Holger Vitus Nodskov Rune and Nerman Fatic will face off in the 2nd round of the Sanremo Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 4:30 pm on CENTER COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Holger Vitus Nodskov Rune who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Holger Vitus Nodskov Rune is the pick to win this match.
Holger Vitus Nodskov Rune -> 1.24
Nerman Fatic -> 4.05
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Holger Vitus Nodskov Rune vs. Nerman Fatic
There is no head to head record between Holger Vitus Nodskov Rune and Nerman Fatic since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Holger Vitus Nodskov Rune
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|
Ranked no. 91, the Dane reached the 2nd round after defeating Evgenii Tiurnev 6-3 7-612.
In the 1st round, The Dane had a good straight sets win against Tyurnev (6-3 7-612). During the match, Vitus Nodskov Rune scored 83 points vs Tyurnev’s 77. Holger was exceptionally aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Talking about the service games, Vitus Nodskov Rune bagged 2 aces and he was quite steady in conceding no double faults. Holger Vitus Nodskov Rune conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 4 break points. Furthermore, Vitus Nodskov Rune put 69% of his first serves in, winning 66% (37/56) of the points behind his 1st serve and 64% (16/25) on the 2nd serve. Holger broke Tyurnev twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
Vitus Nodskov Rune has a solid win-loss record in the last 5 years having won 65% of his matches (119-64). 1-3 on clay in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Vitus Nodskov Rune has an overall75-37 match record in the last 5 years on clay.
Vitus Nodskov Rune has an aggregate 7-9 win-loss record in 2022, 1-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Sanremo Challenger
Vitus Nodskov Rune has never competed in this tournament before.
Nerman Fatic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6-11 | 3-3 | 2-8 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-28 | 0-1 | 35-25 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 34-27 | 0-1 | 31-19 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2021 | 37-26 | 1-1 | 30-22 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 11-3 | 0-0 | 9-1 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 285, the Bosnian reached the 2nd round after beating Giulio Zeppieri 6-4 6-2.
In the 1st round, Fatic had a good straight sets win against Zeppieri (6-4 6-2). During the match Fatic scored 68 points vs Zeppieri’s 54. Fatic was very aggressive to blast 30 winners.
About the serving games, Fatic blasted 2 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Nerman Fatic was pretty efficient on serve to win 71% (30/42) of his 1st serve and 63% (12/19) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Nerman broke Zeppieri 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
Fatic’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M25 Antalya.
The Bosnian has a compiled 11-7 win-loss record in 2022, 11-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Vitus Nodskov Rune | Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 22 | 18 |
| Pts | 83-77 | 68-54 |
| Total Points | 160 | 122 |
| Winners | 37 | 30 |
| %Winners | 45% | 44% |
Both Vitus Nodskov Rune and Fatic played 1 match. Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Vitus Nodskov Rune and Fatic have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Vitus Nodskov Rune played 4 games more than Fatic. Holger scored 37 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, Nerman fired 30 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Vitus Nodskov Rune | Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 2 |
| 1st in | 56/81 | 42/61 |
| %1st in | 69% | 69% |
| 1st pts | 37/56 | 30/42 |
| %1st pts | 66% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 16/25 | 12/19 |
| %2nd pts | 64% | 63% |
Vitus Nodskov Rune recorded 2 aces . Fatic managed to score 2 aces . Vitus Nodskov Rune won 66% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 64% of the points. On the other side, Fatic won 71% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Vitus Nodskov Rune | Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 3 |
| Converted | 2/5 | 3/9 |
| % Converted | 40% | 33% |
| Conceded | 4 | 3 |
| Saved | 4 | 3 |
| % Saved | 100% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Holger broke his opponent twice with a 40% conversion rate. The Dane quite strong on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 4 break points. Nerman broke his opponent 3 times with a 33% conversion rate. Nerman was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 3 break points.
| Vitus Nodskov Rune | |||
| R1 Tyurnev |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-612 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 83-77 | 83-77 | |
| Total points | 160 | 160 | |
| Winners | 37 | 37 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 56/81 | 56/81 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 37/56 | 37/56 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/25 | 16/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 64% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/5 | 2/5 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 4/4 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Fatic | |||
| R1 Zeppieri |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 68-54 | 68-54 | |
| Total points | 122 | 122 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 42/61 | 42/61 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 30/42 | 30/42 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/19 | 12/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/9 | 3/9 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Sanremo Challenger
- Mate ValkuszValkusz – Matteo DonatiDonati (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Riccardo BonadioBonadio – Matteo ArnaldiArnaldi (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Miljan ZekicZekic – Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert (4-6 6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Alexandre MullerMuller – Lucas MiedlerMiedler (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – Edoardo LavagnoLavagno (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Alexey VatutinVatutin – Robin HaaseHaase (7-5 2-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – Borna GojoGojo (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Thomas FabbianoFabbiano – Jelle SelsSels (7-5 1-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy – Valentin VacherotVacherot (6-1 6-75 7-62) – See score progression
- Radu AlbotAlbot – Khumoun SultanovSultanov (6-2 3-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Matteo MartineauMartineau – Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux (6-3 4-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Flavio Cobolli/Matteo GiganteCobolli/Matteo Gigante – Karol Drzewiecki/Piotr MatuszewskiDrzewiecki/Piotr Matuszewski (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Nerman FaticFatic – Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Holger Vitus Nodskov RuneVitus Nodskov Rune – Evgenii TiurnevTiurnev (6-3 7-612) – See score progression
- Gianluca MagerMager – Francesco FortiForti (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Andrea ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Hugo GrenierGrenier (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Matteo GiganteGigante – Flavio CobolliCobolli (2-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Riccardo BonadioBonadio – Matteo ArnaldiArnaldi (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy – Valentin VacherotVacherot (6-1 6-7(5) 7-6(2)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Thomas FabbianoFabbiano – Vitaliy SachkoSachko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Miljan ZekicZekic – Alexey VatutinVatutin (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Riccardo BonadioBonadio – Andrea ArnaboldiArnaboldi (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy – Gianluca MagerMager (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexandre MullerMuller – Francesco PassaroPassaro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Matteo MartineauMartineau – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mate ValkuszValkusz – Radu AlbotAlbot (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Holger Vitus Nodskov RuneVitus Nodskov Rune – Nerman FaticFatic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
