Botic Van De Zandschulp and Vit Kopriva will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Grand Prix Hassan II for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 4:00 pm on CENTRE COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Botic Van De Zandschulp who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Botic Van De Zandschulp is the pick to win this match.
Botic Van De Zandschulp -> 1.38
Vit Kopriva -> 3.15
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Botic Van De Zandschulp vs. Vit Kopriva
There is no head to head record between Botic Van De Zandschulp and Vit Kopriva since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Botic Van De Zandschulp
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 29-32 | 13-11 | 11-10 | 4-9 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 33-33 | 9-11 | 16-12 | 7-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-25 | 10-9 | 4-6 | 12-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-29 | 14-11 | 11-7 | 7-7 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 53-23 | 17-5 | 24-10 | 9-5 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 43, Botic reached the 2nd round after beating Hugo Dellien 6-3 3-6 6-4.
In the 1st round, Botic defeated Dellien (6-3 3-6 6-4). During the match, Van De Zandschulp scored 98 points vs Dellien’s 91. Botic was exceptionally aggressive to blast 48 winners.
Regarding the service games, Van De Zandschulp fired 2 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Botic Van De Zandschulp lost the serve 3 times and he saved 10 break points. Furthermore, Van De Zandschulp put 73% of his first serves in, winning 65% (48/74) of the points behind his 1st serve and 54% (15/28) on the 2nd serve. The Dutch broke Dellien 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Van De Zandschulp has a solid record in the last 8 years having won 67% of his matches (258-127). 2-0 on clay in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Van De Zandschulp has an overall131-69 record in the last 8 years on clay.
The Dutch has a composed 10-7 win-loss record in 2022, 2-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Marrakech
The Dutch has never competed in this tournament before.
Vit Kopriva
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 42-30 | 12-10 | 25-13 | 4-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 39-27 | 13-9 | 21-16 | 2-1 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 35-27 | 1-4 | 34-21 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 39-28 | 7-5 | 30-18 | 1-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 36-26 | 1-3 | 32-21 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 165, Kopriva reached the 2nd round after defeating Matteo Viola 6-4 6-3 and Bernabe Zapata Miralles 6-1 6-4.
In the 1st round, Vit had a good straight sets win against Zapata Miralles (6-1 6-4). During the match Kopriva scored 91 points vs Zapata Miralles’s 86. The Czech was quite aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about serving, Kopriva scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 6 double faults. Vit Kopriva lost the serve 6 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Kopriva put 63% of his first serves in, winning 58% (29/50) of the points behind his 1st serve and 38% (11/29) on the 2nd serve. The Czech broke Zapata Miralles 7 times after converting 41% of his break points (7/17).
Kopriva has a composed 14-9 win-loss record in 2022, 7-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Van De Zandschulp | Kopriva |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 28 | 61 |
| Pts | 98-91 | 252-224 |
| Total Points | 189 | 476 |
| Winners | 48 | 83 |
| %Winners | 49% | 33% |
Van De Zandschulp played 1 match while Kopriva competed in 3 matches. Kopriva started his run from the qualifications while Van De Zandschulp had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Botic Van De Zandschulp surrendered 1 set, while Vit Kopriva lost 1 set. Van De Zandschulp has played 4 set(s) less than Kopriva (3 vs 7). Therefore, Van De Zandschulp played 33 games less than Kopriva. Botic scored 48 winners (49% of the total points). On the other side, Vit managed to score 83 winners (33%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Van De Zandschulp | Kopriva |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 1.3 |
| 1st in | 74/102 | 147/226 |
| %1st in | 73% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 48/74 | 83/147 |
| %1st pts | 65% | 56% |
| 2nd pts | 15/28 | 33/79 |
| %2nd pts | 54% | 42% |
Van De Zandschulp bagged 2 aces . Kopriva fired 4 aces (1.3 per match). Van De Zandschulp won 65% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, Kopriva won 56% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 42% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Van De Zandschulp | Kopriva |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 21 |
| Converted | 4/8 | 21/42 |
| % Converted | 50% | 50% |
| Conceded | 13 | 30 |
| Saved | 10 | 14 |
| % Saved | 77% | 47% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 16 |
Van De Zandschulp broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Dutch conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 77% of the break points that he conceded. Kopriva broke his opponents 21 times with a 50% conversion rate. Kopriva conceded his serve 16 times and he saved 47% of the break points that he conceded.
| Van De Zandschulp | |||
| R1 Dellien |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 3-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
| pts | 98-91 | 98-91 | |
| Total points | 189 | 189 | |
| Winners | 48 | 48 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 74/102 | 74/102 | |
| % 1st in | 73% | 73% | |
| 1st pts | 48/74 | 48/74 | |
| % 1st pts | 65% | 65% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/28 | 15/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 13 | 13 | |
| Saved | 10/13 | 10 | |
| Saved % | 77% | 77% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Kopriva | |||||
| Q1 Viola |
Q3 Zapata Miralles |
R1 Zapata Miralles |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | 0-6 6-1 7-5 | 6-1 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 25 | 17 | 61 | |
| pts | 70-52 | 91-86 | 91-86 | 252-224 | |
| Total points | 122 | 177 | 177 | 476 | |
| Winners | 25 | 29 | 29 | 83 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 32% | 32% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 6 | 6 | 16 | |
| 1st in | 47/68 | 50/79 | 50/79 | 147/226 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 63% | 63% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 25/47 | 29/50 | 29/50 | 83/147 | |
| % 1st pts | 53% | 58% | 58% | 56% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/21 | 11/29 | 11/29 | 33/79 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 38% | 38% | 42% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 7 | 7 | 7 | 21 | |
| Converted | 7/8 | 7/17 | 7/17 | 21/42 | |
| Converted % | 88% | 41% | 41% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 11 | 11 | 30 | |
| Saved | 4/8 | 5/11 | 5/11 | 14 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 45% | 45% | 140% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 6 | 6 | 16 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLWLWLWL
LWWLWLWLLL Tennis Scores in Marrakech
- Lorenzo MusettiMusetti – Carlos TabernerTaberner (6-1 6-73 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Laslo DjereDjere – Malek JaziriJaziri (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Richard GasquetGasquet – Pavel KotovKotov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- David GoffinGoffin – Pablo AndujarAndujar (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Joao SousaSousa – Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena (2-3) – H2H and prediction
- Federico CoriaCoria – Mirza BasicBasic (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Felix Auger AliassimeAuger Aliassime – Alex MolcanMolcan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo MusettiMusetti – Laslo DjereDjere (1-3) – H2H and prediction
