Hugo Grenier and Kenny de Schepper will play each other in the 2nd round of the Rome 1 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 1:30 pm on CAMPO CENTRALE. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Hugo Grenier who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Hugo Grenier is the pick to win this match.
Hugo Grenier -> 1.47
Kenny de Schepper -> 2.68
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Hugo Grenier vs. Kenny de Schepper
There is no head to head record between Hugo Grenier and Kenny de Schepper since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Hugo Grenier
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 32-28 | 23-14 | 2-8 | 4-4 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-33 | 15-8 | 7-10 | 4-11 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 35-35 | 21-14 | 9-10 | 1-8 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 43-28 | 22-9 | 9-8 | 12-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 19-16 | 7-2 | 5-9 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
Ranked no. 154, Grenier reached the 2nd round after beating Antoine Hoang 6-3 4-6 6-4.
In the 1st round, Grenier defeated Hoang (6-3 4-6 6-4). During the match, Grenier scored 103 points vs Hoang’s 86. Hugo was very aggressive to blast 44 winners.
Regarding the service games, Grenier struck 5 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Hugo Grenier lost the serve 5 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Grenier put 68% of his first serves in, winning 67% (44/66) of the points behind his 1st serve and 42% (13/31) on the 2nd serve. The French player broke Hoang 7 times after converting 58% of his break points (7/12).
Grenier has a winning record in the last 8 years having won 59% of his matches (280-192). 2-3 on clay in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Grenier has a compiled37-45 win-loss record in the last 8 years on clay.
Grenier has an overall 6-13 win-loss record in 2022, 2-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Rome 1 Challenger
Kenny de Schepper
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24-24 | 7-5 | 4-8 | 13-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-29 | 7-4 | 8-14 | 12-10 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-35 | 6-7 | 18-16 | 17-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 38-24 | 22-8 | 5-5 | 11-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 20-10 | 6-4 | 9-3 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 449, the French player reached the 2nd round after defeating Alexey Vatutin 6-4 6-4, Dan Added 6-4 6-0 and Altug Celikbilek 6-3 5-7 6-4.
In the 1st round, The French player defeated Celikbilek (6-3 5-7 6-4). During the match de Schepper scored 100 points vs Celikbilek’s 97. Kenny was exceptionally aggressive to blast 51 winners.
Talking about serving, de Schepper fired 6 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Kenny de Schepper lost the serve 3 times and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, de Schepper put 69% of his first serves in, winning 74% (51/69) of the points behind his 1st serve and 39% (12/31) on the 2nd serve. The French player broke Celikbilek 4 times after converting 29% of his break points (4/14).
Kenny’s best result of the season was reaching the final in Balma.
De Schepper has a compiled 15-8 win-loss record in 2022, 4-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Rome 1 Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2016. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Grenier | de Schepper |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 29 | 67 |
| Pts | 103-86 | 223-195 |
| Total Points | 189 | 418 |
| Winners | 44 | 104 |
| %Winners | 43% | 47% |
Grenier played 1 match while de Schepper competed in 3 matches. de Schepper started his run from the qualifications while Grenier had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Hugo Grenier dropped 1 set, while Kenny de Schepper surrendered 1 set. Grenier has played 4 set(s) less than de Schepper (3 vs 7). Therefore, Grenier played 38 games less than de Schepper. Grenier scored 44 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, De Schepper scored 104 winners (47%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Grenier | de Schepper |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 17 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 5.7 |
| 1st in | 66/97 | 146/208 |
| %1st in | 68% | 70% |
| 1st pts | 44/66 | 104/146 |
| %1st pts | 67% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 13/31 | 29/62 |
| %2nd pts | 42% | 47% |
Grenier scored 5 aces . de Schepper managed to score 17 aces (5.7 per match). Grenier won 67% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 42% of the points. On the other side, de Schepper won 71% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 47% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Grenier | de Schepper |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 13 |
| Converted | 7/12 | 13/27 |
| % Converted | 58% | 48% |
| Conceded | 11 | 21 |
| Saved | 6 | 15 |
| % Saved | 55% | 71% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 6 |
Hugo broke his opponent 7 times with a 58% conversion rate. Grenier conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 55% of the break points that he conceded. De Schepper broke his opponents 13 times with a 48% conversion rate. The French player conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded.
| Grenier | |||
| R1 Hoang |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 4-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 103-86 | 103-86 | |
| Total points | 189 | 189 | |
| Winners | 44 | 44 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 66/97 | 66/97 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 44/66 | 44/66 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/31 | 13/31 | |
| % 2nd pts | 42% | 42% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/12 | 7/12 | |
| Converted % | 58% | 58% | |
| Conceded | 11 | 11 | |
| Saved | 6/11 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 55% | 55% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
| de Schepper | |||||
| Q1 Vatutin |
Q3 Added |
R1 Celikbilek |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | 6-4 6-0 | 6-3 5-7 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 16 | 31 | 67 | |
| pts | 63-55 | 60-43 | 100-97 | 223-195 | |
| Total points | 118 | 103 | 197 | 418 | |
| Winners | 28 | 25 | 51 | 104 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 42% | 51% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 6 | 5 | 6 | 17 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 44/62 | 33/46 | 69/100 | 146/208 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 72% | 69% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 28/44 | 25/33 | 51/69 | 104/146 | |
| % 1st pts | 64% | 76% | 74% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/18 | 6/13 | 12/31 | 29/62 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 46% | 39% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 5 | 4 | 13 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 5/8 | 4/14 | 13/27 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 63% | 29% | 48% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 3 | 10 | 21 | |
| Saved | 6/8 | 2/3 | 7/10 | 15 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 67% | 70% | 212% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLWLWWWL
LWWLWWLLWL Tennis Scores in Rome 1 Challenger
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Matteo ArnaldiArnaldi (6-1 3-6 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri – Jack DraperDraper (6-1 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Jonathan EyssericEysseric (6-4 2-6 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Quentin HalysHalys – Michael GeertsGeerts (7-61 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Thomas FabbianoFabbiano – Flavio CobolliCobolli (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Denis YevseyevYevseyev – Gian Marco MoroniMarco Moroni (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Quentin HalysHalys – Jesper De JongDe Jong (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo GrenierGrenier – Kenny de Schepperde Schepper (0-0) – H2H and prediction
