Robin Haase and Ernests Gulbis will square off in the 1st round of the Forli 6 Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Tuesday at 3:00 pm on GRAND STAND. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Robin Haase who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Robin Haase is the pick to win this match.
Robin Haase -> 1.51
Ernests Gulbis -> 2.49
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Robin Haase vs. Ernests Gulbis
This will be the 3rd time that Robin Haase and Ernests Gulbis clash against each other. The head to head is 1-1 (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they played, Haase won 7-6(6) 6-4 in the qualifications in the Forli 6 Challenger back in May 2022.
Robin Haase
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2023 | 4-8 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 26-26 | 4-5 | 13-12 | 8-7 | 0-1 | 1-1 |
2021 | 17-19 | 4-4 | 9-11 | 3-2 | 1-1 | 0-1 |
2020 | 9-11 | 5-3 | 3-4 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2019 | 19-28 | 6-9 | 5-11 | 6-4 | 2-3 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 265, Robin got to the 1st round after beating Filippo Baldi 6-4 6-3 and Ernests Gulbis 7-66 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Dutch had a good straight sets win against Gulbis (7-66 6-4). During the match, Haase scored 77 points vs Gulbis’s 65. Haase was exceptionally aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about the service games, Haase scored 6 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Robin Haase lost the serve 3 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Haase put 64% of his first serves in, winning 74% (31/42) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (12/24) on the 2nd serve. Robin broke Gulbis 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Dutch started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t surrendered yet a set in this competition to conquer 55% of the points he played.
Haase has a good record in the last 10 years having won 52% of his matches (271-247). 9-6 on clay in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Haase has an overall 136-102 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
Robin’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in the Shymkent 2 Challenger.
Haase has a compiled 14-12 win-loss record in 2022, 9-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Forli 6 Challenger
Ernests Gulbis
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2023 | 5-3 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 27-21 | 3-2 | 17-13 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 13-21 | 2-4 | 6-9 | 3-6 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
2020 | 20-13 | 9-4 | 3-6 | 8-2 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
2019 | 8-30 | 3-9 | 1-9 | 4-8 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 384, the Latvian reached the 1st round after beating Kirill Kivattsev 6-3 6-3.
Gulbis’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in the Cherbourg Challenger.
Gulbis has a composed 13-10 win-loss record in 2022, 5-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Haase | Gulbis |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 1 |
Tot Set | 4 | 2 |
Tot Games | 42 | 18 |
Pts | 146-118 | 63-49 |
Total Points | 264 | 112 |
Winners | 57 | 24 |
%Winners | 39% | 38% |
Haase played 2 matches while Gulbis competed in 1 match. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Haase has played 2 sets more than Gulbis (4 vs 2). Therefore, Haase played 24 games more than Gulbis. Robin scored 57 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, The Latvian struck 24 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Haase | Gulbis |
---|---|---|
Aces | 9 | 2 |
Avg per match | 4.5 | 2 |
1st in | 77/114 | 29/59 |
%1st in | 68% | 49% |
1st pts | 57/77 | 24/29 |
%1st pts | 74% | 83% |
2nd pts | 20/37 | 11/30 |
%2nd pts | 54% | 37% |
Haase made 9 aces (4.5 per match). Gulbis bagged 2 aces . Haase won 74% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, Gulbis won 83% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 37% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Haase | Gulbis |
---|---|---|
Won | 8 | 5 |
Converted | 8/15 | 5/5 |
% Converted | 53% | 100% |
Conceded | 7 | 2 |
Saved | 3 | 0 |
% Saved | 43% | 0% |
Times Broken | 4 | 2 |
Haase broke his opponents 8 times with a 53% conversion rate. The Dutch dropped his serve 4 times and he saved 43% of the break points that he conceded. The Latvian broke his opponent 5 times with a 100% conversion rate. The Latvian conceded his serve twice and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
Haase | ||||
Q1 Baldi |
Q3 Gulbis |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-3 | 7-66 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 23 | 42 | |
pts | 69-53 | 77-65 | 146-118 | |
Total points | 122 | 142 | 264 | |
Winners | 26 | 31 | 57 | |
%Winners | 38% | 40% | 39% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 3 | 6 | 9 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
1st in | 35/48 | 42/66 | 77/114 | |
% 1st in | 73% | 64% | 68% | |
1st pts | 26/35 | 31/42 | 57/77 | |
% 1st pts | 74% | 74% | 74% | |
2nd pts | 8/13 | 12/24 | 20/37 | |
% 2nd pts | 62% | 50% | 54% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 4 | 4 | 8 | |
Converted | 4/8 | 4/7 | 8/15 | |
Converted % | 50% | 57% | 53% | |
Conceded | 1 | 6 | 7 | |
Saved | 0/1 | 3/6 | 3 | |
Saved % | 0% | 50% | 25% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Gulbis | ||||
Q1 Kivattsev |
Q3 Haase |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-3 | 7-66 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 23 | 41 | |
pts | 63-49 | – | 63-49 | |
Total points | 112 | 0 | 112 | |
Winners | 24 | 24 | ||
%Winners | 38% | 0% | 38% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 4 | ||
1st in | 29/59 | / | 29/59 | |
% 1st in | 49% | 0% | 49% | |
1st pts | 24/29 | / | 24/29 | |
% 1st pts | 83% | 0% | 83% | |
2nd pts | 11/30 | / | 11/30 | |
% 2nd pts | 37% | 0% | 37% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 5 | 5 | ||
Converted | 5/5 | / | 5/5 | |
Converted % | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
Conceded | 2 | 2 | ||
Saved | 0/2 | 0/ | 0 | |
Saved % | 0% | – | 0% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Forli 6 Challenger
- Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri – Hugo DellienDellien (7-65 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Taro DanielDaniel – Federico GaioGaio (7-65 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Constant LestienneLestienne (6-3 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Riccardo BonadioBonadio – Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux (6-3 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Gastao EliasElias – Borna CoricCoric (3-6 7-65 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Robin HaaseHaase – Ernests GulbisGulbis (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi – Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Salvatore CarusoCaruso – Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano (2-3) – H2H and prediction
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Andrea CollariniCollarini (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Thomas FabbianoFabbiano (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – Franco AgamenoneAgamenone (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo MusettiMusetti – Timofey SkatovSkatov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo (0-1) – H2H and prediction