Chun Hsin Tseng and Lucas Miedler will face off in the 2nd round of the Prague 1 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 11:00 am on CENTRE COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Chun Hsin Tseng who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Chun Hsin Tseng is the pick to win this match.
Chun Hsin Tseng -> 1.171
Lucas Miedler -> 5.05
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Chun Hsin Tseng vs. Lucas Miedler
There is no head to head record between Chun Hsin Tseng and Lucas Miedler since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Chun Hsin Tseng
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 18-12 | 7-7 | 11-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 21-25 | 9-8 | 12-15 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 39-27 | 11-12 | 28-11 | 0-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 39-25 | 9-8 | 30-15 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 22-13 | 7-5 | 4-4 | 11-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 127, Hsin Tseng reached the 2nd round after beating Alejandro Moro Canas 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round, The Chinese had a good straight sets win against Moro Canas (6-4 6-4). During the match, Hsin Tseng scored 79 points vs Moro Canas’s 68. The Chinese was very aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Regarding the service games, Hsin Tseng couldn’t to score even 1 ace and he was quite solid in conceding no double faults. Chun Hsin Tseng lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Hsin Tseng put 61% of his first serves in, winning 70% (30/43) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (12/27) on the 2nd serve. Chun broke Moro Canas 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Hsin Tseng has a solid win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 63% of his matches (147-87). 12-2 on clay in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Hsin Tseng has a compiled59-34 record in the last 7 years on clay.
Hsin Tseng’s best result of the year was getting to the final in the Bengalaru 1 Challenger,the Roseto Degli Abruzzi 2 Challenger and the Murcia Challenger.
Hsin Tseng has an overall 17-6 win-loss record in 2022, 12-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Prague 1 Challenger
Lucas Miedler
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 22-22 | 4-1 | 16-14 | 2-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 35-32 | 13-6 | 14-18 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
| 2020 | 14-17 | 2-3 | 10-7 | 0-6 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 313, Miedler reached the 2nd round after beating Rudolf Molleker 7-5 7-63, Sebastian Fanselow 6-4 6-3 and Tristan Lamasine 2-6 6-2 6-3.
In the 1st round against Lamasine, Lucas recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 6-2 6-3). During the match Miedler scored 85 points vs Lamasine’s 73. Miedler was very aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Talking about serving, Miedler scored 4 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Lucas Miedler lost the serve 3 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Miedler put 66% of his first serves in, winning 67% (35/52) of the points behind his 1st serve and 56% (15/27) on the 2nd serve. Miedler broke Lamasine 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Miedler’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M25 Loule.
Lucas has a composed 9-4 win-loss record in 2022, 3-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Hsin Tseng | Miedler |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 69 |
| Pts | 79-68 | 236-204 |
| Total Points | 147 | 440 |
| Winners | 30 | 102 |
| %Winners | 38% | 43% |
Hsin Tseng played 1 match while Miedler competed in 3 matches. Miedler started his run from the qualifications while Hsin Tseng had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Lucas Miedler surrendered 1 set while Chun Hsin Tseng hasn’t conceded a set so far. Hsin Tseng has played 5 set(s) less than Miedler (2 vs 7). Therefore, Hsin Tseng played 49 games less than Miedler. The Chinese scored 30 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Lucas made 102 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Hsin Tseng | Miedler |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 14 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 4.7 |
| 1st in | 43/70 | 147/222 |
| %1st in | 61% | 66% |
| 1st pts | 30/43 | 102/147 |
| %1st pts | 70% | 69% |
| 2nd pts | 12/27 | 42/75 |
| %2nd pts | 44% | 56% |
Hsin Tseng didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Miedler bagged 14 aces (4.7 per match). Hsin Tseng won 70% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 44% of the points. On the other side, Miedler won 69% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Hsin Tseng | Miedler |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 10 |
| Converted | 4/9 | 10/21 |
| % Converted | 44% | 48% |
| Conceded | 6 | 14 |
| Saved | 4 | 9 |
| % Saved | 67% | 64% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 5 |
Chun broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Chun lost his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. The Austrian broke his opponents 10 times with a 48% conversion rate. Lucas conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 64% of the break points that he conceded.
| Hsin Tseng | |||
| R1 Moro Canas |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 79-68 | 79-68 | |
| Total points | 147 | 147 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 43/70 | 43/70 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 30/43 | 30/43 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/27 | 12/27 | |
| % 2nd pts | 44% | 44% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Miedler | |||||
| Q1 Molleker |
Q3 Fanselow |
R1 Lamasine |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 7-63 | 6-4 6-3 | 2-6 6-2 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 19 | 25 | 69 | |
| pts | 88-80 | 63-51 | 85-73 | 236-204 | |
| Total points | 168 | 114 | 158 | 440 | |
| Winners | 40 | 27 | 35 | 102 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 43% | 41% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | 4 | 14 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 63/90 | 32/53 | 52/79 | 147/222 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 60% | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 40/63 | 27/32 | 35/52 | 102/147 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 84% | 67% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/27 | 11/21 | 15/27 | 42/75 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 52% | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | 4 | 10 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/6 | 4/9 | 10/21 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | 44% | 48% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 2 | 6 | 14 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 2/2 | 3/6 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 100% | 50% | 217% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWWLLWW
LWW Tennis Scores in Prague 1 Challenger
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Jurij RodionovRodionov (6-1 7-66) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tomas MachacMachac – Evan FurnessFurness (3-6 7-65 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Lukas RosolRosol – Mats MoraingMoraing (4-6 6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jonas ForejtekForejtek – Daniel AltmaierAltmaier (6-1 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino – Emilio NavaNava (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Javier Barranco CosanoBarranco Cosano – Dennis NovakNovak (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng – Lucas MiedlerMiedler (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oleksii KrutykhKrutykh – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas MachacMachac – Lukas RosolRosol (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jonas ForejtekForejtek – Sebastian OfnerOfner (0-1) – H2H and prediction
