Lauren Davis and Eri Hozumi will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Adelaide International 2 for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 10:00 am on MATCH COURT 3. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Lauren Davis who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Lauren Davis is the pick to win this match.
Lauren Davis -> 1.18
Eri Hozumi -> 4.50
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Lauren Davis vs. Eri Hozumi
There is no head to head record between Lauren Davis and Eri Hozumi since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Lauren Davis
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 14-15 | 5-6 | 2-6 | 6-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
2023 | 25-20 | 16-11 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
2022 | 28-25 | 14-12 | 11-9 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
2021 | 20-21 | 8-11 | 6-5 | 2-1 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
2020 | 7-12 | 5-8 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 89, the American got to the qualifications after beating Annerly Poulos 6-3 6-3.
In the qualifications, The American had a good straight sets win against Poulos (6-3 6-3). During the match, Davis scored 76 points vs Poulos’s 57. The American was extremely aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about the service games, Davis struck 3 aces and she committed only 3 double faults. Lauren Davis lost the serve twice and she saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Davis put 58% of her first serves in, winning 87% (26/30) of the points behind her 1st serve and 41% (9/22) on the 2nd serve. Lauren broke Poulos 5 times after converting 33% of her break points (5/15).
Davis has a positive record in the last 10 years having won 54% of her matches (228-196). 1-1 on hard in 2022. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this competition, Davis has a composed 128-120 record in the last years on hard.
Davis has an aggregate 1-1 win-loss record in 2022, 1-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Adelaide
Davis has never competed in this tournament before.
Eri Hozumi
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 14-11 | 11-9 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 8-11 | 4-6 | 2-2 | 0-1 | 1-1 | 1-1 |
2021 | 20-16 | 17-10 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 1-5 | 1-2 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 399, the Japanese reached the qualifications after beating Kaja Juvan 2-6 6-2 ret..
In the qualifications against Juvan, Eri recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 6-2 ret.). During the match Hozumi scored 49 points vs Juvan’s 47. Hozumi was exceptionally aggressive to blast 19 winners.
About the serving games, Hozumi scored just 1 ace during the entire match and she committed only 2 double faults. Eri Hozumi lost the serve 3 times and she saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Hozumi put 59% of her first serves in, winning 70% (19/27) of the points behind her 1st serve and 37% (7/19) on the 2nd serve. Hozumi broke Juvan 3 times after converting 75% of her break points (3/4).
Hozumi has a composed 1-0 win-loss record in 2022, 1-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Davis | Hozumi |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
Tot Games | 18 | 16 |
Pts | 76-57 | 49-47 |
Total Points | 133 | 96 |
Winners | 26 | 19 |
%Winners | 34% | 39% |
Both Davis and Hozumi played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Eri Hozumi dropped 1 set while Lauren Davis hasn’t dropped a set so far. Davis has played 1 set(s) less than Hozumi (2 vs 3). However, it’s interesting to notice that Davis played 2 games more than Hozumi. Davis scored 26 winners (34% of the total points). On the other side, Hozumi fired 19 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Davis | Hozumi |
---|---|---|
Aces | 3 | 1 |
Avg per match | 3 | 1 |
1st in | 30/52 | 27/46 |
%1st in | 58% | 59% |
1st pts | 26/30 | 19/27 |
%1st pts | 87% | 70% |
2nd pts | 9/22 | 7/19 |
%2nd pts | 41% | 37% |
Davis fired 3 aces . Hozumi scored 1 ace . Davis won 87% points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 41% of the points. On the other side, Hozumi won 70% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 37% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Davis | Hozumi |
---|---|---|
Won | 5 | 3 |
Converted | 5/15 | 3/4 |
% Converted | 33% | 75% |
Conceded | 4 | 6 |
Saved | 2 | 3 |
% Saved | 50% | 50% |
Times Broken | 2 | 3 |
The American broke her opponent 5 times with a 33% conversion rate. Davis surrendered her serve twice and she saved 50% of the break points that she conceded. Hozumi broke her opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. Hozumi conceded her serve 3 times and she saved 50% of the break points that she conceded.
Davis | |||
Q1 Poulos |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
pts | 76-57 | 76-57 | |
Total points | 133 | 133 | |
Winners | 26 | 26 | |
%Winners | 34% | 34% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 3 | 3 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
1st in | 30/52 | 30/52 | |
% 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
1st pts | 26/30 | 26/30 | |
% 1st pts | 87% | 87% | |
2nd pts | 9/22 | 9/22 | |
% 2nd pts | 41% | 41% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/15 | 5/15 | |
Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Hozumi | |||
Q1 Juvan |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 2-6 6-2 ret. | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
pts | 49-47 | 49-47 | |
Total points | 96 | 96 | |
Winners | 19 | 19 | |
%Winners | 39% | 39% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 1 | 1 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 27/46 | 27/46 | |
% 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
1st pts | 19/27 | 19/27 | |
% 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
2nd pts | 7/19 | 7/19 | |
% 2nd pts | 37% | 37% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
Saved | 3/6 | 3 | |
Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Alison Van UytvanckVan Uytvanck – Dayana YastremskaYastremska (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kirsten FlipkensFlipkens – Storm SandersSanders (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anastasia PotapovaPotapova – Kristina KucovaKucova (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Heather WatsonWatson – Danka KovinicKovinic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rebecca PetersonPeterson – Xiyu WangWang (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Lauren DavisDavis – Eri HozumiHozumi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Magda LinetteLinette – Alison RiskeRiske (0-4) – H2H and prediction
- Anhelina KalininaKalinina – Veronika KudermetovaKudermetova (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Marketa VondrousovaVondrousova – Viktorija GolubicGolubic (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ana KonjuhKonjuh – Daria GavrilovaGavrilova (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Marta KostyukKostyuk – Shelby RogersRogers (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katerina SiniakovaSiniakova – Cori GauffGauff (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Ludmilla SamsonovaSamsonova – Mayar SherifSherif (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nuria Parrizas-DiazParrizas-Diaz – Alize CornetCornet (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sorana CirsteaCirstea – Tereza MartincovaMartincova (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Madison KeysKeys – Elina SvitolinaSvitolina (2-2) – H2H and prediction