Daniel Michalski and Mathieu Perchicot will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Zadar Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 10:00 am on COURT 3. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daniel Michalski who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Daniel Michalski is the pick to win this match.
Daniel Michalski -> 1.32
Mathieu Perchicot -> 3.26
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Daniel Michalski vs. Mathieu Perchicot
This will be the 2nd time that Daniel Michalski and Mathieu Perchicot square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Michalski (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they competed against each other, Michalski won 6-2 7-6(3) in the final in M15 Cairo back in 2019.
Daniel Michalski
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 39-26 | 1-6 | 36-19 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-25 | 4-6 | 36-18 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 51-24 | 0-0 | 51-24 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 47-25 | 0-3 | 47-20 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 13-10 | 7-3 | 4-5 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 337 (career-high), Daniel got to the qualifications after defeating Josip Simundza 6-2 6-1.
In the qualifications, The Pole had a good straight sets win against Simundza (6-2 6-1). During the match, Michalski scored 54 points vs Simundza’s 29. Michalski was extremely aggressive to blast 20 winners.
Talking about the service games, Michalski scored just 1 ace throughout the match and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Daniel Michalski was pretty effective on serve to win 77% (20/26) of his 1st serve and 62% (8/13) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Pole broke Simundza 6 times after converting 55% of his break points (6/11).
Michalski has a solid match record in the last 6 years having won 64% of his matches (126-71). 17-3 on clay in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Michalski has a composed100-49 record in the last 6 years on clay.
Daniel’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M15 Cairo.
Michalski has an overall 17-3 win-loss record in 2022, 17-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Zadar Challenger
The Pole has never competed in this tournament before.
Mathieu Perchicot
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 22-28 | 0-0 | 22-26 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 28-32 | 1-2 | 27-29 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 21-16 | 5-4 | 16-11 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 46-26 | 0-0 | 46-26 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2018 | 51-22 | 5-2 | 45-19 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 436, the French player got to the qualifications after beating Paul Valsecchi 6-2 6-2.
In the qualifications, Mathieu had a good straight sets win against Valsecchi (6-2 6-2). During the match Perchicot scored 64 points vs Valsecchi’s 42. The French player was exceptionally aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about serving, Perchicot scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 2 double faults. Mathieu Perchicot lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Perchicot put 76% of his first serves in, winning 67% (26/39) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (6/12) on the 2nd serve. Mathieu broke Valsecchi 6 times after converting 67% of his break points (6/9).
Perchicot’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in M15+H Bagnoles de l’Orne.
Perchicot has an overall 11-8 win-loss record in 2022, 11-7 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Michalski | Perchicot |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 15 | 16 |
| Pts | 54-29 | 64-42 |
| Total Points | 83 | 106 |
| Winners | 20 | 26 |
| %Winners | 37% | 41% |
Both Michalski and Perchicot played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Michalski and Perchicot have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Michalski played 1 game less than Perchicot. Daniel scored 20 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, The French player managed to score 26 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Michalski | Perchicot |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 1 |
| 1st in | 26/39 | 39/51 |
| %1st in | 67% | 76% |
| 1st pts | 20/26 | 26/39 |
| %1st pts | 77% | 67% |
| 2nd pts | 8/13 | 6/12 |
| %2nd pts | 62% | 50% |
Michalski managed to score 1 ace . Perchicot also scored 1 ace . Michalski won 77% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 62% of the points. On the other side, Perchicot won 67% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Michalski | Perchicot |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 6 |
| Converted | 6/11 | 6/9 |
| % Converted | 55% | 67% |
| Conceded | 3 | 5 |
| Saved | 2 | 3 |
| % Saved | 67% | 60% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 |
Daniel broke his opponent 6 times with a 55% conversion rate. The Pole dropped his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Perchicot broke his opponent 6 times with a 67% conversion rate. Perchicot conceded his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded.
| Michalski | |||
| Q1 Simundza |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 54-29 | 54-29 | |
| Total points | 83 | 83 | |
| Winners | 20 | 20 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 26/39 | 26/39 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 20/26 | 20/26 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/13 | 8/13 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/11 | 6/11 | |
| Converted % | 55% | 55% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Perchicot | |||
| Q1 Valsecchi |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 64-42 | 64-42 | |
| Total points | 106 | 106 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 39/51 | 39/51 | |
| % 1st in | 76% | 76% | |
| 1st pts | 26/39 | 26/39 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/12 | 6/12 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/9 | 6/9 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLWWWWWW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino – Zsombor PirosPiros (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Miljan ZekicZekic – Juan Pablo PazPablo Paz (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gianluca MagerMager – Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nerman FaticFatic – Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Eduard Esteve LobatoEsteve Lobato – Nikola MilojevicMilojevic (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Manuel GuinardGuinard – Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea VavassoriVavassori – Zhizhen ZhangZhang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Raul BrancaccioBrancaccio – Javier Barranco CosanoBarranco Cosano (3-5) – H2H and prediction
- Filip MisolicMisolic – Riccardo BalzeraniBalzerani (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cezar Cretu (ROU)Cretu (ROU) – Ergi KirkinKirkin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Frane NincevicNincevic – Carlos Sanchez JoverSanchez Jover (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel MichalskiMichalski – Mathieu PerchicotPerchicot (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic (0-2) – H2H and prediction
