
Lukas Rosol and Denis Yevseyev will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Prague 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 1:00 pm on CENTRE COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Lukas Rosol who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Lukas Rosol is the pick to win this match.
Lukas Rosol -> 1.124
Denis Yevseyev -> 5.75
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Lukas Rosol vs. Denis Yevseyev
There is no head to head record between Lukas Rosol and Denis Yevseyev since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Lukas Rosol
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 13-21 | 4-7 | 9-12 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 47-30 | 14-7 | 19-16 | 11-5 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 13-26 | 0-2 | 5-14 | 7-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 12-10 | 4-4 | 8-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 35-37 | 8-11 | 9-11 | 11-11 | 7-3 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 249, Lukas reached the qualifications after defeating Michael Vrbensky 7-5 6-3.
In the qualifications, The Czech had a good straight sets win against Vrbensky (7-5 6-3). During the match, Rosol scored 76 points vs Vrbensky’s 62. Rosol was quite aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Regarding the service games, Rosol managed to score 5 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Overall, Lukas Rosol was exceptionally effective on serve to win 71% (25/35) of his 1st serve and 52% (14/27) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The Czech broke Vrbensky 5 times after converting 38% of his break points (5/13).
Rosol has a positive record in the last 10 years having won 52% of his matches (293-266). 10-9 on clay in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Rosol has a compiled 136-106 match record in the last years on clay.
Lukas’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M25 Sharm ElSheikh.
Lukas has an overall 21-13 win-loss record in 2022, 10-9 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Prague 2 Challenger
Denis Yevseyev
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 35-42 | 19-15 | 9-16 | 7-10 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 35-37 | 14-14 | 12-13 | 7-8 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 50-36 | 23-16 | 16-14 | 11-5 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 39-31 | 11-9 | 12-12 | 14-9 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2021 | 36-30 | 4-5 | 22-15 | 10-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 345, Yevseyev got to the qualifications after defeating Lukas Velik 6-3 6-1.
In the qualifications, The Kazakhstani had a good straight sets win against Velik (6-3 6-1). During the match Yevseyev scored 67 points vs Velik’s 42. Denis was very aggressive to blast 19 winners.
Talking about serving, Yevseyev was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 3 double faults. Denis Yevseyev was very effective on serve to win 76% (19/25) of his 1st serve and 68% (19/28) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Denis broke Velik 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
The Kazakhstani’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M25 Vilnius.
Yevseyev has an aggregate 17-8 win-loss record in 2022, 4-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Rosol | Yevseyev |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 21 | 16 |
| Pts | 76-62 | 67-42 |
| Total Points | 138 | 109 |
| Winners | 25 | 19 |
| %Winners | 33% | 28% |
Both Rosol and Yevseyev played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Rosol and Yevseyev have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Rosol played 5 games more than Yevseyev. Rosol scored 25 winners (33% of the total points). On the other side, Yevseyev scored 19 winners (28%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Rosol | Yevseyev |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 0 |
| 1st in | 35/62 | 25/53 |
| %1st in | 56% | 47% |
| 1st pts | 25/35 | 19/25 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 14/27 | 19/28 |
| %2nd pts | 52% | 68% |
Rosol blasted 5 aces . Yevseyev didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Rosol won 71% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Yevseyev won 76% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 68% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Rosol | Yevseyev |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 4 |
| Converted | 5/13 | 4/11 |
| % Converted | 38% | 36% |
| Conceded | 6 | 3 |
| Saved | 4 | 3 |
| % Saved | 67% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 |
Rosol broke his opponent 5 times with a 38% conversion rate. The Czech surrendered his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. The Kazakhstani broke his opponent 4 times with a 36% conversion rate. The Kazakhstani was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 3 break points.
| Rosol | |||
| Q1 Vrbensky |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 76-62 | 76-62 | |
| Total points | 138 | 138 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 35/62 | 35/62 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 25/35 | 25/35 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/27 | 14/27 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/13 | 5/13 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Yevseyev | |||
| Q1 Velik |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 67-42 | 67-42 | |
| Total points | 109 | 109 | |
| Winners | 19 | 19 | |
| %Winners | 28% | 28% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 25/53 | 25/53 | |
| % 1st in | 47% | 47% | |
| 1st pts | 19/25 | 19/25 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/28 | 19/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 68% | 68% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/11 | 4/11 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLWLWWW Upcoming matches in the draw
- Lukas RosolRosol – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marius CopilCopil – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Illya MarchenkoMarchenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Riccardo BonadioBonadio – Nuno BorgesBorges (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Kaichi UchidaUchida – Lucas GerchGerch (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Max PurcellPurcell – Matteo DonatiDonati (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Ryan PenistonPeniston (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan FurnessFurness – Sebastian OfnerOfner (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Mirza BasicBasic (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Clement TaburTabur – Tristan LamasineLamasine (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marvin MoellerMoeller – Yshai OlielOliel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Martin KrumichKrumich (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel MichalskiMichalski – Tobias KamkeKamke (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Pedro CachinCachin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrew PaulsonPaulson – Maximilian MartererMarterer (0-0) – H2H and prediction








