Yunseong Chung and Christian Langmo will face off in the qualifications of the Tallahassee Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:30 pm on COURT 5. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Yunseong Chung who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Yunseong Chung is the pick to win this match.
Yunseong Chung -> 1.72
Christian Langmo -> 2.00
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Yunseong Chung vs. Christian Langmo
There is no head to head record between Yunseong Chung and Christian Langmo since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Yunseong Chung
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 10-9 | 10-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 30-22 | 20-16 | 5-4 | 3-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 34-25 | 23-17 | 7-4 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 28-15 | 21-10 | 5-4 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 3-6 | 1-2 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 370, the Korean reached the qualifications after defeating John Mcnally 6-3 6-4.
In the qualifications, Chung had a good straight sets win against Mcnally (6-3 6-4). During the match, Chung scored 67 points vs Mcnally’s 53. Yunseong was exceptionally aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Regarding the service games, Chung struck 4 aces and he was exceptionally solid in conceding no double faults. Overall, Yunseong Chung was quite efficient on serve to win 75% (27/36) of his 1st serve and 65% (15/23) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Korean broke Mcnally 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Chung has a winning match record in the last 9 years having won 58% of his matches (221-158). 1-0 on clay in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Chung has a compiled30-21 record in the last 9 years on clay.
The Korean’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M25 Monastir.
The Korean has a compiled 10-6 win-loss record in 2022, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tallahassee Challenger
The Korean has never competed in this tournament before.
Christian Langmo
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 12-13 | 9-9 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 36-31 | 30-23 | 5-6 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-24 | 15-16 | 9-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 49-25 | 40-19 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 9-9 | 9-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 470, the American reached the qualifications after beating Zachary Svajda 7-5 6-0.
In the qualifications, Christian had a good straight sets win against Svajda (7-5 6-0). During the match Langmo scored 64 points vs Svajda’s 33. Christian was pretty aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Talking about serving, Langmo blasted 12 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Christian Langmo was very effective on serve to win 81% (22/27) of his 1st serve and 75% (15/20) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Christian broke Svajda 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
Christian has an overall 5-7 win-loss record in 2022, 1-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Chung | Langmo |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 18 |
| Pts | 67-53 | 64-33 |
| Total Points | 120 | 97 |
| Winners | 27 | 22 |
| %Winners | 40% | 34% |
Both Chung and Langmo played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Chung and Langmo have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Chung played 1 game more than Langmo. Chung scored 27 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, Christian blasted 22 winners (34%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Chung | Langmo |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 12 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 12 |
| 1st in | 36/59 | 27/47 |
| %1st in | 61% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 27/36 | 22/27 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 81% |
| 2nd pts | 15/23 | 15/20 |
| %2nd pts | 65% | 75% |
Chung blasted 4 aces . Langmo recorded 12 aces . Chung won 75% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 65% of the points. On the other side, Langmo won 81% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 75% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Chung | Langmo |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 5 |
| Converted | 3/5 | 5/7 |
| % Converted | 60% | 71% |
| Conceded | 8 | 2 |
| Saved | 7 | 1 |
| % Saved | 88% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Yunseong broke his opponent 3 times with a 60% conversion rate. Chung conceded his serve once and he saved 88% of the break points that he conceded. Christian broke his opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. Langmo conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Chung | |||
| Q1 Mcnally |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 67-53 | 67-53 | |
| Total points | 120 | 120 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 36/59 | 36/59 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 27/36 | 27/36 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/23 | 15/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 65% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/5 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 7/8 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 88% | 88% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Langmo | |||
| Q1 Svajda |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 64-33 | 64-33 | |
| Total points | 97 | 97 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 12 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 27/47 | 27/47 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 22/27 | 22/27 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/20 | 15/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 75% | 75% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWLWWLW
LLWLWLLWWL
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Daniel Dutra Da SilvaDutra Da Silva – Matias Franco DescotteFranco Descotte (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Gonzalo LamaLama – Tennys SandgrenSandgren (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christian HarrisonHarrison – Prajnesh GunneswaranGunneswaran (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan – Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jonathan MridhaMridha – Donald YoungYoung (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard – Andrew HarrisHarris (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Zhizhen ZhangZhang – Steve JohnsonJohnson (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan – Andrea CollariniCollarini (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael MmohMmoh – Sumit NagalNagal (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yunseong ChungChung – Christian LangmoLangmo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex RybakovRybakov – Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Antoine Cornut-ChauvincCornut-Chauvinc (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gijs BrouwerBrouwer – Cristian RodriguezRodriguez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – Jason JungJung (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
