YuanYuan – Cristiana FerrandoFerrando (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Catherine HarrisonHarrison – Ysaline BonaventureBonaventure (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Fiona FerroFerro – Hanna ChangChang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emina BektasBektas – Arianne HartonoHartono (0-1) – H2H and prediction