Borna Gojo and Marek Gengel will face off in the 2nd round of the Biel Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 4:00 pm on COURT 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Borna Gojo who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Borna Gojo is the pick to win this match.
Borna Gojo -> 1.22
Marek Gengel -> 4.3
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Borna Gojo vs. Marek Gengel
There is no head to head record between Borna Gojo and Marek Gengel since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Borna Gojo
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 10-8 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 9-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 43-25 | 22-9 | 12-7 | 6-5 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 40-28 | 19-9 | 5-5 | 14-10 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 21-22 | 8-7 | 3-6 | 7-6 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 23-14 | 11-6 | 10-6 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 234, the Croatian reached the 2nd round after beating Pierre-Hugues Herbert 6-70 6-3 6-3.
In the 1st round against Herbert, Borna recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-70 6-3 6-3). During the match, Gojo scored 107 points vs Herbert’s 94. Gojo was extremely aggressive to blast 48 winners.
Talking about the service games, Gojo made 3 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Borna Gojo lost the serve once and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Gojo put 69% of his first serves in, winning 80% (48/60) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (13/27) on the 2nd serve. Gojo broke Herbert 4 times after converting 27% of his break points (4/15).
Gojo has a winning match record in the last 7 years having won 59% of his matches (158-109). 5-2 on indoor hard courts in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Gojo has a compiled27-21 match record in the last 7 years on indoor hard courts.
The Croatian’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in the Bengalaru 1 Challenger.
Gojo has an overall 14-5 win-loss record in 2022, 5-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Biel Challenger
Marek Gengel
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 68-25 | 65-21 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 16-27 | 14-15 | 0-7 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 42-29 | 28-16 | 4-8 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 52-28 | 47-14 | 3-8 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 20-17 | 16-12 | 2-2 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 431, the Czech reached the 2nd round after defeating Yunseong Chung 3-6 6-4 6-3, Dan Added 6-1 6-71 6-4 and Ruben Bemelmans 7-64 7-63.
In the 1st round, Marek had a good straight sets win against Bemelmans (7-64 7-63). During the match Gengel scored 78 points vs Bemelmans’s 74. Marek was very aggressive to blast 44 winners.
About the serving games, Gengel scored 11 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Marek Gengel was quite effective on serve to win 77% (44/57) of his 1st serve and 58% (15/26) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Czech broke Bemelmans once after converting 50% of his break points (1/2).
The Czech’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M25 Sharm ElSheikh.
Gengel has an overall 11-6 win-loss record in 2022, 4-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Biel Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2021. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gojo | Gengel |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 31 | 84 |
| Pts | 107-94 | 260-249 |
| Total Points | 201 | 509 |
| Winners | 48 | 122 |
| %Winners | 45% | 47% |
Gojo played 1 match while Gengel competed in 3 matches. Gengel started his run from the qualifications while Gojo had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Borna Gojo lost 1 set, while Marek Gengel conceded 2 sets. Gojo has played 5 set(s) less than Gengel (3 vs 8). Therefore, Gojo played 53 games less than Gengel. Borna scored 48 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, The Czech fired 122 winners (47%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gojo | Gengel |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 23 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 7.7 |
| 1st in | 60/87 | 175/244 |
| %1st in | 69% | 72% |
| 1st pts | 48/60 | 122/175 |
| %1st pts | 80% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 13/27 | 37/69 |
| %2nd pts | 48% | 54% |
Gojo bagged 3 aces . Gengel scored 23 aces (7.7 per match). Gojo won 80% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 48% of the points. On the other side, Gengel won 70% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gojo | Gengel |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 12 |
| Converted | 4/15 | 12/27 |
| % Converted | 27% | 44% |
| Conceded | 2 | 15 |
| Saved | 1 | 8 |
| % Saved | 50% | 53% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 7 |
Borna broke his opponent 4 times with a 27% conversion rate. Gojo conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Marek broke his opponents 12 times with a 44% conversion rate. Gengel conceded his serve 7 times and he saved 53% of the break points that he conceded.
| Gojo | |||
| R1 Herbert |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-70 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 107-94 | 107-94 | |
| Total points | 201 | 201 | |
| Winners | 48 | 48 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 60/87 | 60/87 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 48/60 | 48/60 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/27 | 13/27 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/15 | 4/15 | |
| Converted % | 27% | 27% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Gengel | |||||
| Q1 Chung |
Q3 Added |
R1 Bemelmans |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-4 6-3 | 6-1 6-71 6-4 | 7-64 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 30 | 26 | 84 | |
| pts | 76-78 | 106-97 | 78-74 | 260-249 | |
| Total points | 154 | 203 | 152 | 509 | |
| Winners | 33 | 45 | 44 | 122 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 42% | 56% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 5 | 7 | 11 | 23 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 52/78 | 66/83 | 57/83 | 175/244 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 80% | 69% | 72% | |
| 1st pts | 33/52 | 45/66 | 44/57 | 122/175 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 68% | 77% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/26 | 7/17 | 15/26 | 37/69 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 41% | 58% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 6 | 1 | 12 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 6/18 | 1/2 | 12/27 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 33% | 50% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 5 | 2 | 15 | |
| Saved | 4/8 | 3/5 | 1/2 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 60% | 50% | 160% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 2 | 1 | 7 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWWWLLW
WWLWWLWWWW Tennis Scores in Biel Challenger
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – Marius CopilCopil (6-4 3-6 7-63) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Kacper ZukZuk – Pavel KotovKotov (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tim Van RijthovenVan Rijthoven – Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy (6-2 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Filip HoranskyHoransky – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Borna GojoGojo – Marek GengelGengel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Jelle SelsSels (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kacper ZukZuk – Antoine EscoffierEscoffier (0-1) – H2H and prediction
