Caty McNally and Kirsten Flipkens will clash against each other in the qualifications of the BNP Paribas Open for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Tuesday at 3:00 pm on Stadium 3. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Caty McNally who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Caty McNally is the pick to win this match.
Caty McNally -> 1.77
Kirsten Flipkens -> 2.05
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Caty McNally vs. Kirsten Flipkens
This will be the 2nd time that Caty McNally and Kirsten Flipkens play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Flipkens (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they fought against each other, Flipkens won 7-5 4-6 6-2 in the quarter in the Houston back in 2019.
Caty McNally
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 16-13 | 5-6 | 9-4 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 32-23 | 7-9 | 1-6 | 17-5 | 7-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 22-20 | 10-11 | 4-5 | 3-1 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 13-14 | 9-9 | 1-3 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 172, McNally got to the qualifications after beating Anna-Lena Friedsam 4-6 7-5 7-5.
In the qualifications against Friedsam, The American recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 7-5 7-5). During the match, McNally scored 129 points vs Friedsam’s 122. Caty was exceptionally aggressive to blast 45 winners.
Regarding the service games, McNally blasted 3 aces and she committed only 9 double faults. Caty McNally lost the serve 5 times and she saved 9 break points. Furthermore, McNally put 60% of her first serves in, winning 64% (45/70) of the points behind her 1st serve and 51% (24/47) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Friedsam 6 times after converting 30% of her break points (6/20).
McNally has a winning match record in the last 7 years having won 58% of her matches (99-73). 2-4 on hard in 2022. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this event, McNally has an aggregate52-44 win-loss record in the last 7 years on hard.
Caty has an aggregate 4-5 win-loss record in 2022, 2-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Indian Wells
Kirsten Flipkens
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 13-9 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 7-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 7-8 | 7-7 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 9-10 | 8-8 | 0-2 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 30-26 | 17-13 | 0-5 | 10-4 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2018 | 31-24 | 12-11 | 8-6 | 2-5 | 9-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 333, Kirsten got to the qualifications after defeating Lauren Davis 7-5 6-3.
In the qualifications, Flipkens had a good straight sets win against Davis (7-5 6-3). During the match Flipkens scored 65 points vs Davis’s 50. The Belgian was extremely aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Talking about serving, Flipkens wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and she was exceptionally consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Kirsten Flipkens lost the serve 3 times and she saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Flipkens put 59% of her first serves in, winning 65% (22/34) of the points behind her 1st serve and 58% (14/24) on the 2nd serve. Flipkens broke Davis 5 times after converting 71% of her break points (5/7).
The Belgian has an overall 4-4 win-loss record in 2022, 4-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Indian Wells
Previously, her best result was reaching the 3rd round in 2010 and 2013. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | McNally | Flipkens |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 34 | 21 |
| Pts | 129-122 | 65-50 |
| Total Points | 251 | 115 |
| Winners | 45 | 22 |
| %Winners | 35% | 34% |
Both McNally and Flipkens played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Caty McNally dropped 1 set while Kirsten Flipkens hasn’t conceded a set so far. McNally has played 1 set more than Flipkens (3 vs 2). Therefore, McNally played 13 games more than Flipkens. The American scored 45 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, The Belgian blasted 22 winners (34%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | McNally | Flipkens |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 0 |
| 1st in | 70/117 | 34/58 |
| %1st in | 60% | 59% |
| 1st pts | 45/70 | 22/34 |
| %1st pts | 64% | 65% |
| 2nd pts | 24/47 | 14/24 |
| %2nd pts | 51% | 58% |
McNally fired 3 aces . Flipkens didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. McNally won 64% points behind her first serve. She very solid her second serve to win 51% of the points. On the other side, Flipkens won 65% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | McNally | Flipkens |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 5 |
| Converted | 6/20 | 5/7 |
| % Converted | 30% | 71% |
| Conceded | 14 | 4 |
| Saved | 9 | 1 |
| % Saved | 64% | 25% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 3 |
The American broke her opponent 6 times with a 30% conversion rate. The American dropped her serve 5 times and she saved 64% of the break points that she conceded. Flipkens broke her opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. Kirsten conceded her serve 3 times and she saved 25% of the break points that she conceded.
| McNally | |||
| Q1 Friedsam |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 7-5 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 34 | 34 | |
| pts | 129-122 | 129-122 | |
| Total points | 251 | 251 | |
| Winners | 45 | 45 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 9 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 70/117 | 70/117 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 45/70 | 45/70 | |
| % 1st pts | 64% | 64% | |
| 2nd pts | 24/47 | 24/47 | |
| % 2nd pts | 51% | 51% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/20 | 6/20 | |
| Converted % | 30% | 30% | |
| Conceded | 14 | 14 | |
| Saved | 9/14 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 64% | 64% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
| Flipkens | |||
| Q1 Davis |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 65-50 | 65-50 | |
| Total points | 115 | 115 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 34/58 | 34/58 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 22/34 | 22/34 | |
| % 1st pts | 65% | 65% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/24 | 14/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 1/4 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 25% | 25% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLL
Tennis Scores in Indian Wells
- Leonardo MayerMayer – Paul-Henri MathieuMathieu (2-6 6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Arthur De GreefDe Greef – Tommy RobredoRobredo (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Federico DelbonisDelbonis – Stephane RobertRobert (6-2 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Calvin HemeryHemery (6-2 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mai HontamaHontama – Heather WatsonWatson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marie BouzkovaBouzkova – Chloe PaquetPaquet (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kaja JuvanJuvan – Lesya TsurenkoTsurenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anna KalinskayaKalinskaya – Qiang WangWang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katie BoulterBoulter – Sara ErraniErrani (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Magdalena FrechFrech – Daria GavrilovaGavrilova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kirsten FlipkensFlipkens – Caty McNallyMcNally (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Astra SharmaSharma – Viktoriya TomovaTomova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Harmony TanTan – Aleksandra KrunicKrunic (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anastasia GasanovaGasanova – Harriet DartDart (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Lucia BronzettiBronzetti – Dalma GalfiGalfi (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ajla TomljanovicTomljanovic – Hailey BaptisteBaptiste (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ekaterina AlexandrovaAlexandrova – Elvina KalievaKalieva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dayana YastremskaYastremska – Caroline GarciaGarcia (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anna BondarBondar – Petra MarticMartic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ann LiLi – Madison BrengleBrengle (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Danka KovinicKovinic – Jil TeichmannTeichmann (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Clara BurelBurel – Anhelina KalininaKalinina (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Beatriz Haddad MaiaHaddad Maia – Sofia KeninKenin (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katie VolynetsVolynets – Arantxa RusRus (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Qinwen ZhengZheng – Vera ZvonarevaZvonareva (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ana KonjuhKonjuh – Alize CornetCornet (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Anastasia PotapovaPotapova – Misaki DoiDoi (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Amanda AnisimovaAnisimova – Emma NavarroNavarro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nuria Parrizas-DiazParrizas-Diaz – Shelby RogersRogers (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sloane StephensStephens – Naomi OsakaOsaka (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kristina KucovaKucova – Elena Gabriela RuseGabriela Ruse (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katerina SiniakovaSiniakova – Irina-Camelia BeguBegu (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Maria Camila Osorio SerranoCamila Osorio Serrano – Aliaksandra SasnovichSasnovich (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Marta KostyukKostyuk – Maryna ZanevskaZanevska (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Magda LinetteLinette – Andrea PetkovicPetkovic (0-1) – H2H and prediction
