Lucas Miedler and Sebastian Fanselow will face off in the qualifications of the Prague 1 Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 10:30 am on COURT 2. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Lucas Miedler who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Lucas Miedler is the pick to win this match.
Lucas Miedler -> 1.61
Sebastian Fanselow -> 2.26
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Lucas Miedler vs. Sebastian Fanselow
This will be the 2nd time that Lucas Miedler and Sebastian Fanselow fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Fanselow (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on clay.
The last time that they played, Fanselow won 6-4 6-1 in the 2nd round in the Fairfield Challenger back in 2018.
Lucas Miedler
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 22-22 | 4-1 | 16-14 | 2-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 35-32 | 13-6 | 14-18 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
| 2020 | 14-17 | 2-3 | 10-7 | 0-6 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 307, Miedler reached the qualifications after defeating Rudolf Molleker 7-5 7-63.
In the qualifications, Lucas had a good straight sets win against Molleker (7-5 7-63). During the match, Miedler scored 88 points vs Molleker’s 80. Miedler was pretty aggressive to blast 40 winners.
Talking about the service games, Miedler fired 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Lucas Miedler lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Miedler put 70% of his first serves in, winning 63% (40/63) of the points behind his 1st serve and 59% (16/27) on the 2nd serve. The Austrian broke Molleker 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Miedler has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 61% of his matches (319-201). 1-1 on clay in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Miedler has a compiled 90-79 match record in the last years on clay.
The Austrian’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M25 Loule.
Lucas has an aggregate 7-4 win-loss record in 2022, 1-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Prague 1 Challenger
Lucas has never competed in this tournament before.
Sebastian Fanselow
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 15-13 | 7-8 | 0-0 | 8-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 56-31 | 24-9 | 20-15 | 12-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 27-31 | 5-11 | 17-13 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 35-28 | 17-13 | 13-11 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 34-15 | 34-13 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 403, Fanselow got to the qualifications after beating Alexander Erler 6-1 7-5.
In the qualifications, Fanselow had a good straight sets win against Erler (6-1 7-5). During the match Fanselow scored 73 points vs Erler’s 58. The German was extremely aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about serving, Fanselow blasted 2 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Sebastian Fanselow lost the serve 3 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Fanselow put 63% of his first serves in, winning 64% (27/42) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (11/25) on the 2nd serve. Sebastian broke Erler 6 times after converting 50% of his break points (6/12).
The German has an overall 10-10 win-loss record in 2022, 1-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Miedler | Fanselow |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 25 | 19 |
| Pts | 88-80 | 73-58 |
| Total Points | 168 | 131 |
| Winners | 40 | 27 |
| %Winners | 45% | 37% |
Both Miedler and Fanselow played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Miedler and Fanselow have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Miedler played 6 games more than Fanselow. The Austrian scored 40 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, The German blasted 27 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Miedler | Fanselow |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 2 |
| 1st in | 63/90 | 42/67 |
| %1st in | 70% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 40/63 | 27/42 |
| %1st pts | 63% | 64% |
| 2nd pts | 16/27 | 11/25 |
| %2nd pts | 59% | 44% |
Miedler managed to score 5 aces . Fanselow bagged 2 aces . Miedler won 63% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Fanselow won 64% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 44% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Miedler | Fanselow |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 6 |
| Converted | 3/6 | 6/12 |
| % Converted | 50% | 50% |
| Conceded | 6 | 7 |
| Saved | 4 | 4 |
| % Saved | 67% | 57% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 3 |
Lucas broke his opponent 3 times with a 50% conversion rate. Miedler surrendered his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. The German broke his opponent 6 times with a 50% conversion rate. Fanselow conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 57% of the break points that he conceded.
| Miedler | |||
| Q1 Molleker |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 25 | |
| pts | 88-80 | 88-80 | |
| Total points | 168 | 168 | |
| Winners | 40 | 40 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 63/90 | 63/90 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 40/63 | 40/63 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 63% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/27 | 16/27 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/6 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Fanselow | |||
| Q1 Erler |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 73-58 | 73-58 | |
| Total points | 131 | 131 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 42/67 | 42/67 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 27/42 | 27/42 | |
| % 1st pts | 64% | 64% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/25 | 11/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 44% | 44% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/12 | 6/12 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 4/7 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 57% | 57% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LWW
LLLWWWWLWW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Tobias KamkeKamke – Evgeny TyurnevTyurnev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lukas RosolRosol – Filip HoranskyHoransky (3-2) – H2H and prediction
- Matthias BachingerBachinger – Alejandro Moro CanasMoro Canas (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Robin HaaseHaase – Jurij RodionovRodionov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino – Ryan PenistonPeniston (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sanjar FayzievFayziev – Emilio NavaNava (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Joao DominguesDomingues – Javier Barranco CosanoBarranco Cosano (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy – Dennis NovakNovak (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Mats MoraingMoraing (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Lucas MiedlerMiedler – Sebastian FanselowFanselow (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Constant LestienneLestienne (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – Martin KrumichKrumich (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan FurnessFurness – Alexandre MullerMuller (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oleksii KrutykhKrutykh – Andrew PaulsonPaulson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas MachacMachac – Michael VrbenskyVrbensky (1-0) – H2H and prediction
