Emil Ruusuvuori and Jack Draper will play each other in the 2nd round of the cinch Championships for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 5:00 pm on CENTRE COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jack Draper who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jack Draper is the pick to win this match.
Jack Draper -> 1.69
Emil Ruusuvuori -> 2.22
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Emil Ruusuvuori vs. Jack Draper
There is no head to head record between Emil Ruusuvuori and Jack Draper since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Emil Ruusuvuori
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 11-17 | 1-5 | 2-2 | 8-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 17-16 | 8-6 | 2-5 | 4-2 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-30 | 13-11 | 6-7 | 9-8 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-32 | 15-12 | 10-9 | 10-7 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 30-26 | 21-12 | 1-5 | 6-6 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 56 (career-high), Ruusuvuori got to the 2nd round after defeating Jay Clarke 6-4 6-2, Feliciano Lopez 6-3 6-73 7-68 and Quentin Halys 6-4 6-76 6-4.
In the 1st round, The Finn defeated Halys (6-4 6-76 6-4). During the match, Ruusuvuori scored 112 points vs Halys’s 104. The Finn was extremely aggressive to blast 49 winners.
Regarding the service games, Ruusuvuori recorded 8 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Emil Ruusuvuori was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 78% (49/63) of his 1st serve and 53% (17/32) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Emil broke Halys 3 times after converting 25% of his break points (3/12).
Ruusuvuori has a solid match record in the last 8 years having won 65% of his matches (215-115). 4-1 on grass in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Ruusuvuori has a compiled6-5 match record in the last 8 years on grass.
The Finn’s best result of the season was reaching the final in Pune.
Ruusuvuori has a composed 25-16 win-loss record in 2022, 4-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in London
Emil has never competed in this tournament before.
Jack Draper
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 30-9 | 14-3 | 12-4 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 39-22 | 19-10 | 5-7 | 7-3 | 8-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 34-15 | 15-8 | 3-3 | 16-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 46-19 | 12-6 | 2-2 | 26-7 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 18-16 | 6-6 | 7-5 | 3-2 | 2-2 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 99 (career-high), Draper got to the 2nd round after beating Taylor Harry Fritz 6-3 6-2.
In the 1st round, The Brit had a good straight sets win against Fritz (6-3 6-2). During the match Draper scored 65 points vs Fritz’s 46. Jack was pretty aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about serving, Draper struck 8 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Jack Draper conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 3 break points. Furthermore, Draper put 62% of his first serves in, winning 91% (30/33) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (10/20) on the 2nd serve. The Brit broke Fritz 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Jack’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in the Forli 2 Challenger,the Forli 4 Challenger,the Forli 5 Challenger and the St. Brieuc Challenger.
Draper has an aggregate 27-6 win-loss record in 2022, 2-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in London
Previously, his best result was reaching the quarter in 2021. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Ruusuvuori | Draper |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 8 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 86 | 17 |
| Pts | 303-257 | 65-46 |
| Total Points | 560 | 111 |
| Winners | 133 | 30 |
| %Winners | 44% | 46% |
Ruusuvuori played 3 matches while Draper competed in 1 match. Ruusuvuori started his run from the qualifications while Draper had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Emil Ruusuvuori dropped 2 sets while Jack Draper hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Ruusuvuori has played 6 sets more than Draper (8 vs 2). Therefore, Ruusuvuori played 69 games more than Draper. Ruusuvuori scored 133 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, Jack blasted 30 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Ruusuvuori | Draper |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 19 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 6.3 | 8 |
| 1st in | 166/250 | 33/53 |
| %1st in | 66% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 133/166 | 30/33 |
| %1st pts | 80% | 91% |
| 2nd pts | 48/84 | 10/20 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 50% |
Ruusuvuori blasted 19 aces (6.3 per match). Draper scored 8 aces . Ruusuvuori won 80% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Draper won 91% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Ruusuvuori | Draper |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 8 | 3 |
| Converted | 8/27 | 3/7 |
| % Converted | 30% | 43% |
| Conceded | 10 | 3 |
| Saved | 8 | 3 |
| % Saved | 80% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 |
The Finn broke his opponents 8 times with a 30% conversion rate. Emil dropped his serve twice and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded. Draper broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. Draper was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 3 break points.
