Taylor Harry Fritz and Miomir Kecmanovic will clash against each other in the 4th round of the Miami Open for the 4th time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Tuesday at 9:00 pm on STADIUM. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Taylor Harry Fritz who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Taylor Harry Fritz is the pick to win this match.
Taylor Harry Fritz -> 1.57
Miomir Kecmanovic -> 2.37
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Taylor Harry Fritz vs. Miomir Kecmanovic
This will be the 4th time that Taylor Harry Fritz and Miomir Kecmanovic square off. The head to head is 3-0 for Fritz (see full H2H stats), 3-0 on hard.
The last time that they played each other, Fritz won 7-6(5) 3-6 6-1 in the quarter in Indian wells back in March 2022.
Highlights Taylor Harry Fritz vs Miomir Kecmanovic – Indian wells 18-March-2022
Taylor Harry Fritz
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|
Ranked no. 13 (career-high), Taylor reached the 4th round after defeating Mikhail Kukushkin 6-3 5-7 6-3 and Tommy Paul 7-62 6-4.
In the 3rd round, Fritz had a good straight sets win against Paul (7-62 6-4). During the match, Fritz scored 76 points vs Paul’s 60. Fritz was quite aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about the service games, Fritz scored 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Taylor Harry Fritz was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 81% (30/37) of his 1st serve and 67% (20/30) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Fritz was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Paul twice.
Overall Performance in this tournament
Fritz has conceded 1 set in this tournament to win 56% of the points he played.
Fritz has a solid win-loss record in the last 9 years having won 60% of his matches (268-176). 14-3 on hard in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Fritz has an overall168-95 match record in the last 9 years on hard.
His best result of the year was conquering the title in in Indian Wells where he overcame Rafael Nadal in the final 6-3 7-6(5).
Fritz has an aggregate 16-4 win-loss record in 2022, 14-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Miami
Miomir Kecmanovic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 22-26 | 10-15 | 6-7 | 2-0 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 28-31 | 11-13 | 9-9 | 6-5 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 40-26 | 21-11 | 15-8 | 2-4 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 17-27 | 6-11 | 5-8 | 5-6 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 18-13 | 7-6 | 5-2 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 48, Miomir got to the 4th round after defeating Jack Sock 7-63 6-4, Felix Auger Aliassime 6-4 6-2 and Sebastian Korda 7-64 6-3.
In the 3rd round, Kecmanovic had a good straight sets win against Korda (7-64 6-3). During the match Kecmanovic scored 74 points vs Korda’s 62. Kecmanovic was quite aggressive to blast 39 winners.
About the serving games, Kecmanovic fired 4 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Miomir Kecmanovic lost the serve once and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Kecmanovic put 69% of his first serves in, winning 80% (39/49) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (11/22) on the 2nd serve. Miomir broke Korda twice after converting 29% of his break points (2/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Miomir hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 56% of the points he played.
Kecmanovic has a composed 18-6 win-loss record in 2022, 11-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Miami
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2019 and 2021. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Fritz | Kecmanovic |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 53 | 63 |
| Pts | 169-134 | 220-172 |
| Total Points | 303 | 392 |
| Winners | 71 | 94 |
| %Winners | 42% | 43% |
Fritz played 2 matches while Kecmanovic competed in 3 matches. At the moment, Taylor Harry Fritz surrendered 1 set while Miomir Kecmanovic hasn’t lost a set so far. Fritz has played 1 set(s) less than Kecmanovic (5 vs 6). Therefore, Fritz played 10 games less than Kecmanovic. The American scored 71 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, The Serbian recorded 94 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Fritz | Kecmanovic |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 14 | 13 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 4.3 |
| 1st in | 85/142 | 122/199 |
| %1st in | 60% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 71/85 | 94/122 |
| %1st pts | 84% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 36/57 | 49/77 |
| %2nd pts | 63% | 64% |
Fritz blasted 14 aces (7 per match). Kecmanovic managed to score 13 aces (4.3 per match). Fritz won 84% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 63% of the points. On the other side, Kecmanovic won 77% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 64% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Fritz | Kecmanovic |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 7 |
| Converted | 5/13 | 7/18 |
| % Converted | 38% | 39% |
| Conceded | 4 | 12 |
| Saved | 2 | 10 |
| % Saved | 50% | 83% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Taylor broke his opponents 5 times with a 38% conversion rate. Fritz surrendered his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Kecmanovic broke his opponents 7 times with a 39% conversion rate. Miomir conceded his serve twice and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded.
