Nicolas Mejia and Ulises Blanch will face off in the qualifications of the Cleveland Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 10:00 am on CENTER COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Ulises Blanch who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Ulises Blanch is the pick to win this match.
Ulises Blanch -> 1.88
Nicolas Mejia -> 1.88
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Nicolas Mejia vs. Ulises Blanch
This will be the 2nd time that Nicolas Mejia and Ulises Blanch clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Mejia (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they played, Mejia won 7-6(5) 7-6(7) in the 1st round in the Montevideo Challenger back in 2019.
Nicolas Mejia
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 41-28 | 18-20 | 23-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 24-33 | 6-13 | 18-18 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
2022 | 31-35 | 13-12 | 15-13 | 3-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 24-28 | 16-10 | 5-13 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 4-7 | 2-4 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 277, Nicolas got to the qualifications after defeating Lorenzo Claverie 6-2 6-1.
In the qualifications, Nicolas had a good straight sets win against Claverie (6-2 6-1). During the match, Mejia and Claverie scored the same amount of points (). However, the world no. 277 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. The Colombian was not very aggressive to strike just winners.
Regarding the service games, Mejia couldn’t to score even 1 ace during the encounter and he was exceptionally consistent in conceding no double faults. Nicolas Mejia conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 0% of his first serves in, win 0% (0) of the points behind his 1st serve and 0% (0) on the 2nd serve.
Mejia has a winning match record in the last 7 years having won 58% of his matches (111-81). 3-3 on indoor hard courts in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Mejia has a compiled6-9 win-loss record in the last 7 years on indoor hard courts.
Mejia has an aggregate 3-3 win-loss record in 2022, 3-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Cleveland Challenger
Ulises Blanch
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 14-9 | 10-4 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 22-23 | 14-11 | 7-7 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 29-29 | 10-12 | 6-5 | 13-11 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
2021 | 16-21 | 11-13 | 2-4 | 2-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2020 | 20-15 | 7-6 | 3-5 | 10-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 297, Blanch reached the qualifications after defeating Alexander Cozbinov 4-6 6-4 6-4.
In the qualifications against Cozbinov, Blanch recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-4 6-4). During the match Blanch and Cozbinov scored the same amount of points (). However, the world no. 277 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. Blanch was not very aggressive do strike just winners.
Talking about serving, Blanch wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he was very consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Ulises Blanch conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 0% of his first serves in, win 0% (/) of the points behind his 1st serve and 0% (/) on the 2nd serve.
Ulises has a composed 2-2 win-loss record in 2022, 2-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Cleveland Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the quarter in 2020. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Mejia | Blanch |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
Tot Games | 15 | 30 |
Pts | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Total Points | 0 | 0 |
Winners | 0 | 0 |
%Winners | 0% | 0% |
Both Mejia and Blanch played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Ulises Blanch lost 1 set while Nicolas Mejia hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Mejia has played 1 set(s) less than Blanch (2 vs 3). Therefore, Mejia played 15 games less than Blanch. The Colombian scored 0 winners (0% of the total points). On the other side, The American recorded 0 winners (0%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Mejia | Blanch |
---|---|---|
Aces | 0 | 0 |
Avg per match | 0 | 0 |
1st in | 0/0 | 0/0 |
%1st in | 0% | 0% |
1st pts | 0/0 | 0/0 |
%1st pts | 0% | 0% |
2nd pts | 0/0 | 0/0 |
%2nd pts | 0% | 0% |
Mejia didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Blanch also didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Mejia won 0% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 0% of the points. On the other side, Blanch won 0% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 0% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Mejia | Blanch |
---|---|---|
Won | 0 | 0 |
Converted | 0/0 | 0/0 |
% Converted | 0% | 0% |
Conceded | 0 | 0 |
Saved | 0 | 0 |
% Saved | 0% | 0% |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
The Colombian hasn’t manged yet to break his opponent. He didn’t manage to even clinch a single break point. Mejia pretty solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points without even conceding a single break point. On the other side, Ulises hasn’t manged yet to break his opponent. He didn’t manage to even clinch a single break point. Blanch was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points without even conceding a single break point.
Mejia | |||
Q1 Claverie |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
pts | – | 0-0 | |
Total points | 0 | 0 | |
Winners | 0 | ||
%Winners | 0% | 0% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 0 | 0 | |
Double Faults | 0 | ||
1st in | / | 0/0 | |
% 1st in | 0% | 0% | |
1st pts | / | 0/0 | |
% 1st pts | 0% | % | |
2nd pts | / | 0/0 | |
% 2nd pts | 0% | 0% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 0 | ||
Converted | / | 0/0 | |
Converted % | 0% | 0% | |
Conceded | 0 | ||
Saved | 0/ | 0 | |
Saved % | – | 0% | |
Times Broken | 0 |
Blanch | |||
Q1 Cozbinov |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
pts | – | 0-0 | |
Total points | 0 | 0 | |
Winners | 0 | ||
%Winners | 0% | 0% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 0 | 0 | |
Double Faults | 0 | ||
1st in | / | 0/0 | |
% 1st in | 0% | 0% | |
1st pts | / | 0/0 | |
% 1st pts | 0% | 0% | |
2nd pts | / | 0/0 | |
% 2nd pts | 0% | 0% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 0 | ||
Converted | / | 0/0 | |
Converted % | 0% | 0% | |
Conceded | 0 | ||
Saved | 0/ | 0 | |
Saved % | – | 0% | |
Times Broken | 0 |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Thomas FabbianoFabbiano – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jason JungJung – Emilio GomezGomez (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto QuirozQuiroz – Michael GeertsGeerts (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Christian HarrisonHarrison (4-1) – H2H and prediction
- Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe – Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jack SockSock – Brayden SchnurSchnur (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka – Denis IstominIstomin (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael MmohMmoh – Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo – Keegan SmithSmith (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex RybakovRybakov – Sebastian FanselowFanselow (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michail PervolarakisPervolarakis – Rinky HijikataHijikata (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – Emilio NavaNava (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Ulises BlanchBlanch (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Nick HardtHardt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicola KuhnKuhn – Bjorn FratangeloFratangelo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jeff WolfWolf – Liam BroadyBroady (0-1) – H2H and prediction