Emilio Gomez and Nicola Kuhn will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Columbus Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 10:00 am on COURT 5. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Emilio Gomez who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Emilio Gomez is the pick to win this match.
Emilio Gomez -> 1.63
Nicola Kuhn -> 2.28
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Emilio Gomez vs. Nicola Kuhn
This will be the 3rd time that Emilio Gomez and Nicola Kuhn face off. The head to head is 2-0 for Gomez (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they locked horns, Gomez won 6-4 6-4 in the qualifications in at the Australian Open back in January 2022.
Emilio Gomez
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6-11 | 0-2 | 6-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 16-28 | 8-16 | 2-6 | 5-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 47-26 | 38-15 | 1-3 | 8-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 37-33 | 25-15 | 9-11 | 3-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 12-15 | 2-5 | 4-6 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 153, the Ecuadorian reached the 2nd round after defeating Geoffrey Blancaneaux 7-5 7-5.
In the 1st round, The Ecuadorian had a good straight sets win against Blancaneaux (7-5 7-5). During the match, Gomez scored 78 points vs Blancaneaux’s 71. The Ecuadorian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Talking about the service games, Gomez bagged 2 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Emilio Gomez lost the serve twice and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Gomez put 68% of his first serves in, winning 70% (35/50) of the points behind his 1st serve and 46% (11/24) on the 2nd serve. Emilio broke Blancaneaux 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Gomez has a favorable record in the last 10 years having won 58% of his matches (311-224). 1-0 on indoor hard courts in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Gomez has an aggregate 22-21 win-loss record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Gomez has a composed 4-1 win-loss record in 2022, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Columbus Challenger
Nicola Kuhn
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 3-3 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 42-14 | 8-3 | 29-9 | 5-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 17-5 | 0-0 | 17-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 14-21 | 4-5 | 4-9 | 3-5 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 20-28 | 2-6 | 14-15 | 2-4 | 2-2 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 251, Kuhn reached the 2nd round after defeating Yasutaka Uchiyama 7-66 6-4.
In the 1st round, Nicola had a good straight sets win against Uchiyama (7-66 6-4). During the match Kuhn scored 69 points vs Uchiyama’s 66. Kuhn was very aggressive to blast 27 winners.
About the serving games, Kuhn struck 8 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Nicola Kuhn was pretty effective on serve to win 73% (27/37) of his 1st serve and 67% (22/33) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Kuhn broke Uchiyama twice after converting 50% of his break points (2/4).
Kuhn has an aggregate 3-2 win-loss record in 2022, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gomez | Kuhn |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 24 | 23 |
| Pts | 78-71 | 69-66 |
| Total Points | 149 | 135 |
| Winners | 35 | 27 |
| %Winners | 45% | 39% |
Both Gomez and Kuhn played 1 match. Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Gomez and Kuhn have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Gomez played 1 game more than Kuhn. Gomez scored 35 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, Nicola fired 27 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gomez | Kuhn |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 8 |
| 1st in | 50/74 | 37/70 |
| %1st in | 68% | 53% |
| 1st pts | 35/50 | 27/37 |
| %1st pts | 70% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 11/24 | 22/33 |
| %2nd pts | 46% | 67% |
Gomez made 2 aces . Kuhn fired 8 aces . Gomez won 70% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 46% of the points. On the other side, Kuhn won 73% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 67% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gomez | Kuhn |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 2 |
| Converted | 4/9 | 2/4 |
| % Converted | 44% | 50% |
| Conceded | 7 | 3 |
| Saved | 5 | 2 |
| % Saved | 71% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
The Ecuadorian broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Gomez lost his serve twice and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded. The Spaniard broke his opponent twice with a 50% conversion rate. The Spaniard conceded his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Gomez | |||
| R1 Blancaneaux |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 24 | 24 | |
| pts | 78-71 | 78-71 | |
| Total points | 149 | 149 | |
| Winners | 35 | 35 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 50/74 | 50/74 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 35/50 | 35/50 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/24 | 11/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 46% | 46% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 5/7 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 71% | 71% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Kuhn | |||
| R1 Uchiyama |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-66 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 69-66 | 69-66 | |
| Total points | 135 | 135 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 37/70 | 37/70 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 27/37 | 27/37 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/33 | 22/33 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 67% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/4 | 2/4 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
WWLLWL Tennis Scores in Columbus Challenger
- Denis IstominIstomin – Sebastian FanselowFanselow (7-5 1-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Ulises BlanchBlanch – Roberto QuirozQuiroz (7-67 6-4) – See score progression
- Nick HardtHardt – Ryan HarrisonHarrison (6-4 7-63) – See score progression
- Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard – Michael MmohMmoh (6-4 7-63) – See score progression
- Jeff WolfWolf – Jack AnthropAnthrop (6-0 6-3) – See score progression
- Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka – Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (2-6 6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo – Jason JungJung (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Bjorn FratangeloFratangelo – Nicolas MejiaMejia (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Brayden SchnurSchnur (6-4 5-7 7-5) – See score progression
- Dominic Stephan StrickerStephan Stricker – Tennys SandgrenSandgren (6-4 6-73 7-60) – See score progression
- Nicola KuhnKuhn – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (7-66 6-4) – See score progression
- Emilio GomezGomez – Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Go SoedaSoeda – Tung-Lin WuWu (7-65 6-2) – See score progression
- Jack SockSock – Christopher EubanksEubanks (7-67 6-74 6-4) – See score progression
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Alexander BernardBernard (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jack SockSock – Go SoedaSoeda (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Bjorn FratangeloFratangelo – Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka – Jeff WolfWolf (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ulises BlanchBlanch – Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nick HardtHardt – Jurij RodionovRodionov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby – Denis IstominIstomin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicola KuhnKuhn – Emilio GomezGomez (0-2) – H2H and prediction
