Tristan Lamasine and Carlos Gimeno Valero will face off in the qualifications of the Zagreb Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 10:00 am on CENTRE COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Carlos Gimeno Valero who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Carlos Gimeno Valero is the pick to win this match.
Carlos Gimeno Valero -> 1.36
Tristan Lamasine -> 3.00
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Tristan Lamasine vs. Carlos Gimeno Valero
There is no head to head record between Tristan Lamasine and Carlos Gimeno Valero since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Tristan Lamasine
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 26-34 | 0-3 | 5-17 | 21-14 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 59-23 | 4-1 | 23-9 | 30-11 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
| 2022 | 22-27 | 0-0 | 14-18 | 8-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-27 | 3-3 | 14-17 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2020 | 11-16 | 6-3 | 2-6 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 329, the French player reached the qualifications after beating Pawel Cias 6-4 6-3.
In the qualifications, The French player had a good straight sets win against Cias (6-4 6-3). During the match, Lamasine scored 60 points vs Cias’s 43. The French player was very aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Talking about the service games, Lamasine bagged 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Tristan Lamasine lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Lamasine put 65% of his first serves in, winning 68% (23/34) of the points behind his 1st serve and 67% (12/18) on the 2nd serve. The French player was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Cias 4 times.
Lamasine has a favorable match record in the last 10 years having won 54% of his matches (306-258). 4-5 on clay in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Lamasine has an overall 126-115 match record in the last years on clay.
Tristan has an aggregate 9-11 win-loss record in 2022, 4-5 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Zagreb Challenger
The French player has never competed in this tournament before.
Carlos Gimeno Valero
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23-8 | 0-0 | 23-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 25-16 | 0-0 | 25-16 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 18-15 | 0-0 | 18-15 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 24-16 | 3-2 | 20-13 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 14-5 | 5-1 | 9-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 369, the Spaniard reached the qualifications after defeating Bozo Barun 6-3 7-61.
In the qualifications, The Spaniard had a good straight sets win against Barun (6-3 7-61). During the match Gimeno scored 92 points vs Barun’s 80. Gimeno was pretty aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about serving, Gimeno scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 4 double faults. Carlos Gimeno Valero lost the serve twice and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Gimeno put 57% of his first serves in, winning 60% (30/50) of the points behind his 1st serve and 62% (23/37) on the 2nd serve. The Spaniard broke Barun 3 times after converting 38% of his break points (3/8).
Gimeno has a composed 12-10 win-loss record in 2022, 12-10 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Lamasine | Gimeno |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 22 |
| Pts | 60-43 | 92-80 |
| Total Points | 103 | 172 |
| Winners | 23 | 30 |
| %Winners | 38% | 33% |
Both Lamasine and Gimeno played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Lamasine and Gimeno have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Lamasine played 3 games less than Gimeno. Tristan scored 23 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Carlos made 30 winners (33%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Lamasine | Gimeno |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 1 |
| 1st in | 34/52 | 50/87 |
| %1st in | 65% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 23/34 | 30/50 |
| %1st pts | 68% | 60% |
| 2nd pts | 12/18 | 23/37 |
| %2nd pts | 67% | 62% |
Lamasine struck 2 aces . Gimeno scored 1 ace . Lamasine won 68% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 67% of the points. On the other side, Gimeno won 60% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Lamasine | Gimeno |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 3 |
| Converted | 4/4 | 3/8 |
| % Converted | 100% | 38% |
| Conceded | 5 | 10 |
| Saved | 3 | 8 |
| % Saved | 60% | 80% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Tristan broke his opponent 4 times with a 100% conversion rate. The French player surrendered his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded. Carlos broke his opponent 3 times with a 38% conversion rate. The Spaniard conceded his serve twice and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded.
| Lamasine | |||
| Q1 Cias |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 60-43 | 60-43 | |
| Total points | 103 | 103 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 34/52 | 34/52 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 23/34 | 23/34 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/18 | 12/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 67% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/4 | 4/4 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Gimeno | |||
| Q1 Barun |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-61 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 92-80 | 92-80 | |
| Total points | 172 | 172 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 50/87 | 50/87 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 30/50 | 30/50 | |
| % 1st pts | 60% | 60% | |
| 2nd pts | 23/37 | 23/37 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/8 | 3/8 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
| Saved | 8/10 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLWLLWWL
LWLWLWWLLW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Go SoedaSoeda – Maximilian NeuchristNeuchrist (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mirza BasicBasic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Filip HoranskyHoransky (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Andrey KuznetsovKuznetsov – Aleksandar VukicVukic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan LamasineLamasine – Carlos Gimeno ValeroGimeno Valero (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Attila BalazsBalazs (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nerman FaticFatic – Andrey ChepelevChepelev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Nicolas KickerKicker (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zhizhen ZhangZhang – Yibing WuWu (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alexandre MullerMuller – Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Felipe Meligeni Rodrigues AlvesMeligeni Rodrigues Alves – Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic – Blaz RolaRola (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Filip MisolicMisolic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Fabian MarozsanMarozsan – Aldin SetkicSetkic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
