Grigor Dimitrov and Botic Van De Zandschulp will square off in the 2nd round of the cinch Championships for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 2:30 pm on CENTRE COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Grigor Dimitrov who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Grigor Dimitrov is the pick to win this match.
Grigor Dimitrov -> 1.33
Botic Van De Zandschulp -> 3.44
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Grigor Dimitrov vs. Botic Van De Zandschulp
This will be the 2nd time that Grigor Dimitrov and Botic Van De Zandschulp clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Dimitrov (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on grass.
The last time that they fought against each other, Dimitrov won 6-7(5) 6-0 7-5 in the quarter in Melbourne back in January 2022.
Highlights Grigor Dimitrov vs Botic Van De Zandschulp – Melbourne 07-January-2022
Grigor Dimitrov
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 38-14 | 19-6 | 8-4 | 7-2 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 43-21 | 16-10 | 10-5 | 10-4 | 7-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-22 | 10-11 | 10-5 | 5-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 24-18 | 18-10 | 3-5 | 2-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 18-11 | 8-5 | 6-2 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 22, Grigor got to the 2nd round after defeating Cameron Norrie 6-72 6-1 6-4.
In the 1st round against Norrie, The Bulgarian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-72 6-1 6-4). During the match, Dimitrov scored 95 points vs Norrie’s 81. Dimitrov was very aggressive to blast 51 winners.
Talking about the service games, Dimitrov fired 18 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Grigor Dimitrov was very effective on serve to win 78% (51/65) of his 1st serve and 65% (13/20) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Dimitrov broke Norrie 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Dimitrov has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 63% of his matches (317-188). 1-0 on grass in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Dimitrov has a compiled 25-16 match record in the last years on grass.
Dimitrov’s best result of the season was getting to the semifinal in Melbourne and Carlo.
The Bulgarian has a compiled 18-11 win-loss record in 2022, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in London
Botic Van De Zandschulp
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 28-29 | 9-11 | 16-12 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-25 | 10-9 | 4-6 | 12-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-29 | 14-11 | 11-7 | 7-7 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 53-23 | 17-5 | 24-10 | 9-5 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 19-14 | 1-2 | 6-6 | 8-5 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
Ranked no. 29 (career-high), the Dutch reached the 2nd round after defeating Paul Jubb 7-65 4-6 6-1.
In the 1st round, The Dutch defeated Jubb (7-65 4-6 6-1). During the match Van De Zandschulp scored 111 points vs Jubb’s 102. Van De Zandschulp was very aggressive to blast 49 winners.
Talking about serving, Van De Zandschulp made 6 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Botic Van De Zandschulp lost the serve 3 times and he saved 11 break points. Furthermore, Van De Zandschulp put 65% of his first serves in, winning 69% (49/71) of the points behind his 1st serve and 49% (19/39) on the 2nd serve. The Dutch broke Jubb 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
The Dutch’s best result of the season was reaching the final in Munich.
Van De Zandschulp has an overall 20-14 win-loss record in 2022, 1-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in London
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2021. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Dimitrov | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 30 | 30 |
| Pts | 95-81 | 111-102 |
| Total Points | 176 | 213 |
| Winners | 51 | 49 |
| %Winners | 54% | 44% |
Both Dimitrov and Van De Zandschulp played 1 match. Both players lost a set in the event. Grigor Dimitrov dropped 1 set, while Botic Van De Zandschulp lost 1 set. Talking about their workload, Dimitrov and Van De Zandschulp have played the same amount of sets 3. They also played the same amount of games (30). Grigor scored 51 winners (54% of the total points). On the other side, Botic managed to score 49 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Dimitrov | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 18 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 18 | 6 |
| 1st in | 65/85 | 71/110 |
| %1st in | 76% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 51/65 | 49/71 |
| %1st pts | 78% | 69% |
| 2nd pts | 13/20 | 19/39 |
| %2nd pts | 65% | 49% |
Dimitrov scored 18 aces . Van De Zandschulp struck 6 aces . Dimitrov won 78% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 65% of the points. On the other side, Van De Zandschulp won 69% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 49% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Dimitrov | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 5 |
| Converted | 3/7 | 5/8 |
| % Converted | 43% | 63% |
| Conceded | 4 | 14 |
| Saved | 4 | 11 |
| % Saved | 100% | 79% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 |
Dimitrov broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. The Bulgarian very solid his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 4 break points. The Dutch broke his opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. Van De Zandschulp conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 79% of the break points that he conceded.
| Dimitrov | |||
| R1 Norrie |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-72 6-1 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
| pts | 95-81 | 95-81 | |
| Total points | 176 | 176 | |
| Winners | 51 | 51 | |
| %Winners | 54% | 54% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 18 | 18 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 65/85 | 65/85 | |
| % 1st in | 76% | 76% | |
| 1st pts | 51/65 | 51/65 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/20 | 13/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 65% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 4/4 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Van De Zandschulp | |||
| R1 Jubb |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-65 4-6 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
| pts | 111-102 | 111-102 | |
| Total points | 213 | 213 | |
| Winners | 49 | 49 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 7 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 71/110 | 71/110 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 49/71 | 49/71 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/39 | 19/39 | |
| % 2nd pts | 49% | 49% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 14 | 14 | |
| Saved | 11/14 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 79% | 79% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
WLWWWWLLWL
LWLWWLLWLW Tennis Scores in London
- Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori – Quentin HalysHalys (6-4 6-76 6-4) – See score progression
- Denis KudlaKudla – Lorenzo SonegoSonego (6-4 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Francisco CerundoloCerundolo – Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Sam QuerreyQuerrey – Diego Sebastian SchwartzmanSebastian Schwartzman (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Filip KrajinovicKrajinovic – Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Paul JubbJubb (7-65 4-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Casper RuudRuud (7-64 7-62) – See score progression
- Matteo BerrettiniBerrettini – Daniel EvansEvans (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Juan-Sebastian Cabal/Robert FarahCabal/Robert Farah – Andre Goransson/Ben McLachlanGoransson/Ben McLachlan (3-6 6-3 10-4) – See score progression
- Jack DraperDraper – Taylor Harry FritzHarry Fritz (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina – Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Marin CilicCilic – Liam BroadyBroady (6-1 4-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Alexander BublikBublik – Lorenzo MusettiMusetti (6-3 0-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Alex De MinaurDe Minaur – Reilly OpelkaOpelka (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Grigor DimitrovDimitrov – Cameron NorrieNorrie (6-72 6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Casper RuudRuud (7-6(4) 7-6(2)) – See score progression
- Francisco CerundoloCerundolo – Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Filip KrajinovicKrajinovic – Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Sam QuerreyQuerrey – Diego Sebastian SchwartzmanSebastian Schwartzman (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori – Quentin HalysHalys (6-4 6-7(6) 6-4) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Paul JubbJubb (7-6(5) 4-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Denis KudlaKudla – Lorenzo SonegoSonego (6-4 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Matteo BerrettiniBerrettini – Daniel EvansEvans (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Filip KrajinovicKrajinovic – Sam QuerreyQuerrey (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Denis KudlaKudla – Matteo BerrettiniBerrettini (3-3) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander BublikBublik – Marin CilicCilic (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Grigor DimitrovDimitrov (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Francisco CerundoloCerundolo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Frances TiafoeTiafoe – Stan WawrinkaWawrinka (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Denis ShapovalovShapovalov – Tommy PaulPaul (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alex De MinaurDe Minaur – Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Jack DraperDraper – Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori (0-0) – H2H and prediction