| Ruusuvuori | |||||
| Q1 Clarke |
Q3 Lopez |
R1 Halys |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | 6-3 6-73 7-68 | 6-4 6-76 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 35 | 33 | 86 | |
| pts | 72-49 | 119-104 | 112-104 | 303-257 | |
| Total points | 121 | 223 | 216 | 560 | |
| Winners | 24 | 60 | 49 | 133 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 50% | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 3 | 8 | 8 | 19 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 28/45 | 75/110 | 63/95 | 166/250 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 68% | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 24/28 | 60/75 | 49/63 | 133/166 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 80% | 78% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/17 | 21/35 | 17/32 | 48/84 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 60% | 53% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 1 | 3 | 8 | |
| Converted | 4/11 | 1/4 | 3/12 | 8/27 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 25% | 25% | 30% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 6 | 2 | 10 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 6/6 | 1/2 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 100% | 50% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| Draper | |||||
| R1 Fritz |
Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |||
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |||
| pts | 65-46 | 65-46 | |||
| Total points | 111 | 111 | |||
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |||
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |||
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |||
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |||
| 1st in | 33/53 | 33/53 | |||
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |||
| 1st pts | 30/33 | 30/33 | |||
| % 1st pts | 91% | 91% | |||
| 2nd pts | 10/20 | 10/20 | |||
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |||
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |||
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |||
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |||
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |||
| Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |||
| Saved % | 100% | 33% | |||
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |||
Head 2 Head
LLWLWLLWWL
WLWLWWWLWW Tennis Scores in London
- Francisco CerundoloCerundolo – Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Sam QuerreyQuerrey – Diego Sebastian SchwartzmanSebastian Schwartzman (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Filip KrajinovicKrajinovic – Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Paul JubbJubb (7-65 4-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Casper RuudRuud (7-64 7-62) – See score progression
- Matteo BerrettiniBerrettini – Daniel EvansEvans (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori – Quentin HalysHalys (6-4 6-76 6-4) – See score progression
- Denis KudlaKudla – Lorenzo SonegoSonego (6-4 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Juan-Sebastian Cabal/Robert FarahCabal/Robert Farah – Andre Goransson/Ben McLachlanGoransson/Ben McLachlan (3-6 6-3 10-4) – See score progression
- Alexander BublikBublik – Lorenzo MusettiMusetti (6-3 0-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Jack DraperDraper – Taylor Harry FritzHarry Fritz (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Grigor DimitrovDimitrov – Cameron NorrieNorrie (6-72 6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Alex De MinaurDe Minaur – Reilly OpelkaOpelka (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina – Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Marin CilicCilic – Liam BroadyBroady (6-1 4-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Casper RuudRuud (7-6(4) 7-6(2)) – See score progression
- Francisco CerundoloCerundolo – Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Filip KrajinovicKrajinovic – Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Sam QuerreyQuerrey – Diego Sebastian SchwartzmanSebastian Schwartzman (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori – Quentin HalysHalys (6-4 6-7(6) 6-4) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Paul JubbJubb (7-6(5) 4-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Denis KudlaKudla – Lorenzo SonegoSonego (6-4 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Matteo BerrettiniBerrettini – Daniel EvansEvans (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Filip KrajinovicKrajinovic – Sam QuerreyQuerrey (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Denis KudlaKudla – Matteo BerrettiniBerrettini (3-3) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander BublikBublik – Marin CilicCilic (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Grigor DimitrovDimitrov (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Francisco CerundoloCerundolo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Frances TiafoeTiafoe – Stan WawrinkaWawrinka (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Denis ShapovalovShapovalov – Tommy PaulPaul (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alex De MinaurDe Minaur – Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Jack DraperDraper – Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori (0-0) – H2H and prediction
