Jack Sock and Daniel Masur will face off in the 2nd round of the Ilkley Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 11:00 am on COURT 2. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jack Sock who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jack Sock is the pick to win this match.
Jack Sock -> 1.34
Daniel Masur -> 3.26
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jack Sock vs. Daniel Masur
This will be the 2nd time that Jack Sock and Daniel Masur fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Masur (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on grass.
The last time that they played, Masur won 7-6(6) 6-4 in the qualifications in at the French Open back in May 2022.
Jack Sock
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2-6 | 1-2 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 33-21 | 5-8 | 8-4 | 7-5 | 13-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 22-16 | 12-8 | 0-1 | 8-6 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 12-6 | 8-4 | 4-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 1-8 | 0-7 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 129, Jack reached the 2nd round after beating Michael Mmoh 6-3 6-3.
In the 1st round, Jack had a good straight sets win against Mmoh (6-3 6-3). During the match, Sock scored 67 points vs Mmoh’s 50. Jack was pretty aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about the service games, Sock bagged 4 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Jack Sock was pretty effective on serve to win 84% (31/37) of his 1st serve and 57% (8/14) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Sock broke Mmoh 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
Sock has a winning win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 58% of his matches (241-178). 4-1 on grass in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Sock has a compiled 18-15 win-loss record in the last years on grass.
Jack’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in the Savannah Challenger.
Jack has an overall 20-10 win-loss record in 2022, 4-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Ilkley Challenger
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
Daniel Masur
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 41-21 | 1-2 | 11-10 | 16-6 | 1-2 | 12-1 |
| 2023 | 34-24 | 7-8 | 9-7 | 9-5 | 0-1 | 9-3 |
| 2022 | 25-28 | 7-8 | 5-6 | 4-9 | 5-3 | 4-2 |
| 2021 | 28-26 | 4-4 | 1-7 | 15-12 | 3-2 | 5-1 |
| 2020 | 15-14 | 3-2 | 2-5 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 4-2 |
Ranked no. 233, Masur reached the 2nd round after defeating Luca Pow 6-2 6-1, Borna Gojo 6-76 7-65 7-61 and Ernesto Escobedo 6-710 6-3 6-3.
In the 1st round against Escobedo, The German recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-710 6-3 6-3). During the match Masur scored 105 points vs Escobedo’s 87. Daniel was extremely aggressive to blast 50 winners.
Talking about serving, Masur struck 11 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Daniel Masur was pretty effective on serve to win 72% (50/69) of his 1st serve and 57% (12/21) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The German broke Escobedo 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
Masur’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in M25 Trimbach.
Daniel has an aggregate 12-14 win-loss record in 2022, 3-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Sock | Masur |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 85 |
| Pts | 67-50 | 298-252 |
| Total Points | 117 | 550 |
| Winners | 31 | 140 |
| %Winners | 46% | 47% |
Sock played 1 match while Masur competed in 3 matches. Masur started his run from the qualifications while Sock had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Daniel Masur conceded 2 sets while Jack Sock hasn’t dropped a set so far. Sock has played 6 set(s) less than Masur (2 vs 8). Therefore, Sock played 67 games less than Masur. The American scored 31 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, The German recorded 140 winners (47%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Sock | Masur |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 24 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 8 |
| 1st in | 37/51 | 185/262 |
| %1st in | 73% | 71% |
| 1st pts | 31/37 | 140/185 |
| %1st pts | 84% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 8/14 | 39/77 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 51% |
Sock scored 4 aces . Masur made 24 aces (8 per match). Sock won 84% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Masur won 76% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 51% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Sock | Masur |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 11 |
| Converted | 3/9 | 11/24 |
| % Converted | 33% | 46% |
| Conceded | 0 | 16 |
| Saved | 0 | 12 |
| % Saved | 0% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 4 |
Jack broke his opponent 3 times with a 33% conversion rate. Jack pretty effective on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 0 break points. The German broke his opponents 11 times with a 46% conversion rate. The German conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| Sock | |||
| R1 Mmoh |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 67-50 | 67-50 | |
| Total points | 117 | 117 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 37/51 | 37/51 | |
| % 1st in | 73% | 73% | |
| 1st pts | 31/37 | 31/37 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/14 | 8/14 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/9 | 3/9 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Masur | |||||
| Q1 Pow |
Q3 Gojo |
R1 Escobedo |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | 6-76 7-65 7-61 | 6-710 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 39 | 31 | 85 | |
| pts | 60-36 | 133-129 | 105-87 | 298-252 | |
| Total points | 96 | 262 | 192 | 550 | |
| Winners | 26 | 64 | 50 | 140 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 48% | 48% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 4 | 9 | 11 | 24 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | 2 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 32/48 | 84/124 | 69/90 | 185/262 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 68% | 77% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 26/32 | 64/84 | 50/69 | 140/185 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 76% | 72% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/16 | 18/40 | 12/21 | 39/77 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 45% | 57% | 51% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 2 | 5 | 11 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 2/8 | 5/9 | 11/24 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 25% | 56% | 46% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 6 | 8 | 16 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 4/6 | 6/8 | 12 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 67% | 75% | 242% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLWLWWLL Tennis Scores in Ilkley Challenger
- Nuno BorgesBorges – Jordan ThompsonThompson (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Daniel CoxCox – Charles BroomBroom (7-61 7-61) – See score progression
- John MillmanMillman – Felix GillGill (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Vasek PospisilPospisil – Aidan MchughMchugh (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Jesper De JongDe Jong (7-68 6-3) – See score progression
- Gijs BrouwerBrouwer – Lucas PouillePouille (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Daniel MasurMasur – Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo (6-710 6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Alexei PopyrinPopyrin – Borna GojoGojo (7-65 7-66) – See score progression
- Zizou BergsBergs – Jurij RodionovRodionov (5-7 7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Hugo GrenierGrenier – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (7-63 7-5) – See score progression
- Andreas SeppiSeppi – Rinky HijikataHijikata (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Jack SockSock – Michael MmohMmoh (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert – Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Arthur FeryFery (4-6 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Fernando VerdascoVerdasco – Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin (6-0 0-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Jiri VeselyVesely – Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek (7-63 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Fernando VerdascoVerdasco – Constant LestienneLestienne (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Vasek PospisilPospisil – Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel CoxCox – Zizou BergsBergs (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- John MillmanMillman – Gijs BrouwerBrouwer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jack SockSock – Daniel MasurMasur (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Alexei PopyrinPopyrin (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo GrenierGrenier – Jiri VeselyVesely (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Nuno BorgesBorges – Andreas SeppiSeppi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
