Alison Riske and Madison Brengle will play each other in the quarter of the Adelaide International 2 for the 6th time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 11:00 am on CENTRE COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Alison Riske who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Alison Riske is the pick to win this match.
Alison Riske -> 1.72
Madison Brengle -> 2.22
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Alison Riske vs. Madison Brengle
This will be the 6th time that Alison Riske and Madison Brengle face off. The head to head is 5-0 for Riske (see full H2H stats), 4-0 on hard.
The last time that they squared off, Riske won 5-7 6-3 6-4 in the 1st round in Tokyo back in 2017.
Alison Riske
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 1-11 | 1-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-21 | 15-14 | 2-3 | 1-0 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 16-16 | 7-9 | 0-2 | 7-2 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 6-8 | 6-6 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 36-24 | 22-18 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 14-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 57, Riske reached the quarter after beating Magda Linette 6-4 6-4 and Anhelina Kalinina 6-1 6-3.
In the 2nd round, Riske had a good straight sets win against Kalinina (6-1 6-3). During the match, Riske scored 61 points vs Kalinina’s 38. The American was exceptionally aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Regarding the service games, Riske scored 6 aces and she committed only 1 double fault. Alison Riske lost the serve once and she saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Riske put 70% of her first serves in, winning 74% (29/39) of the points behind her 1st serve and 47% (8/17) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Kalinina 5 times after converting 56% of her break points (5/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Alison started her run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, she hasn’t conceded yet a set in this competition to conquer 58% of the points she played.
Riske has a winning match record in the last 10 years having won 54% of her matches (235-200). 2-1 on hard in 2022. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this competition, Riske has a composed 127-118 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
Alison has a compiled 2-1 win-loss record in 2022, 2-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Adelaide
Riske has never competed in this tournament before.
Madison Brengle
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 26-26 | 16-15 | 4-3 | 3-3 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-26 | 30-14 | 5-6 | 1-1 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 36-25 | 18-13 | 8-7 | 7-1 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 13-11 | 9-7 | 1-2 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 31-25 | 17-12 | 6-7 | 3-2 | 5-4 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 59, Brengle reached the quarter after beating Anastasia Potapova 7-5 4-6 6-1 and Rebecca Peterson 6-3 6-2.
In the 2nd round, The American had a good straight sets win against Peterson (6-3 6-2). During the match Brengle scored 76 points vs Peterson’s 57. Madison was very aggressive to blast 28 winners.
About the serving games, Brengle couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and she was pretty steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Madison Brengle lost the serve twice and she saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Brengle put 84% of her first serves in, winning 57% (28/49) of the points behind her 1st serve and 67% (6/9) on the 2nd serve. Brengle broke Peterson 6 times after converting 32% of her break points (6/19).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Madison started her run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, she has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 55% of the points she played.
The American has a composed 3-1 win-loss record in 2022, 3-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Adelaide
Madison has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Riske | Brengle |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 36 | 46 |
| Pts | 135-98 | 171-140 |
| Total Points | 233 | 311 |
| Winners | 61 | 64 |
| %Winners | 45% | 37% |
Both Riske and Brengle played 2 matches. At the moment, Madison Brengle conceded 1 set while Alison Riske hasn’t conceded a set so far. Riske has played 1 set(s) less than Brengle (4 vs 5). Therefore, Riske played 10 games less than Brengle. The American scored 61 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, The American managed to score 64 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Riske | Brengle |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 11 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 5.5 | 0 |
| 1st in | 87/122 | 115/138 |
| %1st in | 71% | 83% |
| 1st pts | 61/87 | 64/115 |
| %1st pts | 70% | 56% |
| 2nd pts | 17/35 | 15/23 |
| %2nd pts | 49% | 65% |
Riske bagged 11 aces (5.5 per match). Brengle didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Riske won 70% points behind her first serve. She pretty solid on her second serve to win 49% of the points. On the other side, Brengle won 56% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 65% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Riske | Brengle |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 9 | 15 |
| Converted | 9/17 | 15/40 |
| % Converted | 53% | 38% |
| Conceded | 10 | 16 |
| Saved | 7 | 8 |
| % Saved | 70% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 8 |
Riske broke her opponents 9 times with a 53% conversion rate. Alison conceded her serve 3 times and she saved 70% of the break points that she conceded. The American broke her opponents 15 times with a 38% conversion rate. The American conceded her serve 8 times and she saved 50% of the break points that she conceded.
| Riske | ||||
| R1 Linette |
R2 Kalinina |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | 6-1 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 16 | 36 | |
| pts | 74-60 | 61-38 | 135-98 | |
| Total points | 134 | 99 | 233 | |
| Winners | 32 | 29 | 61 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 48% | 45% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 5 | 6 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 48/66 | 39/56 | 87/122 | |
| % 1st in | 73% | 70% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 32/48 | 29/39 | 61/87 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 74% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/18 | 8/17 | 17/35 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 47% | 49% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 5 | 9 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 5/9 | 9/17 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 56% | 53% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 4 | 10 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 3/4 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 75% | 71% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
| Brengle | ||||
| R1 Potapova |
R2 Peterson |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 4-6 6-1 | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 17 | 46 | |
| pts | 95-83 | 76-57 | 171-140 | |
| Total points | 178 | 133 | 311 | |
| Winners | 36 | 28 | 64 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 0 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 66/80 | 49/58 | 115/138 | |
| % 1st in | 83% | 84% | 83% | |
| 1st pts | 36/66 | 28/49 | 64/115 | |
| % 1st pts | 55% | 57% | 56% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/14 | 6/9 | 15/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 67% | 65% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 9 | 6 | 15 | |
| Converted | 9/21 | 6/19 | 15/40 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 32% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 7 | 16 | |
| Saved | 3/9 | 5/7 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 71% | 52% | |
| Times Broken | 6 | 2 | 8 | |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Adelaide
- Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic – Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild (4-6 6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Tamara ZidansekZidansek – Maddison InglisInglis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Madison BrengleBrengle – Alison RiskeRiske (0-5) – H2H and prediction
- Ana KonjuhKonjuh – Cori GauffGauff (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ludmilla SamsonovaSamsonova – Madison KeysKeys (1-0) – H2H and prediction
