Daniel Evans and Jordan Thompson will fight against each other in the final of the Nottingham Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 3:00 pm on CENTRE COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daniel Evans who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Daniel Evans is the pick to win this match.
Daniel Evans -> 1.51
Jordan Thompson -> 2.56
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Daniel Evans vs. Jordan Thompson
This will be the 3rd time that Daniel Evans and Jordan Thompson square off. The head to head is 2-0 for Evans (see full H2H stats), 2-0 on grass.
The last time that they fought against each other, Evans won 7-5 6-3 in the semifinal in Great Britain F7.
Daniel Evans
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 8-18 | 3-7 | 2-7 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 19-27 | 11-15 | 5-7 | 2-2 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 35-27 | 19-13 | 4-7 | 6-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 27-24 | 12-11 | 6-6 | 3-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 19-14 | 11-6 | 0-3 | 8-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 35, Evans reached the final after defeating Enzo Couacaud 7-5 7-63, Thomas Fabbiano 7-5 6-0, Marc-Andrea Huesler 6-4 6-4 and Jack Sock 7-5 6-3.
In the semifinal, Evans had a good straight sets win against Sock (7-5 6-3). During the match, Evans scored 80 points vs Sock’s 69. Evans was quite aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about the service games, Evans scored just 1 ace throughout the encounter and he committed only 3 double faults. Daniel Evans lost the serve twice and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Evans put 63% of his first serves in, winning 68% (30/44) of the points behind his 1st serve and 54% (14/26) on the 2nd serve. Evans broke Sock 5 times after converting 42% of his break points (5/12).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Evans hasn’t dropped yet a set in this competition to win 55% of the points he played.
Evans has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 63% of his matches (320-184). 4-0 on grass in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Evans has a composed 62-27 match record in the last years on grass.
Evans’s best result of the season was getting to the semifinal in Sydney and the Nottingham Challenger.
Daniel has a compiled 16-13 win-loss record in 2022, 4-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nottingham Challenger
Jordan Thompson
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 20-16 | 11-7 | 3-5 | 2-1 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 41-28 | 22-15 | 0-3 | 7-4 | 12-6 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 40-26 | 18-14 | 2-6 | 8-1 | 12-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-25 | 10-11 | 2-6 | 0-1 | 9-5 | 2-2 |
| 2020 | 12-13 | 6-6 | 1-2 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 74, Thompson got to the final after beating Antoine Bellier 6-3 6-4, Jay Clarke 6-4 6-4, Mikhail Kukushkin 6-2 4-6 6-3 and Alexei Popyrin 6-4 6-2.
In the semifinal, Jordan had a good straight sets win against Popyrin (6-4 6-2). During the match Thompson scored 59 points vs Popyrin’s 41. Jordan was pretty aggressive to blast 28 winners.
About the serving games, Thompson recorded 3 aces and he was quite consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Jordan Thompson was quite efficient on serve to win 82% (28/34) of his 1st serve and 80% (8/10) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Jordan broke Popyrin 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Thompson has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 56% of the points he played.
Thompson’s best result of the season was reaching the final in the Surbiton Challenger.
Thompson has a compiled 17-13 win-loss record in 2022, 9-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Evans | Thompson |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 4 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 8 | 9 |
| Tot Games | 84 | 84 |
| Pts | 287-237 | 283-223 |
| Total Points | 524 | 506 |
| Winners | 123 | 122 |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% |
Both Evans and Thompson played 4 matches. At the moment, Jordan Thompson conceded 1 set while Daniel Evans hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Evans has played 1 set(s) less than Thompson (8 vs 9). However, it is interesting to notice that they played the same amount of games (84). The Brit scored 123 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, The Australian made 122 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Evans | Thompson |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 17 | 27 |
| Avg per match | 4.3 | 6.8 |
| 1st in | 161/266 | 157/233 |
| %1st in | 61% | 67% |
| 1st pts | 123/161 | 122/157 |
| %1st pts | 76% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 62/105 | 45/76 |
| %2nd pts | 59% | 59% |
Evans fired 17 aces (4.3 per match). Thompson bagged 27 aces (6.8 per match). Evans won 76% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Thompson won 78% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Evans | Thompson |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 12 | 13 |
| Converted | 12/28 | 13/31 |
| % Converted | 43% | 42% |
| Conceded | 12 | 9 |
| Saved | 10 | 5 |
| % Saved | 83% | 56% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 4 |
The Brit broke his opponents 12 times with a 43% conversion rate. Evans lost his serve twice and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded. The Australian broke his opponents 13 times with a 42% conversion rate. The Australian conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 56% of the break points that he conceded.
| Evans | ||||||
| R1 Couacaud |
R2 Fabbiano |
1/4 Huesler |
1/2 Sock |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 7-63 | 7-5 6-0 | 6-4 6-4 | 7-5 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 18 | 20 | 21 | 84 | |
| pts | 78-71 | 68-50 | 61-47 | 80-69 | 287-237 | |
| Total points | 149 | 118 | 108 | 149 | 524 | |
| Winners | 34 | 30 | 29 | 30 | 123 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | 48% | 38% | 43% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 3 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 17 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 11 | |
| 1st in | 41/81 | 41/64 | 35/51 | 44/70 | 161/266 | |
| % 1st in | 51% | 64% | 69% | 63% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 34/41 | 30/41 | 29/35 | 30/44 | 123/161 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 73% | 83% | 68% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 24/40 | 13/23 | 11/16 | 14/26 | 62/105 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 57% | 69% | 54% | 59% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 1 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 12 | |
| Converted | 1/2 | 4/10 | 2/4 | 5/12 | 12/28 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 40% | 50% | 42% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 12 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 2/2 | 0/0 | 5/7 | 10 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | – | 71% | 68% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| Thompson | ||||||
| R1 Bellier |
R2 Clarke |
1/4 Kukushkin |
1/2 Popyrin |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | 6-4 6-4 | 6-2 4-6 6-3 | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 20 | 27 | 18 | 84 | |
| pts | 66-51 | 63-55 | 95-76 | 59-41 | 283-223 | |
| Total points | 117 | 118 | 171 | 100 | 506 | |
| Winners | 27 | 23 | 44 | 28 | 122 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 37% | 46% | 47% | 43% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 3 | 5 | 16 | 3 | 27 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 37/58 | 33/54 | 53/77 | 34/44 | 157/233 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 61% | 69% | 77% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 27/37 | 23/33 | 44/53 | 28/34 | 122/157 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 70% | 83% | 82% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/21 | 9/21 | 11/24 | 8/10 | 45/76 | |
| % 2nd pts | 81% | 43% | 46% | 80% | 59% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 2 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 13 | |
| Converted | 2/3 | 5/11 | 3/8 | 3/9 | 13/31 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 45% | 38% | 33% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 9 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 2/5 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 40% | 0% | – | 35% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWWLWLLL
LWLWWWLLLL Tennis Scores in Nottingham Challenger
- Jonny O’Mara/Ken SkupskiO’Mara/Ken Skupski – Julian Cash/Henry PattenCash/Henry Patten (3-6 6-2 16-14) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Daniel EvansEvans – Jordan ThompsonThompson (2-0) – H2H and prediction
