Roman Andres Burruchaga and Nick Chappell will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Little Rock Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:30 pm on COURT 13. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Roman Andres Burruchaga who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Roman Andres Burruchaga is the pick to win this match.
Roman Andres Burruchaga -> 1.44
Nick Chappell -> 2.7
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Roman Andres Burruchaga vs. Nick Chappell
There is no head to head record between Roman Andres Burruchaga and Nick Chappell since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Roman Andres Burruchaga
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 56-31 | 4-5 | 51-25 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 44-28 | 2-3 | 40-24 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 39-30 | 4-2 | 35-28 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 45-32 | 5-3 | 40-29 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 43-24 | 18-9 | 25-15 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 443, Roman got to the qualifications after beating Nicolas Alvarez 6-3 6-2.
In the qualifications, The Argentine had a good straight sets win against Alvarez (6-3 6-2). During the match, Andres Burruchaga scored 68 points vs Alvarez’s 50. Roman was quite aggressive to blast 20 winners.
Regarding the service games, Andres Burruchaga struck 3 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Roman Andres Burruchaga lost the serve twice and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Andres Burruchaga put 46% of his first serves in, winning 67% (20/30) of the points behind his 1st serve and 57% (20/35) on the 2nd serve. Andres Burruchaga broke Alvarez 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
Andres Burruchaga has a winning match record in the last 4 years having won 58% of his matches (68-49). 1-0 on hard in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Andres Burruchaga has a compiled24-15 record in the last 4 years on hard.
Andres Burruchaga’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Antalya.
Roman has a composed 14-11 win-loss record in 2022, 1-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Little Rock Challenger
The Argentine has never competed in this tournament before.
Nick Chappell
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 6-9 | 6-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 24-26 | 19-18 | 1-4 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 44-36 | 38-25 | 2-4 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 23-33 | 14-16 | 7-8 | 2-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 21-35 | 14-16 | 4-12 | 3-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 472, the American reached the qualifications after beating Govind Nanda 6-1 4-6 6-2.
In the qualifications, Nick defeated Nanda (6-1 4-6 6-2). During the match Chappell scored 95 points vs Nanda’s 83. Nick was extremely aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about serving, Chappell recorded 3 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Nick Chappell lost the serve twice and he saved 9 break points. Furthermore, Chappell put 56% of his first serves in, winning 64% (32/50) of the points behind his 1st serve and 60% (24/40) on the 2nd serve. Nick broke Nanda 5 times after converting 45% of his break points (5/11).
The American’s best result of the season was getting to the semifinal in M25 Cancun.
Nick has an aggregate 7-13 win-loss record in 2022, 4-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Little Rock Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2021. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Andres Burruchaga | Chappell |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 25 |
| Pts | 68-50 | 95-83 |
| Total Points | 118 | 178 |
| Winners | 20 | 32 |
| %Winners | 29% | 34% |
Both Andres Burruchaga and Chappell played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Nick Chappell dropped 1 set while Roman Andres Burruchaga hasn’t dropped a set so far. Andres Burruchaga has played 1 set(s) less than Chappell (2 vs 3). Therefore, Andres Burruchaga played 8 games less than Chappell. Andres Burruchaga scored 20 winners (29% of the total points). On the other side, The American made 32 winners (34%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Andres Burruchaga | Chappell |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 3 |
| 1st in | 30/65 | 50/90 |
| %1st in | 46% | 56% |
| 1st pts | 20/30 | 32/50 |
| %1st pts | 67% | 64% |
| 2nd pts | 20/35 | 24/40 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 60% |
Andres Burruchaga struck 3 aces . Chappell recorded 3 aces . Andres Burruchaga won 67% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Chappell won 64% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 60% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Andres Burruchaga | Chappell |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 5 |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/11 |
| % Converted | 71% | 45% |
| Conceded | 10 | 11 |
| Saved | 8 | 9 |
| % Saved | 80% | 82% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Roman broke his opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. Roman lost his serve twice and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded. Nick broke his opponent 5 times with a 45% conversion rate. Nick conceded his serve twice and he saved 82% of the break points that he conceded.
| Andres Burruchaga | |||
| Q1 Alvarez |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 68-50 | 68-50 | |
| Total points | 118 | 118 | |
| Winners | 20 | 20 | |
| %Winners | 29% | 29% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 30/65 | 30/65 | |
| % 1st in | 46% | 46% | |
| 1st pts | 20/30 | 20/30 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/35 | 20/35 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
| Saved | 8/10 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Chappell | |||
| Q1 Nanda |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 4-6 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 25 | |
| pts | 95-83 | 95-83 | |
| Total points | 178 | 178 | |
| Winners | 32 | 32 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 50/90 | 50/90 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 32/50 | 32/50 | |
| % 1st pts | 64% | 64% | |
| 2nd pts | 24/40 | 24/40 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/11 | 5/11 | |
| Converted % | 45% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 11 | 11 | |
| Saved | 9/11 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 82% | 82% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLWWLWW
LWLWWLLWWL
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Adrian Menendez-MaceirasMenendez-Maceiras – Yunseong ChungChung (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian FanselowFanselow – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Andrew HarrisHarris – Brandon HoltHolt (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gonzalo VillanuevaVillanueva – Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zhizhen ZhangZhang – Tung-Lin WuWu (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Ergi KirkinKirkin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek – Malek JaziriJaziri (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ulises BlanchBlanch – Roberto QuirozQuiroz (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jeff WolfWolf – Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gilbert Soares Klier JuniorSoares Klier Junior – Dane SweenySweeny (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Keegan SmithSmith – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
