Sam Querrey and Thomas Fabbiano will face off in the qualifications of the cinch Championships for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 1:30 pm on COURT 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Sam Querrey who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Sam Querrey is the pick to win this match.
Sam Querrey -> 1.34
Thomas Fabbiano -> 3.26
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Sam Querrey vs. Thomas Fabbiano
This will be the 3rd time that Sam Querrey and Thomas Fabbiano square off. The head to head is 2-0 for Querrey (see full H2H stats), 2-0 on grass.
The last time that they competed against each other, Querrey won 6-3 6-7(4) 6-3 in the semifinal in Eastbourne back in 2019.
Sam Querrey
7 - 9win/loss
329
11
LLLLLWWWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 8-14 | 1-5 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 6-6 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 9-16 | 2-9 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 7-5 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 3-6 | 3-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 26-17 | 7-10 | 3-1 | 8-4 | 8-2 | 0-0 |
| 2018 | 24-23 | 12-14 | 3-4 | 5-3 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 107, Querrey got to the qualifications after defeating Kamil Majchrzak 7-63 6-2.
In the qualifications, Sam had a good straight sets win against Majchrzak (7-63 6-2). During the match, Querrey scored 73 points vs Majchrzak’s 54. Querrey was quite aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Regarding the service games, Querrey struck 12 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Sam Querrey conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 1 break points. Furthermore, Querrey put 66% of his first serves in, winning 100% (38/38) of the points behind his 1st serve and 40% (8/20) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Majchrzak twice after converting 33% of his break points (2/6).
Querrey has a favorable match record in the last 10 years having won 55% of his matches (227-187). 4-2 on grass in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Querrey has a composed 51-28 record in the last years on grass.
The American has a compiled 6-9 win-loss record in 2022, 4-2 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in London
Thomas Fabbiano
21 - 19win/loss
317
70
LLWLLWLWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 22-22 | 7-6 | 8-9 | 5-4 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 18-33 | 8-12 | 5-9 | 4-9 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 3-5 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 21-31 | 7-10 | 4-10 | 2-6 | 8-5 | 0-0 |
| 2018 | 34-27 | 20-15 | 6-6 | 1-2 | 7-4 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 191, Thomas reached the qualifications after beating Alastair Gray 7-61 2-6 7-65.
In the qualifications, The Italian defeated Gray (7-61 2-6 7-65).During the match Fabbiano scored less points (8) than Gray. In fact, the world no. 107 won 110 points vs Gray’s. That means that Fabbiano was more focused during the important points. Thomas was quite aggressive to blast 48 winners.
About the serving games, Fabbiano struck 2 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Thomas Fabbiano lost the serve 3 times and he saved 9 break points. Furthermore, Fabbiano put 57% of his first serves in, winning 69% (48/70) of the points behind his 1st serve and 53% (28/53) on the 2nd serve. Thomas broke Gray once after converting 25% of his break points (1/4).
The Italian’s best result of the current year was getting to the semifinal in the Cleveland Challenger.
The Italian has an overall 21-18 win-loss record in 2022, 2-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in London
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2012. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Querrey | Fabbiano |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 21 | 34 |
| Pts | 73-54 | 110-118 |
| Total Points | 127 | 228 |
| Winners | 38 | 48 |
| %Winners | 52% | 44% |
Both Querrey and Fabbiano played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Thomas Fabbiano conceded 1 set while Sam Querrey hasn’t conceded a set so far. Querrey has played 1 set(s) less than Fabbiano (2 vs 3). Therefore, Querrey played 13 games less than Fabbiano. Querrey scored 38 winners (52% of the total points). On the other side, Thomas managed to score 48 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Querrey | Fabbiano |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 12 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 12 | 2 |
| 1st in | 38/58 | 70/123 |
| %1st in | 66% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 38/38 | 48/70 |
| %1st pts | 100% | 69% |
| 2nd pts | 8/20 | 28/53 |
| %2nd pts | 40% | 53% |
Querrey fired 12 aces . Fabbiano fired 2 aces . Querrey won 100% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 40% of the points. On the other side, Fabbiano won 69% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Querrey | Fabbiano |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 1 |
| Converted | 2/6 | 1/4 |
| % Converted | 33% | 25% |
| Conceded | 1 | 12 |
| Saved | 1 | 9 |
| % Saved | 100% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 |
Querrey broke his opponent twice with a 33% conversion rate. Sam extremely effective on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points. Fabbiano broke his opponent once with a 25% conversion rate. Thomas conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| Querrey | |||
| Q1 Majchrzak |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-63 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 73-54 | 73-54 | |
| Total points | 127 | 127 | |
| Winners | 38 | 38 | |
| %Winners | 52% | 52% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 12 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 38/58 | 38/58 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 38/38 | 38/38 | |
| % 1st pts | 100% | 100% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/20 | 8/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 40% | 40% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/6 | 2/6 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Fabbiano | |||
| Q1 Gray |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-61 2-6 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 34 | 34 | |
| pts | 110-118 | 110-118 | |
| Total points | 228 | 228 | |
| Winners | 48 | 48 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 70/123 | 70/123 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 48/70 | 48/70 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 28/53 | 28/53 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 1 | 1 | |
| Converted | 1/4 | 1/4 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
| Conceded | 12 | 12 | |
| Saved | 9/12 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Andy MurrayMurray – Lorenzo SonegoSonego (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thomas FabbianoFabbiano – Sam QuerreyQuerrey (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas – Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel EvansEvans – Matteo BerrettiniBerrettini (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Grigor DimitrovDimitrov – Cameron NorrieNorrie (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Denis KudlaKudla – Quentin HalysHalys (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Liam BroadyBroady – Marin CilicCilic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Reilly OpelkaOpelka – Alex De MinaurDe Minaur (0-4) – H2H and prediction
- Taylor Harry FritzHarry Fritz – Jack DraperDraper (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Frances TiafoeTiafoe – Stan WawrinkaWawrinka (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Denis ShapovalovShapovalov – Tommy PaulPaul (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Casper RuudRuud – Ryan PenistonPeniston (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori – Feliciano LopezLopez (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby – Filip KrajinovicKrajinovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Paul JubbJubb – Steve JohnsonJohnson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francisco CerundoloCerundolo – Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo MusettiMusetti – Alexander BublikBublik (0-0) – H2H and prediction
