Emilio Gomez and Roberto Quiroz will play each other in the quarter of the Orlando Challenger for the 4th time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 1:30 pm on COURT 3. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Emilio Gomez who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Emilio Gomez is the pick to win this match.
Emilio Gomez -> 1.444
Roberto Quiroz -> 2.77
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Emilio Gomez vs. Roberto Quiroz
This will be the 4th time that Emilio Gomez and Roberto Quiroz face off. The head to head is 2-1 for Gomez (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they squared off, Gomez won 6-3 7-6(10) in the 1st round in the Campinas Challenger back in 2020.
Emilio Gomez
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6-11 | 0-2 | 6-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 16-28 | 8-16 | 2-6 | 5-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 47-26 | 38-15 | 1-3 | 8-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 37-33 | 25-15 | 9-11 | 3-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 12-15 | 2-5 | 4-6 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 155, the Ecuadorian reached the quarter after defeating Zhizhen Zhang 6-4 6-4 and Malek Jaziri 7-64 6-2.
In the 2nd round, Emilio had a good straight sets win against Jaziri (7-64 6-2). During the match, Gomez scored 79 points vs Jaziri’s 63. The Ecuadorian was pretty aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Talking about the service games, Gomez fired 2 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Emilio Gomez lost the serve once and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Gomez put 63% of his first serves in, winning 83% (38/46) of the points behind his 1st serve and 41% (11/27) on the 2nd serve. Emilio was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Jaziri 3 times.
Overall Performance in this tournament
Gomez hasn’t surrendered yet a set in this competition to conquer 55% of the points he played.
Gomez has a good record in the last 10 years having won 58% of his matches (325-236). 14-7 on hard in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Gomez has an aggregate 156-94 match record in the last years on hard.
Emilio’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in the Salinas Challenger.
The Ecuadorian has an overall 18-13 win-loss record in 2022, 14-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Orlando Challenger
Roberto Quiroz
22 - 17win/loss
306
172
LLLLWLLLLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 31-31 | 14-12 | 12-13 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 17-35 | 8-13 | 6-12 | 3-9 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 14-10 | 6-3 | 1-3 | 7-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 29-32 | 12-16 | 11-9 | 5-6 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2018 | 36-31 | 15-10 | 14-17 | 5-3 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 335, Quiroz got to the quarter after beating Michael Mmoh 7-5 6-3 and Matija Pecotic 7-5 7-66.
In the 2nd round, The Ecuadorian had a good straight sets win against Pecotic (7-5 7-66). During the match Quiroz scored 74 points vs Pecotic’s 70. The Ecuadorian was pretty aggressive to blast 34 winners.
About the serving games, Quiroz scored 2 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Roberto Quiroz was quite effective on serve to win 81% (34/42) of his 1st serve and 56% (14/25) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The Ecuadorian was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Pecotic 3 times.
Overall Performance in this tournament
Roberto hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 53% of the points he played.
The Ecuadorian’s best result of the season was getting to the semifinal in M25 Cancun and the Salinas Challenger.
Roberto has a compiled 22-16 win-loss record in 2022, 11-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Orlando Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2021 and 2021. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gomez | Quiroz |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 4 |
| Tot Games | 41 | 46 |
| Pts | 156-128 | 143-128 |
| Total Points | 284 | 271 |
| Winners | 59 | 64 |
| %Winners | 38% | 45% |
Both Gomez and Quiroz played 2 matches. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Gomez and Quiroz have played the same amount of sets 4. However, Gomez played 5 games less than Quiroz. Gomez scored 59 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, The Ecuadorian made 64 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gomez | Quiroz |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 2.5 |
| 1st in | 81/132 | 82/129 |
| %1st in | 61% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 59/81 | 64/82 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 22/51 | 28/47 |
| %2nd pts | 43% | 60% |
Gomez fired 4 aces (2 per match). Quiroz struck 5 aces (2.5 per match). Gomez won 73% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 43% of the points. On the other side, Quiroz won 78% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 60% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gomez | Quiroz |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 9 | 6 |
| Converted | 9/17 | 6/8 |
| % Converted | 53% | 75% |
| Conceded | 11 | 7 |
| Saved | 6 | 5 |
| % Saved | 55% | 71% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 2 |
The Ecuadorian broke his opponents 9 times with a 53% conversion rate. Gomez surrendered his serve 5 times and he saved 55% of the break points that he conceded. The Ecuadorian broke his opponents 6 times with a 75% conversion rate. Quiroz conceded his serve twice and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded.
| Gomez | ||||
| R1 Zhang |
R2 Jaziri |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | 7-64 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 21 | 41 | |
| pts | 77-65 | 79-63 | 156-128 | |
| Total points | 142 | 142 | 284 | |
| Winners | 21 | 38 | 59 | |
| %Winners | 27% | 48% | 38% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 35/59 | 46/73 | 81/132 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 63% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 21/35 | 38/46 | 59/81 | |
| % 1st pts | 60% | 83% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/24 | 11/27 | 22/51 | |
| % 2nd pts | 46% | 41% | 43% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 6 | 3 | 9 | |
| Converted | 6/14 | 3/3 | 9/17 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 100% | 53% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 5 | 11 | |
| Saved | 2/6 | 4/5 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 80% | 57% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 1 | 5 | |
| Quiroz | ||||
| R1 Mmoh |
R2 Pecotic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-3 | 7-5 7-66 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 25 | 46 | |
| pts | 69-58 | 74-70 | 143-128 | |
| Total points | 127 | 144 | 271 | |
| Winners | 30 | 34 | 64 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 46% | 45% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 40/62 | 42/67 | 82/129 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 63% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 30/40 | 34/42 | 64/82 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 81% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/22 | 14/25 | 28/47 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 56% | 60% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/3 | 6/8 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 100% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 3 | 7 | |
| Saved | 4/4 | 1/3 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 33% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLLLWWLW
Tennis Scores in Orlando Challenger
- Andrew Harris/Christian HarrisonHarris/Christian Harrison – Yibing Wu/Zhizhen ZhangWu/Zhizhen Zhang (7-66 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Malek JaziriJaziri – Michail PervolarakisPervolarakis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto QuirozQuiroz – Emilio GomezGomez (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler – Ulises BlanchBlanch (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yibing WuWu – Christopher EubanksEubanks (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jeff WolfWolf – Tung-Lin WuWu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
