Kacper Zuk and Tim Van Rijthoven will face off in the 2nd round of the Quimper Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 5:00 pm on COURT CENTRAL. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tim Van Rijthoven who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Tim Van Rijthoven is the pick to win this match.
Tim Van Rijthoven -> 1.9
Kacper Zuk -> 1.9
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Kacper Zuk vs. Tim Van Rijthoven
This will be the 3rd time that Kacper Zuk and Tim Van Rijthoven fight against each other. The head to head is 2-0 for Zuk (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they fought against each other, Zuk won 7-6(6) 6-7(6) 6-3 in the 2nd round in M25 Hamburg back in 2020.
Kacper Zuk
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 8-11 | 0-1 | 5-6 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2023 | 26-29 | 7-9 | 5-8 | 6-11 | 0-0 | 8-1 |
| 2022 | 35-27 | 12-7 | 6-9 | 12-9 | 0-1 | 5-1 |
| 2021 | 41-25 | 5-5 | 17-8 | 15-8 | 2-2 | 2-2 |
| 2020 | 31-9 | 6-2 | 10-4 | 15-2 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 171, Zuk reached the 2nd round after defeating Gilles Simon 7-65 4-6 6-3.
In the 1st round, Zuk defeated Simon (7-65 4-6 6-3).During the match, Zuk scored less points (5) than Simon. In fact, the world no. 171 won 114 points vs Simon’s. That means that Zuk was more focused during the important points. The Pole was pretty aggressive to blast 59 winners.
Talking about the service games, Zuk recorded 7 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Kacper Zuk lost the serve twice and he saved 10 break points. Furthermore, Zuk put 61% of his first serves in, winning 71% (59/83) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (23/53) on the 2nd serve. Zuk broke Simon twice after converting 25% of his break points (2/8).
Zuk has a solid match record in the last 7 years having won 63% of his matches (164-97). 1-1 on indoor hard courts in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Zuk has an aggregate36-14 win-loss record in the last 7 years on indoor hard courts.
Kacper has an aggregate 1-2 win-loss record in 2022, 1-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Quimper Challenger
Tim Van Rijthoven
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 0-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 2-3 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-24 | 3-4 | 2-2 | 25-15 | 8-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 37-22 | 13-7 | 7-6 | 16-8 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
Ranked no. 258, Tim reached the 2nd round after beating Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg 7-5 7-64, Filip Cristian Jianu 6-4 6-4 and Antoine Hoang 7-62 6-3.
In the 1st round, Tim had a good straight sets win against Hoang (7-62 6-3). During the match Van Rijthoven scored 79 points vs Hoang’s 61. Tim was pretty aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about serving, Van Rijthoven recorded 8 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Tim Van Rijthoven was pretty efficient on serve to win 91% (32/35) of his 1st serve and 71% (12/17) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Dutch broke Hoang twice after converting 18% of his break points (2/11).
Tim has a compiled 5-2 win-loss record in 2022, 3-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Quimper Challenger
Tim has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Zuk | Van Rijthoven |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 32 | 67 |
| Pts | 114-119 | 245-203 |
| Total Points | 233 | 448 |
| Winners | 59 | 103 |
| %Winners | 52% | 42% |
Zuk played 1 match while Van Rijthoven competed in 3 matches. Van Rijthoven started his run from the qualifications while Zuk had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Kacper Zuk lost 1 set while Tim Van Rijthoven hasn’t lost a set so far. Zuk has played 3 set(s) less than Van Rijthoven (3 vs 6). Therefore, Zuk played 35 games less than Van Rijthoven. Kacper scored 59 winners (52% of the total points). On the other side, The Dutch recorded 103 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Zuk | Van Rijthoven |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 24 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 8 |
| 1st in | 83/136 | 125/183 |
| %1st in | 61% | 68% |
| 1st pts | 59/83 | 103/125 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 82% |
| 2nd pts | 23/53 | 37/58 |
| %2nd pts | 43% | 64% |
Zuk fired 7 aces . Van Rijthoven scored 24 aces (8 per match). Zuk won 71% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 43% of the points. On the other side, Van Rijthoven won 82% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 64% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Zuk | Van Rijthoven |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 6 |
| Converted | 2/8 | 6/24 |
| % Converted | 25% | 25% |
| Conceded | 12 | 8 |
| Saved | 10 | 7 |
| % Saved | 83% | 88% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
Kacper broke his opponent twice with a 25% conversion rate. Zuk dropped his serve twice and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded. The Dutch broke his opponents 6 times with a 25% conversion rate. Van Rijthoven conceded his serve once and he saved 88% of the break points that he conceded.
| Zuk | |||
| R1 Simon |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-65 4-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 32 | |
| pts | 114-119 | 114-119 | |
| Total points | 233 | 233 | |
| Winners | 59 | 59 | |
| %Winners | 52% | 52% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 7 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 83/136 | 83/136 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 59/83 | 59/83 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 23/53 | 23/53 | |
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 43% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/8 | 2/8 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
| Conceded | 12 | 12 | |
| Saved | 10/12 | 10 | |
| Saved % | 83% | 83% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Van Rijthoven | |||||
| Q1 Gueymard Wayenburg |
Q3 Cristian Jianu |
R1 Hoang |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 7-64 | 6-4 6-4 | 7-62 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 20 | 22 | 67 | |
| pts | 88-75 | 78-67 | 79-61 | 245-203 | |
| Total points | 163 | 145 | 140 | 448 | |
| Winners | 42 | 29 | 32 | 103 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 37% | 41% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 11 | 5 | 8 | 24 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 2 | 3 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 48/70 | 42/61 | 35/52 | 125/183 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | 67% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 42/48 | 29/42 | 32/35 | 103/125 | |
| % 1st pts | 88% | 69% | 91% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/22 | 13/19 | 12/17 | 37/58 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 68% | 71% | 64% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6 | |
| Converted | 1/6 | 3/7 | 2/11 | 6/24 | |
| Converted % | 17% | 43% | 18% | 25% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 8 | 0 | 8 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 7/8 | 0/0 | 7 | |
| Saved % | – | 88% | – | 88% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LL Tennis Scores in Quimper Challenger
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Lucas PouillePouille (6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Joao SousaSousa – Constant LestienneLestienne (6-3 2-6 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alexandre MullerMuller – Jo-Wilfried TsongaTsonga (6-2 4-6 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Dennis NovakNovak – Evan FurnessFurness (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Vasek PospisilPospisil – Lukas LackoLacko (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ruben BemelmansBemelmans – Hiroki MoriyaMoriya (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Andrey KuznetsovKuznetsov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dennis NovakNovak – Joao SousaSousa (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tim Van RijthovenVan Rijthoven – Kacper ZukZuk (0-2) – H2H and prediction
