Emilio Gomez and William Blumberg will square off in the 2nd round of the Cleveland Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 11:00 am on CENTER COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Emilio Gomez who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Emilio Gomez is the pick to win this match.
Emilio Gomez -> 1.285
William Blumberg -> 3.64
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Emilio Gomez vs. William Blumberg
There is no head to head record between Emilio Gomez and William Blumberg since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Emilio Gomez
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6-8 | 0-0 | 6-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 16-28 | 8-16 | 2-6 | 5-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 47-26 | 38-15 | 1-3 | 8-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 37-33 | 25-15 | 9-11 | 3-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 12-15 | 2-5 | 4-6 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 142 (career-high), Emilio got to the 2nd round after defeating Jason Jung 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round, Emilio had a good straight sets win against Jung (6-3 6-4). During the match, Gomez scored 75 points vs Jung’s 64. The Ecuadorian was very aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Regarding the service games, Gomez scored 3 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Emilio Gomez lost the serve twice and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Gomez put 63% of his first serves in, winning 69% (29/42) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (12/25) on the 2nd serve. Emilio broke Jung 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Gomez has a good match record in the last 10 years having won 58% of his matches (313-225). 3-1 on indoor hard courts in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Gomez has a compiled 24-22 win-loss record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Gomez has a compiled 6-2 win-loss record in 2022, 3-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Cleveland Challenger
William Blumberg
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 6-4 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-3 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked, William reached the 2nd round after beating Roberto Quiroz 6-4 6-77 6-4.
In the 1st round, The American defeated Quiroz (6-4 6-77 6-4). During the match Blumberg scored 102 points vs Quiroz’s 101. The American was exceptionally aggressive to blast 40 winners.
Talking about serving, Blumberg scored 5 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. William Blumberg lost the serve twice and he saved 11 break points. Furthermore, Blumberg put 52% of his first serves in, winning 69% (40/58) of the points behind his 1st serve and 57% (31/54) on the 2nd serve. William broke Quiroz 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
The American has an aggregate 1-0 win-loss record in 2022, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Cleveland Challenger
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gomez | Blumberg |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 33 |
| Pts | 75-64 | 102-101 |
| Total Points | 139 | 203 |
| Winners | 29 | 40 |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% |
Both Gomez and Blumberg played 1 match. At the moment, William Blumberg dropped 1 set while Emilio Gomez hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Gomez has played 1 set(s) less than Blumberg (2 vs 3). Therefore, Gomez played 14 games less than Blumberg. Gomez scored 29 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, William struck 40 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gomez | Blumberg |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 5 |
| 1st in | 42/67 | 58/112 |
| %1st in | 63% | 52% |
| 1st pts | 29/42 | 40/58 |
| %1st pts | 69% | 69% |
| 2nd pts | 12/25 | 31/54 |
| %2nd pts | 48% | 57% |
Gomez bagged 3 aces . Blumberg blasted 5 aces . Gomez won 69% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 48% of the points. On the other side, Blumberg won 69% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gomez | Blumberg |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/5 |
| % Converted | 50% | 80% |
| Conceded | 8 | 13 |
| Saved | 6 | 11 |
| % Saved | 75% | 85% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Emilio broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. Gomez lost his serve twice and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. Blumberg broke his opponent 4 times with a 80% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve twice and he saved 85% of the break points that he conceded.
| Gomez | |||
| R1 Jung |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 75-64 | 75-64 | |
| Total points | 139 | 139 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 42/67 | 42/67 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 29/42 | 29/42 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/25 | 12/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 6/8 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Blumberg | |||
| R1 Quiroz |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-77 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 33 | 33 | |
| pts | 102-101 | 102-101 | |
| Total points | 203 | 203 | |
| Winners | 40 | 40 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 58/112 | 58/112 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
| 1st pts | 40/58 | 40/58 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 31/54 | 31/54 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 4/5 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 80% | |
| Conceded | 13 | 13 | |
| Saved | 11/13 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 85% | 85% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWWLWLLW
Tennis Scores in Cleveland Challenger
- Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe – Jurij RodionovRodionov (7-5 3-6 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo – Nicola KuhnKuhn (6-76 7-5 4-0 ret.) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Dominic Stephan StrickerStephan Stricker – Emilio NavaNava (3-6 6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Thomas FabbianoFabbiano – Tennys SandgrenSandgren (3-6 6-4 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Thomas FabbianoFabbiano – Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe (1-4) – H2H and prediction
- Jack SockSock – Michael MmohMmoh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- William BlumbergBlumberg – Emilio GomezGomez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Liam BroadyBroady (0-0) – H2H and prediction