| Fritz | ||||
| R2 Kukushkin |
R3 Paul |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 5-7 6-3 | 7-62 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 23 | 53 | |
| pts | 93-74 | 76-60 | 169-134 | |
| Total points | 167 | 136 | 303 | |
| Winners | 41 | 30 | 71 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 39% | 42% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 10 | 4 | 14 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 48/75 | 37/67 | 85/142 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 55% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 41/48 | 30/37 | 71/85 | |
| % 1st pts | 85% | 81% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/27 | 20/30 | 36/57 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 67% | 63% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Converted | 3/11 | 2/2 | 5/13 | |
| Converted % | 27% | 100% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 67% | 34% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| Kecmanovic | |||||
| R1 Sock |
R2 Auger-Aliassime |
R3 Korda |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-63 6-4 | 6-4 6-2 | 7-64 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 18 | 22 | 63 | |
| pts | 76-63 | 70-47 | 74-62 | 220-172 | |
| Total points | 139 | 117 | 136 | 392 | |
| Winners | 30 | 25 | 39 | 94 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 36% | 53% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 5 | 4 | 4 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 40/69 | 33/59 | 49/71 | 122/199 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 56% | 69% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 30/40 | 25/33 | 39/49 | 94/122 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 76% | 80% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/29 | 18/26 | 11/22 | 49/77 | |
| % 2nd pts | 69% | 69% | 50% | 64% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| Converted | 2/5 | 3/6 | 2/7 | 7/18 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 50% | 29% | 39% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 5 | 3 | 12 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 5/5 | 2/3 | 10 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 100% | 67% | 121% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Miami
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka (7-65 4-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Daniil MedvedevMedvedev – Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Hubert HurkaczHurkacz – Aslan KaratsevKaratsev (7-5 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Stefanos TsitsipasTsitsipas – Alex De MinaurDe Minaur (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic – Sebastian KordaKorda (7-64 6-3) – See score progression
- Taylor Harry FritzHarry Fritz – Tommy PaulPaul (7-62 6-4) – See score progression
- Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby – Roberto Bautista AgutBautista Agut (6-3 5-7 6-4) – See score progression
- Carlos AlcarazAlcaraz – Marin CilicCilic (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Frances TiafoeTiafoe – Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Francisco CerundoloCerundolo – Gael MonfilsMonfils (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Jannik SinnerSinner – Pablo Carreno-BustaCarreno-Busta (5-7 7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Alexander ZverevZverev – Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Nick KyrgiosKyrgios – Fabio FogniniFognini (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis – Denis KudlaKudla (7-65 4-6 7-64) – See score progression
- Cameron NorrieNorrie – Hugo GastonGaston (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Casper RuudRuud – Alexander BublikBublik (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka (7-6(5) 4-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Stefanos TsitsipasTsitsipas – Alex De MinaurDe Minaur (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Carlos AlcarazAlcaraz – Marin CilicCilic (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Taylor Harry FritzHarry Fritz – Tommy PaulPaul (7-6(2) 6-4) – See score progression
- Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic – Sebastian KordaKorda (7-6(4) 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis – Alexander ZverevZverev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nick KyrgiosKyrgios – Jannik SinnerSinner (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniil MedvedevMedvedev – Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Taylor Harry FritzHarry Fritz – Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefanos TsitsipasTsitsipas – Carlos Alcaraz GarfiaAlcaraz Garfia (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Casper RuudRuud – Cameron NorrieNorrie (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Hubert HurkaczHurkacz (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francisco CerundoloCerundolo – Frances TiafoeTiafoe (0-0) – H2H and prediction
