Christina Mchale and Ashlyn Krueger will clash against each other in the qualifications of the BNP Paribas Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Tuesday at 5:00 pm on Stadium 3. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Christina Mchale who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Christina Mchale is the pick to win this match.
Christina Mchale -> 1.28
Ashlyn Krueger -> 3.50
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Christina Mchale vs. Ashlyn Krueger
There is no head to head record between Christina Mchale and Ashlyn Krueger since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Christina Mchale
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 16-18 | 11-13 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 8-22 | 3-11 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 13-11 | 11-8 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 38-26 | 25-16 | 8-4 | 2-1 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| 2018 | 16-30 | 11-20 | 3-7 | 1-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 168, the American got to the qualifications after defeating Jule Niemeier 3-6 7-5 6-4.
In the qualifications against Niemeier, Christina recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 7-5 6-4).During the match, Mchale scored less points (1) than Niemeier. In fact, the world no. 168 won 91 points vs Niemeier’s. That means that Mchale was more focused during the important points. Mchale was quite aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Regarding the service games, Mchale wasn’t able to score even 1 ace during the match and she committed only 4 double faults. Christina Mchale lost the serve 6 times and she saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Mchale put 70% of her first serves in, winning 58% (38/65) of the points behind her 1st serve and 43% (12/28) on the 2nd serve. Christina broke Niemeier 7 times after converting 70% of her break points (7/10).
Mchale has won exactly 50% of her matches (226-223) in the last 10 years. 8-6 on hard in 2022. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this competition, Mchale has a compiled 150-137 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
The American’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in the W60 Orlando.
The American has a compiled 8-6 win-loss record in 2022, 8-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Indian Wells
Ashlyn Krueger
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 10-11 | 7-9 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 44-26 | 26-15 | 8-6 | 2-2 | 8-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 34-22 | 23-17 | 10-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 15-14 | 10-11 | 5-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 542, Ashlyn got to the qualifications after beating Panna Udvardy 7-65 7-62.
In the qualifications, Krueger had a good straight sets win against Udvardy (7-65 7-62). During the match Krueger scored 100 points vs Udvardy’s 89. Krueger was very aggressive to blast 40 winners.
About the serving games, Krueger bagged 4 aces and she committed only 6 double faults. Ashlyn Krueger lost the serve 5 times and she saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Krueger put 66% of her first serves in, winning 66% (40/61) of the points behind her 1st serve and 31% (10/32) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Udvardy 5 times after converting 42% of her break points (5/12).
Ashlyn has a composed 4-4 win-loss record in 2022, 3-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Indian Wells
Previously, her best result was reaching the 1st round in 2021. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Mchale | Krueger |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 31 | 26 |
| Pts | 91-92 | 100-89 |
| Total Points | 183 | 189 |
| Winners | 38 | 40 |
| %Winners | 42% | 40% |
Both Mchale and Krueger played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Christina Mchale lost 1 set while Ashlyn Krueger hasn’t dropped a set so far. Mchale has played 1 set more than Krueger (3 vs 2). Therefore, Mchale played 5 games more than Krueger. The American scored 38 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, The American scored 40 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Mchale | Krueger |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 4 |
| 1st in | 65/93 | 61/93 |
| %1st in | 70% | 66% |
| 1st pts | 38/65 | 40/61 |
| %1st pts | 58% | 66% |
| 2nd pts | 12/28 | 10/32 |
| %2nd pts | 43% | 31% |
Mchale didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Krueger bagged 4 aces . Mchale won 58% points on her first serve. She pretty solid on her second serve to win 43% of the points. On the other side, Krueger won 66% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 31% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Mchale | Krueger |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 5 |
| Converted | 7/10 | 5/12 |
| % Converted | 70% | 42% |
| Conceded | 10 | 11 |
| Saved | 4 | 6 |
| % Saved | 40% | 55% |
| Times Broken | 6 | 5 |
Mchale broke her opponent 7 times with a 70% conversion rate. The American surrendered her serve 6 times and she saved 40% of the break points that she conceded. Ashlyn broke her opponent 5 times with a 42% conversion rate. Krueger conceded her serve 5 times and she saved 55% of the break points that she conceded.
| Mchale | |||
| Q1 Niemeier |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 7-5 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 91-92 | 91-92 | |
| Total points | 183 | 183 | |
| Winners | 38 | 38 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 65/93 | 65/93 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 38/65 | 38/65 | |
| % 1st pts | 58% | 58% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/28 | 12/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 43% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/10 | 7/10 | |
| Converted % | 70% | 70% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
| Saved | 4/10 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 40% | 40% | |
| Times Broken | 6 | 6 | |
| Krueger | |||
| Q1 Udvardy |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-65 7-62 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
| pts | 100-89 | 100-89 | |
| Total points | 189 | 189 | |
| Winners | 40 | 40 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 61/93 | 61/93 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 40/61 | 40/61 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/32 | 10/32 | |
| % 2nd pts | 31% | 31% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/12 | 5/12 | |
| Converted % | 42% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 11 | 11 | |
| Saved | 6/11 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 55% | 55% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWLLLWL Tennis Scores in Indian Wells
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Calvin HemeryHemery (6-2 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Leonardo MayerMayer – Paul-Henri MathieuMathieu (2-6 6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Arthur De GreefDe Greef – Tommy RobredoRobredo (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Federico DelbonisDelbonis – Stephane RobertRobert (6-2 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mai HontamaHontama – Heather WatsonWatson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marie BouzkovaBouzkova – Chloe PaquetPaquet (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kaja JuvanJuvan – Lesya TsurenkoTsurenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anna KalinskayaKalinskaya – Qiang WangWang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katie BoulterBoulter – Sara ErraniErrani (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Magdalena FrechFrech – Daria GavrilovaGavrilova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kirsten FlipkensFlipkens – Caty McNallyMcNally (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Astra SharmaSharma – Viktoriya TomovaTomova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Harmony TanTan – Aleksandra KrunicKrunic (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anastasia GasanovaGasanova – Harriet DartDart (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Lucia BronzettiBronzetti – Dalma GalfiGalfi (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ajla TomljanovicTomljanovic – Hailey BaptisteBaptiste (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ekaterina AlexandrovaAlexandrova – Elvina KalievaKalieva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dayana YastremskaYastremska – Caroline GarciaGarcia (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anna BondarBondar – Petra MarticMartic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ann LiLi – Madison BrengleBrengle (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Danka KovinicKovinic – Jil TeichmannTeichmann (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Clara BurelBurel – Anhelina KalininaKalinina (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Beatriz Haddad MaiaHaddad Maia – Sofia KeninKenin (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katie VolynetsVolynets – Arantxa RusRus (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Qinwen ZhengZheng – Vera ZvonarevaZvonareva (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ana KonjuhKonjuh – Alize CornetCornet (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Anastasia PotapovaPotapova – Misaki DoiDoi (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Amanda AnisimovaAnisimova – Emma NavarroNavarro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nuria Parrizas-DiazParrizas-Diaz – Shelby RogersRogers (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sloane StephensStephens – Naomi OsakaOsaka (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kristina KucovaKucova – Elena Gabriela RuseGabriela Ruse (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katerina SiniakovaSiniakova – Irina-Camelia BeguBegu (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Maria Camila Osorio SerranoCamila Osorio Serrano – Aliaksandra SasnovichSasnovich (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Marta KostyukKostyuk – Maryna ZanevskaZanevska (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Magda LinetteLinette – Andrea PetkovicPetkovic (0-1) – H2H and prediction
