Storm Sanders and Kirsten Flipkens will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Adelaide International 2 for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 3:00 pm on MATCH COURT 3. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Storm Sanders who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Storm Sanders is the pick to win this match.
Storm Sanders -> 1.57
Kirsten Flipkens -> 2.25
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Storm Sanders vs. Kirsten Flipkens
This will be the 2nd time that Storm Sanders and Kirsten Flipkens square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Flipkens (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they squared off, Flipkens won 4-6 7-6(3) 7-6(5) in the 2nd round in Hobart back in 2014.
Storm Sanders
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 14-5 | 14-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 25-15 | 12-10 | 9-4 | 1-0 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-19 | 17-12 | 2-3 | 3-1 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 27-15 | 10-7 | 11-5 | 2-1 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 8-7 | 6-3 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 132, Storm got to the qualifications after beating Qiang Wang 3-6 6-4 6-3.
In the qualifications against Wang, The Australian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-4 6-3). During the match, Sanders scored 102 points vs Wang’s 97. Storm was extremely aggressive to blast 42 winners.
Regarding the service games, Sanders scored 3 aces and she committed only 8 double faults. Storm Sanders lost the serve 5 times and she saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Sanders put 71% of her first serves in, winning 63% (42/67) of the points behind her 1st serve and 36% (10/28) on the 2nd serve. The Australian broke Wang 6 times after converting 35% of her break points (6/17).
Sanders has a winning record in the last 9 years having won 55% of her matches (143-115). 1-1 on hard in 2022. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this competition, Sanders has a composed82-67 win-loss record in the last 9 years on hard.
Storm has a composed 1-1 win-loss record in 2022, 1-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Adelaide
Kirsten Flipkens
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 13-9 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 7-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 7-8 | 7-7 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 9-10 | 8-8 | 0-2 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 30-26 | 17-13 | 0-5 | 10-4 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2018 | 31-24 | 12-11 | 8-6 | 2-5 | 9-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 311, will start her run in Adelaide after she played her last match in Adelaide where she defeated 6-2 6-0 to Piter in the qualifications on the 9th of January.
This will be the first match of the year on hard.
In terms of her career, The Belgian has an overall 476-367 record. She has a positive 174-140 record on hard.
Previously in Adelaide
The Belgian has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Sanders | Flipkens |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 28 | 14 |
| Pts | 102-97 | 62-33 |
| Total Points | 199 | 95 |
| Winners | 42 | 16 |
| %Winners | 41% | 26% |
Both Sanders and Flipkens played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Storm Sanders surrendered 1 set while Kirsten Flipkens hasn’t conceded a set so far. Sanders has played 1 set more than Flipkens (3 vs 2). Therefore, Sanders played 14 games more than Flipkens. Storm scored 42 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, The Belgian made 16 winners (26%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Sanders | Flipkens |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 3 |
| 1st in | 67/95 | 19/34 |
| %1st in | 71% | 56% |
| 1st pts | 42/67 | 16/19 |
| %1st pts | 63% | 84% |
| 2nd pts | 10/28 | 9/15 |
| %2nd pts | 36% | 60% |
Sanders fired 3 aces . Flipkens scored 3 aces . Sanders won 63% points on her first serve. She pretty solid on her second serve to win 36% of the points. On the other side, Flipkens won 84% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 60% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Sanders | Flipkens |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 6 |
| Converted | 6/17 | 6/13 |
| % Converted | 35% | 46% |
| Conceded | 11 | 1 |
| Saved | 6 | 0 |
| % Saved | 55% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 1 |
Sanders broke her opponent 6 times with a 35% conversion rate. Sanders conceded her serve 5 times and she saved 55% of the break points that she conceded. The Belgian broke her opponent 6 times with a 46% conversion rate. Flipkens conceded her serve once and she saved 0% of the break points that she conceded.
| Sanders | |||
| Q1 Wang |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
| pts | 102-97 | 102-97 | |
| Total points | 199 | 199 | |
| Winners | 42 | 42 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 8 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 67/95 | 67/95 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 42/67 | 42/67 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 63% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/28 | 10/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 36% | 36% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/17 | 6/17 | |
| Converted % | 35% | 35% | |
| Conceded | 11 | 11 | |
| Saved | 6/11 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 55% | 55% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
| Flipkens | |||
| Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | |||
| Tot Set | 0 | ||
| Tot Games | 0 | ||
| pts | 0-0 | ||
| Total points | 0 | ||
| Winners | 0 | ||
| %Winners | 0% | ||
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | ||
| Double Faults | 0 | ||
| 1st in | 0/0 | ||
| % 1st in | 0% | ||
| 1st pts | 0/0 | ||
| % 1st pts | 0% | ||
| 2nd pts | 0/0 | ||
| % 2nd pts | 0% | ||
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 0 | ||
| Converted | 0/0 | ||
| Converted % | 0% | ||
| Conceded | 0 | ||
| Saved | 0 | ||
| Saved % | 0% | ||
| Times Broken | 0 | ||
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Alison Van UytvanckVan Uytvanck – Dayana YastremskaYastremska (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kirsten FlipkensFlipkens – Storm SandersSanders (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anastasia PotapovaPotapova – Kristina KucovaKucova (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Heather WatsonWatson – Danka KovinicKovinic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rebecca PetersonPeterson – Xiyu WangWang (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Lauren DavisDavis – Eri HozumiHozumi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Magda LinetteLinette – Alison RiskeRiske (0-4) – H2H and prediction
- Anhelina KalininaKalinina – Veronika KudermetovaKudermetova (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Marketa VondrousovaVondrousova – Viktorija GolubicGolubic (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ana KonjuhKonjuh – Daria GavrilovaGavrilova (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Marta KostyukKostyuk – Shelby RogersRogers (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katerina SiniakovaSiniakova – Cori GauffGauff (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Ludmilla SamsonovaSamsonova – Mayar SherifSherif (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nuria Parrizas-DiazParrizas-Diaz – Alize CornetCornet (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sorana CirsteaCirstea – Tereza MartincovaMartincova (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Madison KeysKeys – Elina SvitolinaSvitolina (2-2) – H2H and prediction
